These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Breast lesions: evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging and with T2*-weighted first-pass perfusion MR imaging. Kvistad KA; Rydland J; Vainio J; Smethurst HB; Lundgren S; Fjøsne HE; Haraldseth O Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):545-53. PubMed ID: 10924584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Work in progress. El Yousef SJ; Duchesneau RH; Alfidi RJ; Haaga JR; Bryan PJ; LiPuma JP Radiology; 1984 Mar; 150(3):761-6. PubMed ID: 6695077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contrast-enhanced MR mammography for evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed unilateral breast cancer or high-risk lesions. Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Padula S; Altomari F; Moriconi E; Pronio AM; Kirchin MA; Passariello R Radiology; 2007 Jun; 243(3):670-80. PubMed ID: 17446524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MR Imaging as an Additional Screening Modality for the Detection of Breast Cancer in Women Aged 50-75 Years with Extremely Dense Breasts: The DENSE Trial Study Design. Emaus MJ; Bakker MF; Peeters PH; Loo CE; Mann RM; de Jong MD; Bisschops RH; Veltman J; Duvivier KM; Lobbes MB; Pijnappel RM; Karssemeijer N; de Koning HJ; van den Bosch MA; Monninkhof EM; Mali WP; Veldhuis WB; van Gils CH Radiology; 2015 Nov; 277(2):527-37. PubMed ID: 26110667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA enhancement: comparison with mammography and ultrasonography. Hachiya J; Seki T; Okada M; Nitatori T; Korenaga T; Furuya Y Radiat Med; 1991; 9(6):232-40. PubMed ID: 1668410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of early breast cancer: an overview and future prospects. Zhou XH; Gordon R Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1989; 17(3):203-55. PubMed ID: 2673660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. New methods for imaging the breast: techniques, findings, and potential. Adler DD; Wahl RL AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Jan; 164(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 7998538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [MR-mammography: current status and perspectives]. Funke M; Fischer U; Grabbe E Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 May; 6(3):130-5. PubMed ID: 8679736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic resonance imaging of the human female breast. Current status and pathologic correlations. Powell DE; Stelling CB Pathol Annu; 1988; 23 Pt 1():159-94. PubMed ID: 2838793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MR imaging of the breast for cancer evaluation. Current status and future directions. Stelling CB Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1187-204. PubMed ID: 7480665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Typical and unusual findings in MR mammography]. Bick U Rofo; 2000 May; 172(5):415-28. PubMed ID: 10874968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The feasibility of magnetic resonance tomography in the diagnosis of non-palpable breast tumors]. Zapf S; Halbsguth A; Brunier A; Mitze M; Klemencic J; Wilhelm K Rofo; 1991 Jan; 154(1):106-10. PubMed ID: 1846678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Carcinoma of the breast: detection with MR imaging versus xeromammography. Turner DA; Alcorn FS; Shorey WD; Stelling CB; Mategrano VC; Merten CW; Silver B; Economou SG; Straus AK; Witt TR Radiology; 1988 Jul; 168(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 3289095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Nuclear magnetic resonance tomography of the breast: diagnosis, differential diagnosis, problems and possible solutions. II: Diagnosis]. Kaiser W; Zeitler E Rofo; 1986 May; 144(5):572-9. PubMed ID: 3012684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]