These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3900130)

  • 1. Evaluation of Abbott Quantum II yeast identification system.
    Salkin IF; Schadow KH; Bankaitis LA; McGinnis MR; Kemna ME
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Sep; 22(3):442-4. PubMed ID: 3900130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the Baxter-MicroScan 4-hour enzyme-based yeast identification system.
    Land GA; Salkin IF; el-Zaatari M; McGinnis MR; Hashem G
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Apr; 29(4):718-22. PubMed ID: 1653786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card and API 20C yeast identification systems.
    Fenn JP; Segal H; Barland B; Denton D; Whisenant J; Chun H; Christofferson K; Hamilton L; Carroll K
    J Clin Microbiol; 1994 May; 32(5):1184-7. PubMed ID: 8051243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical comparison of the Baxter MicroScan Yeast Identification Panel and the Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card.
    Riddle DL; Giger O; Miller L; Hall GS; Woods GL
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Apr; 101(4):438-42. PubMed ID: 8160633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Misidentification of clinical yeast isolates by using the updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card.
    Dooley DP; Beckius ML; Jeffrey BS
    J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Dec; 32(12):2889-92. PubMed ID: 7883873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the API Candida system with the AUXACOLOR system for identification of common yeast pathogens.
    Campbell CK; Davey KG; Holmes AD; Szekely A; Warnock DW
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Mar; 37(3):821-3. PubMed ID: 9986865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the new Mycotube test-kit for yeast identification.
    Guinet RM
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Feb; 4(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 3886377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the AUXACOLOR system for the identification of clinical yeast isolates.
    Milan EP; Malheiros ES; Fischman O; Colombo AL
    Mycopathologia; 1997; 137(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 9368409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rapid identification of yeasts by semi-automated and conventional methods.
    Qadri SM; Flournoy DJ; Qadri SG; Ramirez EG
    Med Microbiol Immunol; 1986; 175(5):307-16. PubMed ID: 3762492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis for identification of yeast species isolated from bovine intramammary infection.
    Fadda ME; Pisano MB; Scaccabarozzi L; Mossa V; Deplano M; Moroni P; Liciardi M; Cosentino S
    J Dairy Sci; 2013; 96(12):7692-7. PubMed ID: 24119798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the new API Candida system for identification of the most clinically important yeast species.
    Bernal S; Martín Mazuelos E; Chávez M; Coronilla J; Valverde A
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1998 Nov; 32(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 9884839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Evaluation of common commercial systems for the identification of yeast isolates in microbiology laboratories: a multicenter study].
    Karabıçak N; Uludağ Altun H; Karatuna O; Hazırolan G; Aksu N; Adiloğlu A; Akyar I
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2015 Apr; 49(2):210-20. PubMed ID: 26167821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of three commercial systems for identification of yeasts commonly isolated in the clinical microbiology laboratory.
    Wadlin JK; Hanko G; Stewart R; Pape J; Nachamkin I
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jun; 37(6):1967-70. PubMed ID: 10325356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of rapid testing methods for enzyme production with the germ tube method for presumptive identification of Candida albicans.
    Heelan JS; Siliezar D; Coon K
    J Clin Microbiol; 1996 Nov; 34(11):2847-9. PubMed ID: 8897198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative evaluation of the Iatron serological Candida check kit and the API 20C kit for identification of medically important Candida species.
    Shinoda T; Kaufman L; Padhye AA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Mar; 13(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 7016900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of two commercialized systems for the rapid identification of medically important yeasts.
    Quindós G; Lipperheide V; Pontón J
    Mycoses; 1993; 36(9-10):299-303. PubMed ID: 8015561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experience with the MicroSeq D2 large-subunit ribosomal DNA sequencing kit for identification of commonly encountered, clinically important yeast species.
    Hall L; Wohlfiel S; Roberts GD
    J Clin Microbiol; 2003 Nov; 41(11):5099-102. PubMed ID: 14605145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system Yeast Biochemical Card for rapid identification of medically important yeasts.
    Oblack DL; Rhodes JC; Martin WJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Feb; 13(2):351-5. PubMed ID: 7009641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the Quantum II, API Yeast Ident, and AutoMicrobic systems for identification of clinical yeast isolates.
    Pfaller MA; Preston T; Bale M; Koontz FP; Body BA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Oct; 26(10):2054-8. PubMed ID: 3182994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ability of RapID Yeast Plus System to identify 304 clinically significant yeasts within 5 hours.
    Kitch TT; Jacobs MR; McGinnis MR; Appelbaum PC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1996 May; 34(5):1069-71. PubMed ID: 8727877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.