These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38992863)

  • 1. Chronic Electro-Acoustic Stimulation May Interfere With Electric Threshold Recovery After Cochlear Implantation in the Aged Guinea Pig.
    Reiss LAJ; Lawrence MB; Omelchenko IA; He W; Kirk JR
    Ear Hear; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38992863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Morphological correlates of hearing loss after cochlear implantation and electro-acoustic stimulation in a hearing-impaired Guinea pig model.
    Reiss LA; Stark G; Nguyen-Huynh AT; Spear KA; Zhang H; Tanaka C; Li H
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():163-74. PubMed ID: 26087114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors associated with hearing loss in a normal-hearing guinea pig model of Hybrid cochlear implants.
    Tanaka C; Nguyen-Huynh A; Loera K; Stark G; Reiss L
    Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():82-93. PubMed ID: 25128626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Longitudinal Electrocochleography as an Objective Measure of Serial Behavioral Audiometry in Electro-Acoustic Stimulation Patients.
    Tejani VD; Kim JS; Etler CP; Skidmore J; Yuan Y; He S; Hansen MR; Gantz BJ; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1014-1028. PubMed ID: 36790447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of an enhanced acoustic environment on residual hearing following chronic cochlear implantation and electrical stimulation in the partially deafened cat.
    Wise AK; Atkinson P; Fallon JB
    Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108635. PubMed ID: 36306607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Phantom Stimulation for Cochlear Implant Users With Residual Low-Frequency Hearing.
    Krüger B; Büchner A; Nogueira W
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(2):631-645. PubMed ID: 34593687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychoacoustic and electrophysiological electric-acoustic interaction effects in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
    Imsiecke M; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2020 Feb; 386():107873. PubMed ID: 31884220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
    Xu J; Shepherd RK; Millard RE; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term residual hearing in cochlear implanted adult patients who were candidates for electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Mamelle E; Granger B; Sterkers O; Lahlou G; Ferrary E; Nguyen Y; Mosnier I
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Mar; 277(3):705-713. PubMed ID: 31802226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Binaural cue sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients with acoustic hearing preservation.
    Gifford RH; Stecker GC
    Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107929. PubMed ID: 32182551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cochlear implantation with hearing preservation yields significant benefit for speech recognition in complex listening environments.
    Gifford RH; Dorman MF; Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Polak M; Driscoll CL; Roland P; Buchman CA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):413-25. PubMed ID: 23446225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does cochlear implantation and electrical stimulation affect residual hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons?
    Coco A; Epp SB; Fallon JB; Xu J; Millard RE; Shepherd RK
    Hear Res; 2007 Mar; 225(1-2):60-70. PubMed ID: 17258411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of hearing preservation on psychophysical responses to cochlear implant stimulation.
    Kang SY; Colesa DJ; Swiderski DL; Su GL; Raphael Y; Pfingst BE
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2010 Jun; 11(2):245-65. PubMed ID: 19902297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Guinea Pig Model Suggests That Objective Assessment of Acoustic Hearing Preservation in Human Ears With Cochlear Implants Is Confounded by Shifts in the Spatial Origin of Acoustically Evoked Potential Measurements Along the Cochlear Length.
    Lee C; Hartsock JJ; Salt AN; Lichtenhan JT
    Ear Hear; 2024 May-Jun 01; 45(3):666-678. PubMed ID: 38178312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hearing preservation at low frequencies by insulin-like growth factor 1 in a guinea pig model of cochlear implantation.
    Yamahara K; Nishimura K; Ogita H; Ito J; Nakagawa T; Furuta I; Kita T; Omori K; Yamamoto N
    Hear Res; 2018 Oct; 368():92-108. PubMed ID: 30006113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frequency-to-Place Mismatch: Characterizing Variability and the Influence on Speech Perception Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Canfarotta MW; Dillon MT; Buss E; Pillsbury HC; Brown KD; O'Connell BP
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1349-1361. PubMed ID: 32205726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changes in Gene Expression and Hearing Thresholds After Cochlear Implantation.
    Zhang H; Stark G; Reiss L
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Aug; 36(7):1157-65. PubMed ID: 25970030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electric-Acoustic Stimulation After Reimplantation: Hearing Preservation and Speech Perception.
    Thompson NJ; Dillon MT; Bucker AL; King ER; Pillsbury HC; Brown KD
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Feb; 40(2):e94-e98. PubMed ID: 30624400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bilateral electric acoustic stimulation: a comparison of partial and deep cochlear electrode insertion. A longitudinal case study.
    Kleine Punte A; Vermeire K; Van de Heyning P
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 67():144-152. PubMed ID: 19955731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.