These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3901848)

  • 1. Infectivity of vascular sutures.
    Scher KS; Bernstein JM; Jones CW
    Am Surg; 1985 Oct; 51(10):577-9. PubMed ID: 3901848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Abdominal wound closure. A comparison of polydioxanone, polypropylene, and Teflon-coated braided Dacron sutures.
    Kon ND; Meredith JW; Poole GV; Martin MB; Kawamoto E; Myers RT
    Am Surg; 1984 Oct; 50(10):549-51. PubMed ID: 6237599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cyclic testing of pullout sutures and micro-mitek suture anchors in flexor digitorum profundus tendon distal fixation.
    Latendresse K; Dona E; Scougall PJ; Schreuder FB; Puchert E; Walsh WR
    J Hand Surg Am; 2005 May; 30(3):471-8. PubMed ID: 15925154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro adherence of bacteria to sutures in cardiac surgery.
    Shuhaiber H; Chugh T; Burns G
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1989; 30(5):749-53. PubMed ID: 2530235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mechanical and handling properties of braided polyblend polyethylene sutures in comparison to braided polyester and monofilament polydioxanone sutures.
    Wüst DM; Meyer DC; Favre P; Gerber C
    Arthroscopy; 2006 Nov; 22(11):1146-53. PubMed ID: 17084288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of monofilament suture in vascular surgery.
    Dean RH; Pinkerton JA; Foster JH
    Surgery; 1975 Aug; 78(2):165-8. PubMed ID: 1098190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical and clinical performance of a new synthetic monofilament absorbable suture.
    Rodeheaver GT; Beltran KA; Green CW; Faulkner BC; Stiles BM; Stanimir GW; Traeland H; Fried GM; Brown HC; Edlich RF
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1996; 6(3-4):181-98. PubMed ID: 10167360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does Suture Type Influence Bacterial Retention and Biofilm Formation After Irrigation in a Mouse Model?
    Markel DC; Bergum C; Wu B; Bou-Akl T; Ren W
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Jan; 477(1):116-126. PubMed ID: 30794234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Enclosure of bacteria within capillary multifilament sutures as protection against leukocytes.
    Osterberg B
    Acta Chir Scand; 1983; 149(7):663-8. PubMed ID: 6650080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of capillary multifilament sutures on the antibacterial action of inflammatory cells in infected wounds.
    Osterberg B
    Acta Chir Scand; 1983; 149(8):751-7. PubMed ID: 6364664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Decreased Bacterial Adherence, Biofilm Formation, and Tissue Reactivity of Barbed Monofilament Suture in an In Vivo Contaminated Wound Model.
    Morris MR; Bergum C; Jackson N; Markel DC
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Apr; 32(4):1272-1279. PubMed ID: 28065625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A biomechanical analysis of suture materials and their influence on a four-strand flexor tendon repair.
    Lawrence TM; Davis TR
    J Hand Surg Am; 2005 Jul; 30(4):836-41. PubMed ID: 16039381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of suture materials on bacterial survival in infected wounds. An experimental study.
    Osterberg B; Blomstedt B
    Acta Chir Scand; 1979; 145(7):431-4. PubMed ID: 539325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bacterial adherence to suture materials.
    Masini BD; Stinner DJ; Waterman SM; Wenke JC
    J Surg Educ; 2011; 68(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 21338964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bacteria adhere less to barbed monofilament than braided sutures in a contaminated wound model.
    Fowler JR; Perkins TA; Buttaro BA; Truant AL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Feb; 471(2):665-71. PubMed ID: 23001503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of the strength of knots tied by hand and at laparoscopy.
    Kadirkamanathan SS; Shelton JC; Hepworth CC; Laufer JG; Swain CP
    J Am Coll Surg; 1996 Jan; 182(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 8542089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic knot security.
    Sedlack JD; Williams VM; DeSimone J; Page D; Ghosh BC
    Surg Laparosc Endosc; 1996 Apr; 6(2):144-6. PubMed ID: 8680638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bacterial adherence to surgical sutures: can antibacterial-coated sutures reduce the risk of microbial contamination?
    Edmiston CE; Seabrook GR; Goheen MP; Krepel CJ; Johnson CP; Lewis BD; Brown KR; Towne JB
    J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Oct; 203(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17000391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative analysis of the biomechanical behaviour of five flexor tendon core sutures.
    Viinikainen A; Göransson H; Huovinen K; Kellomäki M; Rokkanen P
    J Hand Surg Br; 2004 Dec; 29(6):536-43. PubMed ID: 15542212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Repair of zone II flexor digitorum profundus lacerations using varying suture sizes: a comparative biomechanical study.
    Alavanja G; Dailey E; Mass DP
    J Hand Surg Am; 2005 May; 30(3):448-54. PubMed ID: 15925150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.