These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39015548)

  • 1. People believe political opponents accept blatant moral wrongs, fueling partisan divides.
    Puryear C; Kubin E; Schein C; Bigman YE; Ekstrom P; Gray K
    PNAS Nexus; 2024 Jul; 3(7):pgae244. PubMed ID: 39015548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exaggerated meta-perceptions predict intergroup hostility between American political partisans.
    Moore-Berg SL; Ankori-Karlinsky LO; Hameiri B; Bruneau E
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Jun; 117(26):14864-14872. PubMed ID: 32527858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Partisan self-interest is an important driver for people's support for the regulation of targeted political advertising.
    Baum K; Meissner S; Krasnova H
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0250506. PubMed ID: 33979358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intellectual humility and perceptions of political opponents.
    Stanley ML; Sinclair AH; Seli P
    J Pers; 2020 Dec; 88(6):1196-1216. PubMed ID: 32484911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceiving political polarization in the United States: party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide.
    Westfall J; Van Boven L; Chambers JR; Judd CM
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Mar; 10(2):145-58. PubMed ID: 25910386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using "balanced pragmatism" in political discussions increases cross-partisan respect.
    Puryear C; Gray K
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 May; 153(5):1189-1212. PubMed ID: 38451700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Personal experiences bridge moral and political divides better than facts.
    Kubin E; Puryear C; Schein C; Gray K
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Feb; 118(6):. PubMed ID: 33495361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Belief change in times of crisis: Providing facts about COVID-19-induced inequalities closes the partisan divide but fuels intra-partisan polarization about inequality.
    Mijs JJB; de Koster W; van der Waal J
    Soc Sci Res; 2022 May; 104():102692. PubMed ID: 35400387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Moral-Language Use by U.S. Political Elites.
    Wang SN; Inbar Y
    Psychol Sci; 2021 Jan; 32(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 33306432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. People See Political Opponents as More Stupid Than Evil.
    Hartman R; Hester N; Gray K
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2023 Jul; 49(7):1014-1027. PubMed ID: 35481435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Putting Within-Country Political Differences in (Global) Perspective.
    Garcia-Rada X; Norton MI
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231794. PubMed ID: 32324745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Seeing beyond political affiliations: The mediating role of perceived moral foundations on the partisan similarity-liking effect.
    Bruchmann K; Koopmann-Holm B; Scherer A
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202101. PubMed ID: 30157213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reducing political polarization in the United States with a mobile chat platform.
    Combs A; Tierney G; Guay B; Merhout F; Bail CA; Hillygus DS; Volfovsky A
    Nat Hum Behav; 2023 Sep; 7(9):1454-1461. PubMed ID: 37604989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Opposing views: associations of political polarization, political party affiliation, and social trust with COVID-19 vaccination intent and receipt.
    Dolman AJ; Fraser T; Panagopoulos C; Aldrich DP; Kim D
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2023 Mar; 45(1):36-39. PubMed ID: 35077546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An ideological asymmetry in the diffusion of moralized content on social media among political leaders.
    Brady WJ; Wills JA; Burkart D; Jost JT; Van Bavel JJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Oct; 148(10):1802-1813. PubMed ID: 30589291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Generically partisan: Polarization in political communication.
    Novoa G; Echelbarger M; Gelman A; Gelman SA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Nov; 120(47):e2309361120. PubMed ID: 37956300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correcting inaccurate metaperceptions reduces Americans' support for partisan violence.
    Mernyk JS; Pink SL; Druckman JN; Willer R
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Apr; 119(16):e2116851119. PubMed ID: 35412915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Political polarization of conservation issues in the era of COVID-19: An examination of partisan perspectives and priorities in the United States.
    Casola WR; Beall JM; Nils Peterson M; Larson LR; Brent Jackson S; Stevenson KT
    J Nat Conserv; 2022 Jun; 67():126176. PubMed ID: 35370533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Political probity increases trust in government: Evidence from randomized survey experiments.
    Martin A; Orr R; Peyton K; Faulkner N
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0225818. PubMed ID: 32092084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Morality and politics: Comparing alternate theories.
    Miles A; Vaisey S
    Soc Sci Res; 2015 Sep; 53():252-69. PubMed ID: 26188452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.