These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39004015)

  • 1. The contribution of short-term memory for sound features to speech-in-noise perception and cognition.
    Lad M; Taylor JP; Griffiths TD
    Hear Res; 2024 Sep; 451():109081. PubMed ID: 39004015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of noise exposure and musical training on suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise.
    Yeend I; Beach EF; Sharma M; Dillon H
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():224-236. PubMed ID: 28780178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electric and acoustic harmonic integration predicts speech-in-noise performance in hybrid cochlear implant users.
    Bonnard D; Schwalje A; Gantz B; Choi I
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():223-230. PubMed ID: 29980380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech-in-noise detection is related to auditory working memory precision for frequency.
    Lad M; Holmes E; Chu A; Griffiths TD
    Sci Rep; 2020 Aug; 10(1):13997. PubMed ID: 32814792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cognitive abilities relate to self-reported hearing disability.
    Zekveld AA; George EL; Houtgast T; Kramer SE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Oct; 56(5):1364-72. PubMed ID: 23838985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A dynamic auditory-cognitive system supports speech-in-noise perception in older adults.
    Anderson S; White-Schwoch T; Parbery-Clark A; Kraus N
    Hear Res; 2013 Jun; 300():18-32. PubMed ID: 23541911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Step Toward Precision Audiology: Individual Differences and Characteristic Profiles From Auditory Perceptual and Cognitive Abilities.
    Cherri D; Eddins DA; Ozmeral EJ
    Trends Hear; 2024; 28():23312165241263485. PubMed ID: 39099537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Linguistic, perceptual, and cognitive factors underlying musicians' benefits in noise-degraded speech perception.
    Yoo J; Bidelman GM
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():189-195. PubMed ID: 30978607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison between the Dutch and American-English digits-in-noise (DIN) tests in normal-hearing listeners.
    Smits C; Watson CS; Kidd GR; Moore DR; Goverts ST
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(6):358-65. PubMed ID: 26940045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Danish reading span data from 283 hearing-aid users, including a sub-group analysis of their relationship to speech-in-noise performance.
    Borch Petersen E; Lunner T; Vestergaard MD; Sundewall Thorén E
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(4):254-61. PubMed ID: 26836955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamic relation between working memory capacity and speech recognition in noise during the first 6 months of hearing aid use.
    Ng EH; Classon E; Larsby B; Arlinger S; Lunner T; Rudner M; Rönnberg J
    Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25421088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relative contributions of auditory and cognitive functions on speech recognition in quiet and in noise among older adults.
    Mukari SZMS; Yusof Y; Ishak WS; Maamor N; Chellapan K; Dzulkifli MA
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2020; 86(2):149-156. PubMed ID: 30558985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimal and Mild Hearing Loss in Children: Association with Auditory Perception, Cognition, and Communication Problems.
    Moore DR; Zobay O; Ferguson MA
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):720-732. PubMed ID: 31633598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Masked speech perception across the adult lifespan: Impact of age and hearing impairment.
    Goossens T; Vercammen C; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():109-124. PubMed ID: 27845259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stimulus and listener factors affecting age-related changes in competing speech perception.
    Helfer KS; Freyman RL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):748-59. PubMed ID: 25096109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Musical Experience Offsets Age-Related Decline in Understanding Speech-in-Noise: Type of Training Does Not Matter, Working Memory Is the Key.
    Zhang L; Fu X; Luo D; Xing L; Du Y
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(2):258-270. PubMed ID: 32826504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of Cognitive Load on Pure-Tone Audiometry Thresholds in Younger and Older Adults.
    Heinrich A; Ferguson MA; Mattys SL
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):907-917. PubMed ID: 31702598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of subcortical auditory processing and cognitive measures on cocktail party listening in younger and older adults.
    Jain C; Dwarakanath VM; G A
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Feb; 58(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 30646763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Brainstem correlates of speech-in-noise perception in children.
    Anderson S; Skoe E; Chandrasekaran B; Zecker S; Kraus N
    Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 270(1-2):151-7. PubMed ID: 20708671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.