These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39014549)
1. Adhesion of Candida albicans on PTFE membranes used in guided bone regeneration. Al-Asfour A; Karched M; Qasim SSB; Zafiropoulos GG Clin Exp Dent Res; 2024 Aug; 10(4):e902. PubMed ID: 39014549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro evaluation of barrier function against oral bacteria of dense and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membranes for guided bone regeneration. Trobos M; Juhlin A; Shah FA; Hoffman M; Sahlin H; Dahlin C Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Oct; 20(5):738-748. PubMed ID: 30039909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of e-PTFE and alkali-cellulose membranes for guided bone regeneration. Salata LA; Hatton PV; Devlin AJ; Craig GT; Brook IM Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Feb; 12(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 11168272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Initial attachment of osteoblasts to various guided bone regeneration membranes: an in vitro study. Wang HL; Miyauchi M; Takata T J Periodontal Res; 2002 Oct; 37(5):340-4. PubMed ID: 12366856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy of high-density versus semipermeable PTFE membranes in an elderly experimental model. Marouf HA; El-Guindi HM Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Feb; 89(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 10673651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adhesion of Oral Bacteria to Commercial d-PTFE Membranes: Polymer Microstructure Makes a Difference. Begić G; Petković Didović M; Lučić Blagojević S; Jelovica Badovinac I; Žigon J; Perčić M; Cvijanović Peloza O; Gobin I Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Mar; 23(6):. PubMed ID: 35328404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biofilm formation of Candida albicans on implant overdenture materials and its removal. Li J; Hirota K; Goto T; Yumoto H; Miyake Y; Ichikawa T J Dent; 2012 Aug; 40(8):686-92. PubMed ID: 22580351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the performance of natural latex membranes prepared with different procedures and PTFE membrane in guided bone regeneration (GBR) in rabbits. Moura JM; Ferreira JF; Marques L; Holgado L; Graeff CF; Kinoshita A J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2014 Sep; 25(9):2111-20. PubMed ID: 24849612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of an antibacterial membrane on osteoblast-like cells in vitro. Ye J; Yao Q; Mo A; Nie J; Liu W; Ye C; Chen X Int J Nanomedicine; 2011; 6():1853-61. PubMed ID: 21931481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Polytetrafluoroethylene added to acrylic resin: surface properties and Candida albicans adherence. Straioto FG; Alves R; Filho AP; Del Bel Cury AA Am J Dent; 2010 Aug; 23(4):201-4. PubMed ID: 21250569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term clinical evaluation and SEM analysis of the e-PTFE and titanium membranes in guided tissue regeneration. Toygar HU; Guzeldemir E; Cilasun U; Akkor D; Arpak N J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2009 Nov; 91(2):772-779. PubMed ID: 19572297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro evaluation of various bioabsorbable and nonresorbable barrier membranes for guided tissue regeneration. Kasaj A; Reichert C; Götz H; Röhrig B; Smeets R; Willershausen B Head Face Med; 2008 Oct; 4():22. PubMed ID: 18854011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modulation of gene expression and bone formation by expanded and dense polytetrafluoroethylene membranes during guided bone regeneration: An experimental study. Turri A; Omar O; Trobos M; Thomsen P; Dahlin C Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2024 Apr; 26(2):266-280. PubMed ID: 37357340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Expanded vs. dense polytetrafluoroethylene membranes in vertical ridge augmentation around dental implants: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Ronda M; Rebaudi A; Torelli L; Stacchi C Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jul; 25(7):859-66. PubMed ID: 23560678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In Vivo Analysis of the Biocompatibility and Macrophage Response of a Non-Resorbable PTFE Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration. Korzinskas T; Jung O; Smeets R; Stojanovic S; Najman S; Glenske K; Hahn M; Wenisch S; Schnettler R; Barbeck M Int J Mol Sci; 2018 Sep; 19(10):. PubMed ID: 30262765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Guided bone regeneration with tripolyphosphate cross-linked asymmetric chitosan membrane. Ma S; Chen Z; Qiao F; Sun Y; Yang X; Deng X; Cen L; Cai Q; Wu M; Zhang X; Gao P J Dent; 2014 Dec; 42(12):1603-12. PubMed ID: 25193523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of surface roughness and dimorphism on the adhesion of Candida albicans to the surface of resins: scanning electron microscope analyses of mode and number of adhesions. Mayahara M; Kataoka R; Arimoto T; Tamaki Y; Yamaguchi N; Watanabe Y; Yamasaki Y; Miyazaki T J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 Nov; 5(4):307-12. PubMed ID: 23766294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term outcome of implants placed with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using resorbable and non-resorbable membranes after 12-14 years. Jung RE; Fenner N; Hämmerle CH; Zitzmann NU Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1065-73. PubMed ID: 22697628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]