These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3902326)
1. [Modification of the image quality of i.v. DSA by the iodine concentration of the contrast medium]. Langer M; Felix R; Keysser R; Speck U; Banzer D Digitale Bilddiagn; 1985 Sep; 5(3):154-9. PubMed ID: 3902326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Urography with monomeric and dimeric nonionic contrast media: comparative, randomized, double-blind study of iotrolan 280 and iopromide 300. Taenzer V; Wenzel-Hora BI Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():116-8. PubMed ID: 2568778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Initial experience with a nonionic, dimeric contrast medium (iotrolan) in direct and indirect arteriography: a randomized, intraindividual double-blind study in 60 patients. Hagen B; Wenzel-Hora BI Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():54-60. PubMed ID: 2568808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Iopromide, a new contrast medium for angiography. Clinical study and comparison with other low-osmolar contrast media]. Steidle B; Wolf KJ; Banzer D; Seyferath W Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1984 Aug; 109(34):1275-8. PubMed ID: 6381018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Iopentol compared with iohexol in carotid angiography. A double blind crossover test of a new non-ionic contrast medium. Nakstad PH; Skalpe IO; Bakke SJ; Aanonsen NO; Ganes T Acta Radiol; 1990 Mar; 31(2):221-2. PubMed ID: 2372469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Urography with non-ionic contrast media: II. Diagnostic quality and tolerance of iopromide in comparison with ioxaglate. Taenzer V; Meiisel P; Hartwig P Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():153-5. PubMed ID: 6139071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [A randomized, double-blind clinical trial of 2 nonionic contrast media for myelography]. Lovrencić M; Klanfar Z; Jakovac I Lijec Vjesn; 1986 Apr; 108(4):141-6. PubMed ID: 3520199 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Iopromide versus ioglicinate in dynamic computer tomography--a randomized controlled double-blind study]. Lindner R; Gailer H; Richter EI Rontgenpraxis; 1984 Oct; 37(10):362-6. PubMed ID: 6390726 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of iohexol with meglumine-Na diatrizoate for intravenous digital subtraction angiography. Seeger JF; Carmody RF; Smith JR; Horsley WW; Criss E Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():85-8. PubMed ID: 6382940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital subtraction angiography. Comparison of meglumine-Na diatrizoate with iohexol. Sackett JF; Bergsjordet B; Seeger JF; Cacayorin ED Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S58-61. PubMed ID: 2579044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast media in intravenous digital subtraction angiography (initial experience). Seyferth W; Zeitler E Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():125-8. PubMed ID: 6139067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Clinical study of iohexol in a double-blind trial with ioxaglate in the angiography of the lower extremities]. Simunić S; Valinger-Petrović B; Radanović B; Cavka K; Stojanović J Lijec Vjesn; 1986 Apr; 108(4):147-9. PubMed ID: 3520200 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Iohexol and ioxithalamate for intravenous urography. A comparative parallel study. Egeblad M; Nielsen NT; Fries J; Laulund S Eur J Radiol; 1985 Aug; 5(3):240-2. PubMed ID: 3896801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Recent development in non-ionic contrast media. Hagen B Ann Radiol (Paris); 1989; 32(1):38-9. PubMed ID: 2742324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tolerance of iopromide in angiography: a multicenter study. Langer M; Behrends B; Langer R; Eichstädt H; Jänicke UA Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():61-6. PubMed ID: 2568810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Urography with non-ionic contrast media: I. Diagnostic quality and tolerance of iohexol in comparison with meglumine amidotrizoate. Taenzer V; Heep H; Clauss W Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():148-52. PubMed ID: 6139070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Renal excretion of iopromide and iopamidol after intravenous administration in digital subtraction angiography. Mützel W; Langer M; Keysser R Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():101-4. PubMed ID: 2568774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Experimental urography in dogs: diagnostic quality and pharmacokinetic behavior of iotrolan in comparison to nonionic and ionic, monomeric contrast media. Nauert C; Mützel W Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():82-7. PubMed ID: 2568814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Cerebral angiography with a new low osmolarity contrast medium (Hexabrix). Analysis of 3500 cerebral angiograms with 7 contrast media]. Bartko D; Brezná M; Koník I; Dornetzhuberová M Cesk Neurol Neurochir; 1982 Jan; 45(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 7060172 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Determination of hematocrit and iodine concentrations following intravenous bolus administration of ionic and nonionic monomeric and dimeric contrast media--an animal experimental study]. Claussen CD; Duda SH; Weinmann HJ Rofo; 1988 Nov; 149(5):529-33. PubMed ID: 2848287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]