These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39020117)

  • 1. Hospital charges for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy compared to robotic sleeve gastrectomy: a multicenter study.
    Brown A; Vu AH; Carey D; Lazar D; Sullivan B; Ayres J; Schroder J; Gujral A; Tursunova N; Ferzli GS; Cheema F; Tchokouani L
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Sep; 38(9):5304-5309. PubMed ID: 39020117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing the Efficacy of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Zhao S; Fu Y; Zhou J; Sun L; Li R; Tian Z; Cheng Y; Wang J; Wang W; Wang D
    Obes Surg; 2024 Sep; 34(9):3493-3505. PubMed ID: 39042305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robotic vs. Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in Adolescents; Reality or Hype.
    Pepper VK; Rager TM; Diefenbach KA; Raval MV; Teich S; Michalsky MP
    Obes Surg; 2016 Aug; 26(8):1912-7. PubMed ID: 26729282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in the Super-obese.
    Nasser H; Ivanics T; Ranjal RS; Leonard-Murali S; Genaw J
    J Surg Res; 2020 May; 249():34-41. PubMed ID: 31918328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a MBSAQIP analysis.
    Fazl Alizadeh R; Li S; Inaba CS; Dinicu AI; Hinojosa MW; Smith BR; Stamos MJ; Nguyen NT
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Mar; 33(3):917-922. PubMed ID: 30128823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotic versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Magouliotis DE; Tasiopoulou VS; Sioka E; Zacharoulis D
    Obes Surg; 2017 Jan; 27(1):245-253. PubMed ID: 27815863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A superior approach? The role of robotic sleeve gastrectomy in patients with super super obesity using the 2019-2022 MBSAQIP database.
    Zevallos A; Cornejo J; Brown J; Sarmiento J; Shojaeian F; Mokhtari-Esbuie F; Coker A; Adrales G; Li C; Sebastian R
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Aug; 38(8):4594-4603. PubMed ID: 38862824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcomes following robot-assisted versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: the New York State experience.
    Burstein MD; Myneni AA; Towle-Miller LM; Simmonds I; Gray J; Schwaitzberg SD; Noyes K; Hoffman AB
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Sep; 36(9):6878-6885. PubMed ID: 35157123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost analysis of robotic sleeve gastrectomy (R-SG) compared with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (L-SG) in a single academic center: debunking a myth!
    El Chaar M; Gacke J; Ringold S; Stoltzfus J
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2019 May; 15(5):675-679. PubMed ID: 31043334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Outcome Trends Over Time: Are We Improving?
    Edwards MA; Falstin M; Alomari M; Spaulding A; Brennan ER
    Obes Surg; 2024 Jul; 34(7):2596-2606. PubMed ID: 38844716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the morbidity, weight loss, and relative costs between robotic and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for the treatment of obesity in Brazil.
    Schraibman V; Macedo AL; Epstein MG; Soares MY; Maccapani G; Matos D; Rizzo LV; Goldman SM
    Obes Surg; 2014 Sep; 24(9):1420-4. PubMed ID: 24658977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcomes in conventional laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted revisional bariatric surgery: a retrospective, case-controlled study of the MBSAQIP database.
    Acevedo E; Mazzei M; Zhao H; Lu X; Edwards MA
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Apr; 34(4):1573-1584. PubMed ID: 31209611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 30-day outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: First analysis based on MBSAQIP.
    Lundberg PW; Stoltzfus J; El Chaar M
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2019 Jan; 15(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 30497847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic sleeve gastrectomy: experience of 134 cases and comparison with a systematic review of the laparoscopic approach.
    Romero RJ; Kosanovic R; Rabaza JR; Seetharamaiah R; Donkor C; Gallas M; Gonzalez AM
    Obes Surg; 2013 Nov; 23(11):1743-52. PubMed ID: 23904057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is routine post-sleeve gastrografin needed? Profile of 98 cases.
    Assakran BS; Alromaih AH; Alashkar AH; AlGhasham FS; Alqunai MS
    BMC Res Notes; 2020 Apr; 13(1):219. PubMed ID: 32299510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robotic versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a review of the current evidence.
    Tasiopoulou VS; Svokos AA; Svokos KA; Zacharoulis D; Magouliotis DE
    Minerva Chir; 2018 Feb; 73(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 29243456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Thirty day outcomes for laparoscopic versus robotic sleeve gastrectomy: Does the stapler matter?
    Samreen S; Lee SH; Liu Y; Zheng F; Edwards M
    Am J Surg; 2024 Nov; 237():115801. PubMed ID: 38944623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do advances in technology translate to improved outcomes? Comparing robotic bariatric surgery outcomes over two-time intervals utilizing the MBSAQIP database.
    Coker A; Sebastian R; Tatum J; Cornejo J; Zevallos A; Li C; Schweitzer M; Adrales G
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Oct; 37(10):7970-7979. PubMed ID: 37439819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Elective robotic-assisted bariatric surgery: Is it worth the money? A national database analysis.
    Pokala B; Samuel S; Yanala U; Armijo P; Kothari V
    Am J Surg; 2020 Dec; 220(6):1445-1450. PubMed ID: 32917364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a propensity score-matched comparative analysis using the 2015-2016 MBSAQIP database.
    Sebastian R; Howell MH; Chang KH; Adrales G; Magnuson T; Schweitzer M; Nguyen H
    Surg Endosc; 2019 May; 33(5):1600-1612. PubMed ID: 30225604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.