These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38989160)
1. Minimally invasive approaches versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic valve disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 17 269 patients. Khalid S; Hassan M; Ali A; Anwar F; Siddiqui MS; Shrestha S Ann Med Surg (Lond); 2024 Jul; 86(7):4005-4014. PubMed ID: 38989160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative effects of minimally invasive approaches vs. conventional for obese patients undergoing aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Abdelaal SA; Abdelrahim NA; Mamdouh M; Ahmed N; Ahmed TR; Hefnawy MT; Alaqori LK; Abozaid M BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2023 Aug; 23(1):392. PubMed ID: 37559011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement: The network meta-analysis. Ogami T; Yokoyama Y; Takagi H; Serna-Gallegos D; Ferdinand FD; Sultan I; Kuno T J Card Surg; 2022 Dec; 37(12):4868-4874. PubMed ID: 36378939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement. Kirmani BH; Jones SG; Malaisrie SC; Chung DA; Williams RJ Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Apr; 4(4):CD011793. PubMed ID: 28394022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement versus aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy: the Brigham and Women's Hospital experience. Neely RC; Boskovski MT; Gosev I; Kaneko T; McGurk S; Leacche M; Cohn LH Ann Cardiothorac Surg; 2015 Jan; 4(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 25694975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement. Kirmani BH; Jones SG; Muir A; Malaisrie SC; Chung DA; Williams RJ; Akowuah E Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2023 Dec; 12(12):CD011793. PubMed ID: 38054555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Full sternotomy versus right anterior minithoracotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: a propensity-matched study †. Gilmanov D; Farneti PA; Ferrarini M; Santarelli F; Murzi M; Miceli A; Solinas M; Glauber M Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 20(6):732-41; discussion 741. PubMed ID: 25757476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Benefits of rapid deployment aortic valve replacement with a mini upper sternotomy. Chien S; Clark C; Maheshwari S; Koutsogiannidis CP; Zamvar V; Giordano V; Lim K; Pessotto R J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Aug; 15(1):226. PubMed ID: 32847577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mini-Stern Trial: A randomized trial comparing mini-sternotomy to full median sternotomy for aortic valve replacement. Nair SK; Sudarshan CD; Thorpe BS; Singh J; Pillay T; Catarino P; Valchanov K; Codispoti M; Dunning J; Abu-Omar Y; Moorjani N; Matthews C; Freeman CJ; Fox-Rushby JA; Sharples LD J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Dec; 156(6):2124-2132.e31. PubMed ID: 30075959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minithoracotomy versus full sternotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement: Propensity matched data from two centers. Meyer A; van Kampen A; Kiefer P; Sündermann S; Van Praet KM; Borger MA; Falk V; Kempfert J J Card Surg; 2021 Jan; 36(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 33135258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mini-sternotomy vs right anterior thoracotomy for aortic valve replacement. Yousuf Salmasi M; Hamilton H; Rahman I; Chien L; Rival P; Benedetto U; Young C; Caputo M; Angelini GD; Vohra HA J Card Surg; 2020 Jul; 35(7):1570-1582. PubMed ID: 32652784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally invasive and conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score analysis. Gilmanov D; Bevilacqua S; Murzi M; Cerillo AG; Gasbarri T; Kallushi E; Miceli A; Glauber M Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Sep; 96(3):837-43. PubMed ID: 23866805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement Via Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy: Propensity Matched Initial Experience. Seitz M; Goldblatt J; Paul E; Marcus T; Larobina M; Yap CH Heart Lung Circ; 2019 Feb; 28(2):320-326. PubMed ID: 29291961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Full sternotomy and minimal access approaches for surgical aortic valve replacement: a multicentre propensity-matched study. Paparella D; Malvindi PG; Santarpino G; Moscarelli M; Guida P; Fattouch K; Margari V; Martinelli L; Albertini A; Speziale G Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Apr; 57(4):709-716. PubMed ID: 31647535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mini-sternotomy versus full sternotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement: A single-center experience. El-Andari R; White A; Fialka NM; Shan S; Manikala VK; Hong Y; Wang S J Card Surg; 2022 Dec; 37(12):4579-4586. PubMed ID: 36378945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Supracommissural replacement of the ascending aorta and the aortic valve via partial versus full sternotomy-a propensity-matched comparison in a high-volume centre. Haunschild J; van Kampen A; von Aspern K; Misfeld M; Davierwala P; Saeed D; Borger MA; Etz CD Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2022 Jan; 61(2):479-487. PubMed ID: 34453828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]