These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38995526)
21. Mucosal irritation potential of personal lubricants relates to product osmolality as detected by the slug mucosal irritation assay. Adriaens E; Remon JP Sex Transm Dis; 2008 May; 35(5):512-6. PubMed ID: 18356773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The evaluation of the local tolerance of vaginal formulations containing dapivirine using the Slug Mucosal Irritation test and the rabbit vaginal irritation test. Dhondt MM; Adriaens E; Roey JV; Remon JP Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2005 Aug; 60(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 15996583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of fibrin-based dermal-epidermal organotypic cultures for in vitro skin corrosion and irritation testing of chemicals according to OECD TG 431 and 439. Morales M; Pérez D; Correa L; Restrepo L Toxicol In Vitro; 2016 Oct; 36():89-96. PubMed ID: 27448499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. pH and the potential irritancy of douche formulations to the vaginal mucosa of the albino rabbit and rat. Kaminsky M; Willigan DA Food Chem Toxicol; 1982 Apr; 20(2):193-6. PubMed ID: 7200937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prediction of eye irritation potential of surfactant-based rinse-off personal care formulations by the bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) assay. Cater KC; Harbell JW Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2006; 25(3):217-33. PubMed ID: 16980247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The suitability of reconstructed human epidermis models for medical device irritation assessment: A comparison of In Vitro and In Vivo testing results. De Jong WH; Carraway JW; Liu C; Fan C; Liu J; Turley AP; Rollins TS; Coleman KP Toxicol In Vitro; 2020 Dec; 69():104995. PubMed ID: 32891721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An alternative test battery in detecting ocular irritancy of agrochemicals. Tavaszi J; Budai P; Pálovics A; Kismányoki A Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):891-5. PubMed ID: 19226840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Eye irritation testing of nanomaterials using the EpiOcular™ eye irritation test and the bovine corneal opacity and permeability assay. Kolle SN; Sauer UG; Moreno MC; Teubner W; Wohlleben W; Landsiedel R Part Fibre Toxicol; 2016 Apr; 13():18. PubMed ID: 27083156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Clinical and Personal Lubricants Impact the Growth of Vaginal Lactobacillus Species and Colonization of Vaginal Epithelial Cells: An in Vitro Study. Łaniewski P; Owen KA; Khnanisho M; Brotman RM; Herbst-Kralovetz MM Sex Transm Dis; 2021 Jan; 48(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 32842049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Development and characterization of a three-dimensional organotypic human vaginal epithelial cell model. Hjelm BE; Berta AN; Nickerson CA; Arntzen CJ; Herbst-Kralovetz MM Biol Reprod; 2010 Mar; 82(3):617-27. PubMed ID: 20007410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A strategy for skin irritation testing. Robinson MK; Perkins MA Am J Contact Dermat; 2002 Mar; 13(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 11887101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessment of cervicovaginal cytokine levels following exposure to microbicide Nisin gel in rabbits. Aranha CC; Gupta SM; Reddy KV Cytokine; 2008 Jul; 43(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 18513989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Human-relevant approaches to assess eye corrosion/irritation potential of agrochemical formulations. Clippinger AJ; Raabe HA; Allen DG; Choksi NY; van der Zalm AJ; Kleinstreuer NC; Barroso J; Lowit AB Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2021 Jun; 40(2):145-167. PubMed ID: 33830843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Property characterization of reconstructed human epidermis equivalents, and performance as a skin irritation model. Capallere C; Plaza C; Meyrignac C; Arcioni M; Brulas M; Busuttil V; Garcia I; Bauza É; Botto JM Toxicol In Vitro; 2018 Dec; 53():45-56. PubMed ID: 30053440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. In vitro reconstructed 3D corneal tissue models for ocular toxicology and ophthalmic drug development. Kaluzhny Y; Klausner M In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim; 2021 Feb; 57(2):207-237. PubMed ID: 33544359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Application of an in vitro reconstructed human skin on cosmetics in skin irritation tests. Ma X; Wang F; Wang B J Cosmet Dermatol; 2021 Jun; 20(6):1933-1941. PubMed ID: 33053260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prostaglandin production by rat vaginal tissue, in vitro, in response to ethanol, a mild mucosal irritant. Dubin NH; Wolff MC; Thomas CL; DiBlasi MC Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 1985 May; 78(3):458-63. PubMed ID: 4049394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Alternative methods for eye and skin irritation tests: an overview. Vinardell MP; Mitjans M J Pharm Sci; 2008 Jan; 97(1):46-59. PubMed ID: 17701961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. In vitro skin irritation assessment becomes a reality in China using a reconstructed human epidermis test method. Li N; Liu Y; Qiu J; Zhong L; Alépée N; Cotovio J; Cai Z Toxicol In Vitro; 2017 Jun; 41():159-167. PubMed ID: 28219724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]