These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39022328)

  • 21. Do item-writing flaws reduce examinations psychometric quality?
    Pais J; Silva A; Guimarães B; Povo A; Coelho E; Silva-Pereira F; Lourinho I; Ferreira MA; Severo M
    BMC Res Notes; 2016 Aug; 9(1):399. PubMed ID: 27516160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Choosing medical assessments: Does the multiple-choice question make the grade?
    Pham H; Trigg M; Wu S; O'Connell A; Harry C; Barnard J; Devitt P
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2018; 31(2):65-71. PubMed ID: 30531047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Medical students create multiple-choice questions for learning in pathology education: a pilot study.
    Grainger R; Dai W; Osborne E; Kenwright D
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Aug; 18(1):201. PubMed ID: 30134898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The impact of item-writing flaws and item complexity on examination item difficulty and discrimination value.
    Rush BR; Rankin DC; White BJ
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Sep; 16(1):250. PubMed ID: 27681933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effectiveness of longitudinal faculty development programs on MCQs items writing skills: A follow-up study.
    Abdulghani HM; Irshad M; Haque S; Ahmad T; Sattar K; Khalil MS
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0185895. PubMed ID: 29016659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Education techniques for lifelong learning: writing multiple-choice questions for continuing medical education activities and self-assessment modules.
    Collins J
    Radiographics; 2006; 26(2):543-51. PubMed ID: 16549616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluating the Quality of Multiple Choice Question in Paediatric Dentistry Postgraduate Examinations.
    Kowash M; Hussein I; Al Halabi M
    Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J; 2019 May; 19(2):e135-e141. PubMed ID: 31538012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of Multiple-Choice Questions by Item Analysis, from an Online Internal Assessment of 6
    Bhattacherjee S; Mukherjee A; Bhandari K; Rout AJ
    Indian J Community Med; 2022; 47(1):92-95. PubMed ID: 35368481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical vignettes improve performance in anatomy practical assessment.
    Ikah DS; Finn GM; Swamy M; White PM; McLachlan JC
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 24953193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. PeerWise and Pathology: Discontinuing a teaching innovation that did not achieve its potential.
    Smith CD; Dai A; Kenwright D; Grainger R
    MedEdPublish (2016); 2020; 9():27. PubMed ID: 38058910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Using Automatic Item Generation to Improve the Quality of MCQ Distractors.
    Lai H; Gierl MJ; Touchie C; Pugh D; Boulais AP; De Champlain A
    Teach Learn Med; 2016; 28(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 26849247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison between MCQ, Extended matching questions (EMQ) and Script concordance test (SCT) for assessment among first-year medical students - A pilot study.
    Nalini YC; Manivasakan S; Pai DR
    J Educ Health Promot; 2024; 13():52. PubMed ID: 38549656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Distractor Efficiency in an Item Pool for a Statistics Classroom Exam: Assessing Its Relation With Item Cognitive Level Classified According to Bloom's Taxonomy.
    Testa S; Toscano A; Rosato R
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1585. PubMed ID: 30210409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of Multiple Choice and Short Essay Question items in Basic Medical Sciences.
    Baig M; Ali SK; Ali S; Huda N
    Pak J Med Sci; 2014 Jan; 30(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 24639820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Psychometrics of Multiple Choice Questions with Non-Functioning Distracters: Implications to Medical Education.
    Deepak KK; Al-Umran KU; AI-Sheikh MH; Dkoli BV; Al-Rubaish A
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2015; 59(4):428-35. PubMed ID: 27530011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The frequency of item writing flaws in multiple-choice questions used in high stakes nursing assessments.
    Tarrant M; Knierim A; Hayes SK; Ware J
    Nurse Educ Today; 2006 Dec; 26(8):662-71. PubMed ID: 17014932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessment Question Characteristics Predict Medical Student Performance in General Pathology.
    Hernandez T; Magid MS; Polydorides AD
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2021 Oct; 145(10):1280-1288. PubMed ID: 33450752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Relations of the Number of Functioning Distractors With the Item Difficulty Index and the Item Discrimination Power in the Multiple Choice Questions.
    Chauhan GR; Chauhan BR; Vaza JV; Chauhan PR
    Cureus; 2023 Jul; 15(7):e42492. PubMed ID: 37644928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Examining Bloom's Taxonomy in Multiple Choice Questions: Students' Approach to Questions.
    Stringer JK; Santen SA; Lee E; Rawls M; Bailey J; Richards A; Perera RA; Biskobing D
    Med Sci Educ; 2021 Aug; 31(4):1311-1317. PubMed ID: 34457973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.