These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39020221)

  • 1. Patient dose and associated exposure parameters in pelvic x-ray examinations: dependence on radiographic system.
    Welarathna S; Velautham S; Sarasanandarajah S
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2024 Aug; 63(3):433-442. PubMed ID: 39020221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Towards the establishment of national diagnostic reference levels for chest x-ray examinations in Sri Lanka: a multi-centric study.
    Welarathna S; Velautham S; Sarasanandarajah S
    J Radiol Prot; 2023 Oct; 43(4):. PubMed ID: 37738966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimization of dose and image quality for computed radiography and digital radiography.
    Aldrich JE; Duran E; Dunlop P; Mayo JR
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Jun; 19(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 16511674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Towards the establishment of national diagnostic reference levels for abdomen, KUB, and lumbar spine x-ray examinations in Sri Lanka: a multi-centric study.
    Welarathna S; Velautham S; Sarasanandarajah S
    J Radiol Prot; 2024 Apr; 44(2):. PubMed ID: 38537259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the performance of digital x-ray systems in pelvis radiography.
    Jreije A; Krynke L; Gricienė B; Rimkus B; Dementavičienė J; Skovorodko K
    J Radiol Prot; 2024 Jul; 44(3):. PubMed ID: 38950524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. LOW BMI PATIENT DOSE IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY.
    Efthymiou FO; Metaxas VI; Dimitroukas CP; Panayiotakis GS
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Jul; 189(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 32043128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High kilovoltage digital exposure techniques and patient dosimetry.
    Fauber TL; Cohen TF; Dempsey MC
    Radiol Technol; 2011; 82(6):501-10. PubMed ID: 21771934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. PATIENT DOSE ASSESSMENT AND OPTIMISATION OF PELVIC RADIOGRAPHY WITH COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS.
    Abbeyquaye D; Inkoom S; Hammond NB; Fletcher JJ; Botwe BO
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2021 Aug; 195(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 34320643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimates of Patient Radiation Doses in Digital Radiography Using DICOM Information at a Large Teaching Hospital in Oman.
    Suliman II
    J Digit Imaging; 2020 Feb; 33(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 30891650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiation dose in pelvic imaging.
    Brindhaban A; Al Khalifah K
    Radiol Technol; 2005; 77(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 16218020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance evaluation of two computed radiography systems and patient dose in pelvic examination.
    Elshiekh E; Suliman II; Habbani F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):392-6. PubMed ID: 25836691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. PATIENT DOSE IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY UTILISING BMI CLASSIFICATION.
    Metaxas VI; Messaris GA; Lekatou AN; Petsas TG; Panayiotakis GS
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Aug; 184(2):155-167. PubMed ID: 30452729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of patient doses for routine digital radiography procedures toward establishing an institutional diagnostic reference levels: A case study in Sri Lanka.
    Welarathna S; Velautham S; Wanninayake M; Sarasanandarajah S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Dec; 23(12):e13852. PubMed ID: 36448529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of acquisition parameters on dose and image quality optimisation in paediatric pelvis radiography-A phantom study.
    Mohammed Ali A; Hogg P; Abuzaid M; England A
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Sep; 118():130-137. PubMed ID: 31439232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of added filtration on radiation dose and image quality in digital radiography of newborns.
    Papadakis AE; Giannakaki V; Hatzidaki E; Damilakis J
    Pediatr Radiol; 2023 Sep; 53(10):2060-2068. PubMed ID: 37310445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An approach for the online determination of Entrance Surface Air Kerma (ESAK) from Kerma Area product (P
    Suliman II
    Phys Eng Sci Med; 2022 Dec; 45(4):1055-1061. PubMed ID: 36107385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient dose in digital projection radiography.
    Compagnone G; Pagan L; Baleni MC; Calzolaio FL; Barozzi L; Bergamini C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):135-7. PubMed ID: 18252850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Local diagnostic reference levels for typical radiographic procedures.
    Tonkopi E; Daniels C; Gale MJ; Schofield SC; Sorhaindo VA; Vanlarkin JL
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2012 Nov; 63(4):237-41. PubMed ID: 22136965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of testing of collimator and beam alignment, focal spot size with slit camera, and tube current consistency using computed radiography and conventional screen-film systems.
    Meechai T; Chousangsuntorn K; Owasirikul W; Mongkolsuk M; Iampa W
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 20(6):160-169. PubMed ID: 31095873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.