These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39010414)
21. Auditory-visual differences in human temporal judgment. Goldstone S; Lhamon WT Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Apr; 34(2):623-33. PubMed ID: 5021814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Sound quality judgment during acclimatization of hearing aid. Ovegård A; Lundberg G; Hagerman B; Gabrielsson A; Bengtsson M; Brändström U Scand Audiol; 1997; 26(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 9080554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Lexical processing and distributional knowledge in sound-spelling mapping in a consistent orthography: A longitudinal study of reading and spelling in dyslexic and typically developing children. Marinelli CV; Cellini P; Zoccolotti P; Angelelli P Cogn Neuropsychol; 2017; 34(3-4):163-186. PubMed ID: 29057705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Judgments of noticeable differences in sound fields of concert halls caused by intensity variations in early reflections. Okano T J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):217-29. PubMed ID: 11831797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The effect of context upon judgments of pitch differences. KOESTER T; SCHOENFELD WN J Exp Psychol; 1946 Oct; 36():417-30. PubMed ID: 21000773 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Spectral information for detection of acoustic time to arrival. Gordon MS; Russo FA; MacDonald E Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 May; 75(4):738-50. PubMed ID: 23359354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. What drives sound symbolism? Different acoustic cues underlie sound-size and sound-shape mappings. Knoeferle K; Li J; Maggioni E; Spence C Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):5562. PubMed ID: 28717151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Sound design of chimney pipes by optimization of their resonators. Rucz P; Trommer T; Angster J; Miklós A; Augusztinovicz F J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):529-37. PubMed ID: 23297924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The effects of different frequency responses on sound quality judgments and speech intelligibility. Gabrielsson A; Schenkman BN; Hagerman B J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Jun; 31(2):166-77. PubMed ID: 3398490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Do we hear size or sound? Balls dropped on plates. Grassi M Percept Psychophys; 2005 Feb; 67(2):274-84. PubMed ID: 15971691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Studies on the effect of frequency distortions on the expressive content of speech impressions]. Silbereisen RK Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1974; 21(4):637-61. PubMed ID: 4440020 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. You can't say that: using social media in the healthcare setting requires sound judgment. DeJohn P OR Manager; 2014 Dec; 30(12):26-7. PubMed ID: 25587622 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Category judgments of loudnesses in the absence of an experimenter-induced identification function: sequential effects and power-function fit. Ward LM J Exp Psychol; 1972 Jul; 94(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 5044270 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. [Semantic scales for the evaluation of noise (II). Subjacent dimensions in subjective judgments of sound stimuli]. Verzini de Romera AM; Biassoni de Serra EC; Suárez de Bonet MD Acta Psiquiatr Psicol Am Lat; 1984 Dec; 30(4):265-73. PubMed ID: 6535380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]