These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39014036)
1. Generative AI makes for better scientific writing - but beware the pitfalls. Liao Z; Zhang C Nature; 2024 Jul; 631(8021):505. PubMed ID: 39014036 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists. Else H Nature; 2023 Jan; 613(7944):423. PubMed ID: 36635510 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Keep authorship for writers. Baskin TI Nature; 2018 Oct; 562(7728):494. PubMed ID: 30356192 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. ChatGPT use shows that the grant-application system is broken. Parrilla JM Nature; 2023 Nov; 623(7986):443. PubMed ID: 37833483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A review of top cardiology and cardiovascular medicine journal guidelines regarding the use of generative artificial intelligence tools in scientific writing. Inam M; Sheikh S; Minhas AMK; Vaughan EM; Krittanawong C; Samad Z; Lavie CJ; Khoja A; D'Cruze M; Slipczuk L; Alarakhiya F; Naseem A; Haider AH; Virani SS Curr Probl Cardiol; 2024 Mar; 49(3):102387. PubMed ID: 38185435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Poor English skills? New AIs help researchers to write better. Katsnelson A Nature; 2022 Sep; 609(7925):208-209. PubMed ID: 36038730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Ten steps for writing a successful scientific article. Pereira MG Epidemiol Serv Saude; 2017; 26(3):661-664. PubMed ID: 28977190 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Should scientists delegate their writing to ChatGPT? Basgier C; Sharma S Nature; 2023 Dec; 624(7992):523. PubMed ID: 38114679 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Authorship: Who's on first? Dance A Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7417):591-3. PubMed ID: 23025001 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use. Nature; 2023 Jan; 613(7945):612. PubMed ID: 36694020 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. How to write (and how not to write) a scientific review article. Sanders DA Clin Biochem; 2020 Jul; 81():65-68. PubMed ID: 32371050 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Manuscript Architect: a Web application for scientific writing in virtual interdisciplinary groups. Pietrobon R; Nielsen KC; Steele SM; Menezes AP; Martins H; Jacobs DO BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2005 Jun; 5():15. PubMed ID: 15960855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Text Recycling in Scientific Writing. Moskovitz C Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Jun; 25(3):813-851. PubMed ID: 29546574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ghostwriters in the scientific world. Yadav S; Rawal G Pan Afr Med J; 2018; 30():217. PubMed ID: 30574236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ghostwriting revisited: new perspectives but few solutions in sight. PLoS Medicine Editors PLoS Med; 2011 Aug; 8(8):e1001084. PubMed ID: 21912518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Who's on first? Schwab IR Ophthalmology; 2013 Sep; 120(9):1718-9. PubMed ID: 24001529 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of AI and ChatGPT on research reporting. Mojadeddi ZM; Rosenberg J N Z Med J; 2023 May; 136(1575):60-64. PubMed ID: 37167941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]