These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3900851)

  • 1. Comparative material on automated and semiautomated perimeters--1985.
    Keltner JL; Johnson CA
    Ophthalmology; 1985 Aug; 92(8 Suppl):34-57. PubMed ID: 3900851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative material on automated and semiautomated perimeters-1983.
    Keltner JL; Johnson CA
    Ophthalmology; 1983 Sep; Suppl():1-35. PubMed ID: 6646629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative evaluation of the Autofield-I, CFA-120, and Fieldmaster Model 101-PR automated perimeters.
    Johnson CA; Keltner JL
    Ophthalmology; 1980 Aug; 87(8):777-84. PubMed ID: 7443210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inter- and intraindividual sensitivity variations with manual and automated static perimeters.
    Sucs FE; Verriest G
    Ophthalmologica; 1987; 195(4):209-14. PubMed ID: 3431819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of quantitative testing with the Octopus, Humphrey, and Tübingen perimeters.
    Mills RP; Hopp RH; Drance SM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1986 Oct; 102(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 3766667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Threshold equivalence between perimeters.
    Anderson DR; Feuer WJ; Alward WL; Skuta GL
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1989 May; 107(5):493-505. PubMed ID: 2712132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer processing of visual field data. I. Recording, storage, and retrieval.
    Hart WM; Hartz RK
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1981 Jan; 99(1):128-32. PubMed ID: 7006576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integral arc illumination for projection perimeters.
    Frisén L
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1969; 47(5):1176-80. PubMed ID: 5395861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A simulator for teaching visual field techniques on Goldmann or Goldmann-type perimeters.
    Hass I; Drance SM; Fairclough M
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1979 Aug; 88(2):259-60. PubMed ID: 474698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of four projection perimeters.
    Portney GL; Hanible JE
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1976 May; 81(5):678-81. PubMed ID: 1275048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A clinical comparison of three computerized automatic perimeters in the detection of glaucoma defects.
    Heijl A; Drance SM
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1981 May; 99(5):832-6. PubMed ID: 7236085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Audiovisual materials: a survey of bibliographic controls in distributors' catalogs.
    McIlvaine PM; Brantz MH
    Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1977 Jan; 65(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 64265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automated refractors-1983.
    Guyton DL
    Ophthalmology; 1983 Sep; Suppl():36-44. PubMed ID: 6646636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of four projection perimeters. Instrument specifications.
    Portney GL; Hanible JE
    Surv Ophthalmol; 1975; 20(3):220-3. PubMed ID: 1198320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative office perimetry.
    Keltner JL; Johnson CA; Lewis RA
    Ophthalmology; 1985 Jul; 92(7):862-72. PubMed ID: 4022569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of Goldmann and Humphrey automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma.
    Trope GE; Britton R
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1987 Jul; 71(7):489-93. PubMed ID: 3307897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of visual field sensitivities between the Medmont automated perimeter and the Humphrey field analyser.
    Landers J; Sharma A; Goldberg I; Graham SL
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Apr; 38(3):273-6. PubMed ID: 20447123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computerized diagnostic instruments for ophthalmic practice.
    Guyton DL
    Ophthalmology; 1983 Sep; Suppl():115-9. PubMed ID: 6646631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. First interprofessional standard for visual field testing. Report of Working Group 39. Committee on Vission, Assembly of Behavioran and Social Sciences, National Research Council.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1976 Jun; 47(6):829-63. PubMed ID: 14185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of Goldmann, Fieldmaster 200, and Dicon AP2000 perimeters used in a screening mode.
    Mills RP
    Ophthalmology; 1984 Apr; 91(4):347-54. PubMed ID: 6717919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.