These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38992388)

  • 21. Landscape patterns of bioenergy in a changing climate: implications for crop allocation and land-use competition.
    Graves RA; Pearson SM; Turner MG
    Ecol Appl; 2016 Mar; 26(2):515-29. PubMed ID: 27209792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Farm systems assessment of bioenergy feedstock production: Integrating bio-economic models and life cycle analysis approaches.
    Glithero NJ; Ramsden SJ; Wilson P
    Agric Syst; 2012 Jun; 109():53-64. PubMed ID: 25540473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mass flow and energy balance plus economic analysis of a full-scale biogas plant in the rice-wine-pig system.
    Li J; Kong C; Duan Q; Luo T; Mei Z; Lei Y
    Bioresour Technol; 2015 Oct; 193():62-7. PubMed ID: 26117236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Biogas potential from agricultural waste and its CO
    Yan B; Li Y; Shi W; Yan J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 May; 30(24):66170-66185. PubMed ID: 37097577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessment of the availability of agricultural crop residues in the European Union: potential and limitations for bioenergy use.
    Scarlat N; Martinov M; Dallemand JF
    Waste Manag; 2010 Oct; 30(10):1889-97. PubMed ID: 20494567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Spatial and life cycle assessment of bioenergy-driven land-use changes in Ireland.
    Clarke R; Sosa A; Murphy F
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 May; 664():262-275. PubMed ID: 30743120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dependency of global primary bioenergy crop potentials in 2050 on food systems, yields, biodiversity conservation and political stability.
    Erb KH; Haberl H; Plutzar C
    Energy Policy; 2012 Aug; 47(4):260-269. PubMed ID: 23576836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Changing pollutants to green biogases for the crop food cycle chain.
    Zong BY; Xu FJ; Zong BD; Zhang ZG
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2012 Sep; 19(8):3450-60. PubMed ID: 22528992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Relevance of farm-scale indicators and tools for farmers to assess sustainability of their mixed crop-ruminant livestock systems.
    Leite FFGD; Faverin C; Ciganda VS; Cristobal-Carballo O; Dos Reis JC; Eugène M; Fariña S; Hercher-Pasteur J; Monteiro A; Pastell M; Recavarren P; Romera A; Rosanowski S; Tieri MP; Aubry A; Veysset P; Kenny D; Vibart R
    Sci Total Environ; 2024 Nov; 950():175218. PubMed ID: 39097025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A global yield dataset for major lignocellulosic bioenergy crops based on field measurements.
    Li W; Ciais P; Makowski D; Peng S
    Sci Data; 2018 Aug; 5():180169. PubMed ID: 30129935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Can farmers mitigate environmental impacts through combined production of food, fuel and feed? A consequential life cycle assessment of integrated mixed crop-livestock system with a green biorefinery.
    Parajuli R; Dalgaard T; Birkved M
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Apr; 619-620():127-143. PubMed ID: 29145050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A site-related suitability analysis for the production of biomass as a contribution to sustainable regional land-use.
    Förster M; Helms Y; Herberg A; Köppen A; Kunzmann K; Radtke D; Ross L; Itzerott S
    Environ Manage; 2008 Apr; 41(4):584-98. PubMed ID: 18228088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bioenergy to save the world. Producing novel energy plants for growth on abandoned land.
    Schröder P; Herzig R; Bojinov B; Ruttens A; Nehnevajova E; Stamatiadis S; Memon A; Vassilev A; Caviezel M; Vangronsveld J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2008 May; 15(3):196-204. PubMed ID: 18504837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Climate change mitigation: the potential of agriculture as a renewable energy source in Nigeria.
    Elum ZA; Modise DM; Nhamo G
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Feb; 24(4):3260-3273. PubMed ID: 27933500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Coupling optimization with territorial LCA to support agricultural land-use planning.
    Ding T; Steubing B; Achten WMJ
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Feb; 328():116946. PubMed ID: 36527805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Anaerobic digestion of different feedstocks: impact on energetic and environmental balances of biogas process.
    Bacenetti J; Negri M; Fiala M; González-García S
    Sci Total Environ; 2013 Oct; 463-464():541-51. PubMed ID: 23831800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Biofuels from wastes in Marmara Region, Turkey: potentials and constraints.
    Ocak S; Acar S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Dec; 28(46):66026-66042. PubMed ID: 34324148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Review: Role of herbivores in sustainable agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa.
    Ayantunde AA; Duncan AJ; van Wijk MT; Thorne P
    Animal; 2018 Dec; 12(s2):s199-s209. PubMed ID: 30139396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Spatial pattern and evolutionary trend of sustainable development index of crop-livestock system: A case study in Shandong Province, China.].
    Li Y; Sun ZG; Zhang XB; Yang JC; Hang S; Li SJ; Zhu WX; Lyu Y; Ouyang Z
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2019 Jul; 30(7):2371-2383. PubMed ID: 31418241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Finding pathways to national-scale land-sector sustainability.
    Gao L; Bryan BA
    Nature; 2017 Apr; 544(7649):217-222. PubMed ID: 28406202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.