These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38992513)

  • 1. Identification of ChatGPT-Generated Abstracts Within Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Poses a Challenge for Reviewers.
    Stadler RD; Sudah SY; Moverman MA; Denard PJ; Duralde XA; Garrigues GE; Klifto CS; Levy JC; Namdari S; Sanchez-Sotelo J; Menendez ME
    Arthroscopy; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38992513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Human vs machine: identifying ChatGPT-generated abstracts in Gynecology and Urogynecology.
    Pan ET; Florian-Rodriguez M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Aug; 231(2):276.e1-276.e10. PubMed ID: 38710267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers.
    Gao CA; Howard FM; Markov NS; Dyer EC; Ramesh S; Luo Y; Pearson AT
    NPJ Digit Med; 2023 Apr; 6(1):75. PubMed ID: 37100871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the Reproducibility of the Structured Abstracts Generated by ChatGPT and Bard Compared to Human-Written Abstracts in the Field of Spine Surgery: Comparative Analysis.
    Kim HJ; Yang JH; Chang DG; Lenke LG; Pizones J; Castelein R; Watanabe K; Trobisch PD; Mundis GM; Suh SW; Suk SI
    J Med Internet Res; 2024 Jun; 26():e52001. PubMed ID: 38924787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Study on Distinguishing ChatGPT-Generated and Human-Written Orthopaedic Abstracts by Reviewers: Decoding the Discrepancies.
    Makiev KG; Asimakidou M; Vasios IS; Keskinis A; Petkidis G; Tilkeridis K; Ververidis A; Iliopoulos E
    Cureus; 2023 Nov; 15(11):e49166. PubMed ID: 38130535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Association of reviewer experience with discriminating human-written versus ChatGPT-written abstracts.
    Levin G; Pareja R; Viveros-Carreño D; Sanchez Diaz E; Yates EM; Zand B; Ramirez PT
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2024 May; 34(5):669-674. PubMed ID: 38627032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparisons of Quality, Correctness, and Similarity Between ChatGPT-Generated and Human-Written Abstracts for Basic Research: Cross-Sectional Study.
    Cheng SL; Tsai SJ; Bai YM; Ko CH; Hsu CW; Yang FC; Tsai CK; Tu YK; Yang SN; Tseng PT; Hsu TW; Liang CS; Su KP
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Dec; 25():e51229. PubMed ID: 38145486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What is the rate of text generated by artificial intelligence over a year of publication in Orthopedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research? Analysis of 425 articles before versus after the launch of ChatGPT in November 2022.
    Bisi T; Risser A; Clavert P; Migaud H; Dartus J
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2023 Dec; 109(8):103694. PubMed ID: 37776949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Medical Research Abstracts Written by Surgical Trainees and Senior Surgeons or Generated by Large Language Models.
    Holland AM; Lorenz WR; Cavanagh JC; Smart NJ; Ayuso SA; Scarola GT; Kercher KW; Jorgensen LN; Janis JE; Fischer JP; Heniford BT
    JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Aug; 7(8):e2425373. PubMed ID: 39093561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Potential and Concerns of Using AI in Scientific Research: ChatGPT Performance Evaluation.
    Khlaif ZN; Mousa A; Hattab MK; Itmazi J; Hassan AA; Sanmugam M; Ayyoub A
    JMIR Med Educ; 2023 Sep; 9():e47049. PubMed ID: 37707884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of an AI-Generated Case Report With a Human-Written Case Report: Practical Considerations for AI-Assisted Medical Writing.
    Pinto DS; Noronha SM; Saigal G; Quencer RM
    Cureus; 2024 May; 16(5):e60461. PubMed ID: 38883028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterizing the Increase in Artificial Intelligence Content Detection in Oncology Scientific Abstracts From 2021 to 2023.
    Howard FM; Li A; Riffon MF; Garrett-Mayer E; Pearson AT
    JCO Clin Cancer Inform; 2024 May; 8():e2400077. PubMed ID: 38822755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rise of the Machines: The Prevalence and Disclosure of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Text in High-Impact Orthopaedic Journals.
    Pesante BD; Mauffrey C; Parry JA
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38941622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Between human and AI: assessing the reliability of AI text detection tools.
    Bellini V; Semeraro F; Montomoli J; Cascella M; Bignami E
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2024 Mar; 40(3):353-358. PubMed ID: 38265047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can ChatGPT assist authors with abstract writing in medical journals? Evaluating the quality of scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT and original abstracts.
    Hwang T; Aggarwal N; Khan PZ; Roberts T; Mahmood A; Griffiths MM; Parsons N; Khan S
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(2):e0297701. PubMed ID: 38354135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Human versus artificial intelligence-generated arthroplasty literature: A single-blinded analysis of perceived communication, quality, and authorship source.
    Lawrence KW; Habibi AA; Ward SA; Lajam CM; Schwarzkopf R; Rozell JC
    Int J Med Robot; 2024 Feb; 20(1):e2621. PubMed ID: 38348740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The ChatGPT conundrum: Human-generated scientific manuscripts misidentified as AI creations by AI text detection tool.
    Rashidi HH; Fennell BD; Albahra S; Hu B; Gorbett T
    J Pathol Inform; 2023; 14():100342. PubMed ID: 38116171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ChatGPT and the Future of Journal Reviews: A Feasibility Study.
    Biswas S; Dobaria D; Cohen HL
    Yale J Biol Med; 2023 Sep; 96(3):415-420. PubMed ID: 37780993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance of Artificial Intelligence Content Detectors Using Human and Artificial Intelligence-Generated Scientific Writing.
    Flitcroft MA; Sheriff SA; Wolfrath N; Maddula R; McConnell L; Xing Y; Haines KL; Wong SL; Kothari AN
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38909113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.