These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39003269)

  • 1. Automatic 3D reconstruction of vertebrae from orthogonal bi-planar radiographs.
    Chen Y; Gao Y; Fu X; Chen Y; Wu J; Guo C; Li X
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jul; 14(1):16165. PubMed ID: 39003269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. BX2S-Net: Learning to reconstruct 3D spinal structures from bi-planar X-ray images.
    Chen Z; Guo L; Zhang R; Fang Z; He X; Wang J
    Comput Biol Med; 2023 Mar; 154():106615. PubMed ID: 36739821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anatomy-Aware Inference of the 3D Standing Spine Posture from 2D Radiographs.
    Bayat A; Pace DF; Sekuboyina A; Payer C; Stern D; Urschler M; Kirschke JS; Menze BH
    Tomography; 2022 Feb; 8(1):479-496. PubMed ID: 35202204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automatic vertebrae localization and segmentation in CT with a two-stage Dense-U-Net.
    Cheng P; Yang Y; Yu H; He Y
    Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):22156. PubMed ID: 34772972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. SGReg: segmentation guided 3D/2D rigid registration for orthogonal X-ray and CT images in spine surgery navigation.
    Mi J; Yin W; Zhao L; Chen Y; Zhou Y; Feng Q
    Phys Med Biol; 2023 Jun; 68(13):. PubMed ID: 37141893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical validation of coronal and sagittal spinal curve measurements based on three-dimensional vertebra vector parameters.
    Somoskeöy S; Tunyogi-Csapó M; Bogyó C; Illés T
    Spine J; 2012 Oct; 12(10):960-8. PubMed ID: 23018164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anatomy-aware computed tomography-to-ultrasound spine registration.
    Azampour MF; Tirindelli M; Lameski J; Gafencu M; Tagliabue E; Fatemizadeh E; Hacihaliloglu I; Navab N
    Med Phys; 2024 Mar; 51(3):2044-2056. PubMed ID: 37708456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lumbar spine segmentation method based on deep learning.
    Lu H; Li M; Yu K; Zhang Y; Yu L
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Jun; 24(6):e13996. PubMed ID: 37082799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative analysis of spinal curvature in 3D: application to CT images of normal spine.
    Vrtovec T; Likar B; Pernus F
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(7):1895-908. PubMed ID: 18364545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Deep learning-based 2D/3D registration of an atlas to biplanar X-ray images.
    Van Houtte J; Audenaert E; Zheng G; Sijbers J
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2022 Jul; 17(7):1333-1342. PubMed ID: 35294717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. PGNet: Projection generative network for sparse-view reconstruction of projection-based magnetic particle imaging.
    Wu X; He B; Gao P; Zhang P; Shang Y; Zhang L; Zhong J; Jiang J; Hui H; Tian J
    Med Phys; 2023 Apr; 50(4):2354-2371. PubMed ID: 36239207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 3D Cascaded Convolutional Networks for Multi-vertebrae Segmentation.
    Xia L; Xiao L; Quan G; Bo W
    Curr Med Imaging; 2020; 16(3):231-240. PubMed ID: 32133953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Deformable 3D-2D image registration and analysis of global spinal alignment in long-length intraoperative spine imaging.
    Zhang X; Uneri A; Huang Y; Jones CK; Witham TF; Helm PA; Siewerdsen JH
    Med Phys; 2022 Sep; 49(9):5715-5727. PubMed ID: 35762028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multi-Modality Vertebra Recognition in Arbitrary Views Using 3D Deformable Hierarchical Model.
    Cai Y; Osman S; Sharma M; Landis M; Li S
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2015 Aug; 34(8):1676-93. PubMed ID: 25594966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of 3-dimensional spinal reconstruction accuracy: biplanar radiographs with EOS versus computed tomography.
    Glaser DA; Doan J; Newton PO
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jul; 37(16):1391-7. PubMed ID: 22415001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computerized Characterization of Spinal Structures on MRI and Clinical Significance of 3D Reconstruction of Lumbosacral Intervertebral Foramen.
    Liu Z; Su Z; Wang M; Chen T; Cui Z; Chen X; Li S; Feng Q; Pang S; Lu H
    Pain Physician; 2022 Jan; 25(1):E27-E35. PubMed ID: 35051149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computationally efficient deep neural network for computed tomography image reconstruction.
    Wu D; Kim K; Li Q
    Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):4763-4776. PubMed ID: 31132144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. HFCF-Net: A hybrid-feature cross fusion network for COVID-19 lesion segmentation from CT volumetric images.
    Wang Y; Yang Q; Tian L; Zhou X; Rekik I; Huang H
    Med Phys; 2022 Jun; 49(6):3797-3815. PubMed ID: 35301729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multi-stage 3D-2D registration for correction of anatomical deformation in image-guided spine surgery.
    Ketcha MD; De Silva T; Uneri A; Jacobson MW; Goerres J; Kleinszig G; Vogt S; Wolinsky JP; Siewerdsen JH
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jun; 62(11):4604-4622. PubMed ID: 28375139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A semi-automated method using interpolation and optimisation for the 3D reconstruction of the spine from bi-planar radiography: a precision and accuracy study.
    Dumas R; Blanchard B; Carlier R; de Loubresse CG; Le Huec JC; Marty C; Moinard M; Vital JM
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2008 Jan; 46(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 17874152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.