These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3902333)

  • 1. Does a computer-based ECG-recorder interpret electrocardiograms more efficiently than physicians?
    Jakobsson A; Ohlin P; Pahlm O
    Clin Physiol; 1985 Oct; 5(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 3902333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Computerized ECG: Friend and Foe.
    Smulyan H
    Am J Med; 2019 Feb; 132(2):153-160. PubMed ID: 30205084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Computer-based interpretation of ECG--guiding or misleading?].
    Morisbak B; Gjesdal K
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Sep; 119(23):3441-4. PubMed ID: 10553343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The emergency department versus the computer: which is the better electrocardiographer?
    Snyder CS; Fenrich AL; Friedman RA; Macias C; O'Reilly K; Kertesz NJ
    Pediatr Cardiol; 2003; 24(4):364-8. PubMed ID: 12457259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Training and competency evaluation for interpretation of 12-lead electrocardiograms: recommendations from the American College of Physicians.
    Salerno SM; Alguire PC; Waxman HS;
    Ann Intern Med; 2003 May; 138(9):747-50. PubMed ID: 12729430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of computer-assisted electrocardiographic interpretation on physicians' diagnostic decisions.
    Hillson SD; Connelly DP; Liu Y
    Med Decis Making; 1995; 15(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 7783570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Competency in interpretation of 12-lead electrocardiograms: a summary and appraisal of published evidence.
    Salerno SM; Alguire PC; Waxman HS
    Ann Intern Med; 2003 May; 138(9):751-60. PubMed ID: 12729431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Fully automatic computer-analysis of electrocardiograms in clinical routine (author's transl)].
    Mengden HJ; Just H; Kaspar W; Löllgen H; Kersting F
    Z Kardiol; 1978 Oct; 67(10):707-16. PubMed ID: 366940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experiences with different computerprograms for the ECG-analysis.
    Meyer J; Heinrich KW; Merx W; Effert S
    G Ital Cardiol; 1975; 5(2):279-87. PubMed ID: 1102376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer interpretation of electrocardiograms and vectorcardiograms.
    Enderle J; Telerman M; Pordy L; Chesky K; Jaffe H
    Adv Cardiol; 1976; 16():194-202. PubMed ID: 775912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of emergency department interpretation of electrocardiograms.
    Snoey ER; Housset B; Guyon P; ElHaddad S; Valty J; Hericord P
    J Accid Emerg Med; 1994 Sep; 11(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 7804577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety of Computer Interpretation of Normal Triage Electrocardiograms.
    Hughes KE; Lewis SM; Katz L; Jones J
    Acad Emerg Med; 2017 Jan; 24(1):120-124. PubMed ID: 27519772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of erroneous computer interpretation of ECGs on resident decision making.
    Southern WN; Arnsten JH
    Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(3):372-6. PubMed ID: 19470722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [A comparative investigation of the clinical value of an ECG-computer analysis (author's transl)].
    Enenkel W; Spiel R; Kiss E
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1974 Oct; 86(18):523-7. PubMed ID: 4277767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Emergency department interpretation of electrocardiograms.
    Westdrop EJ; Gratton MC; Watson WA
    Ann Emerg Med; 1992 May; 21(5):541-4. PubMed ID: 1570910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improvement of automated electrocardiographic diagnosis by combination of computer interpretations of the electrocardiogram and vectorcardiogram.
    Kors JA; van Herpen G; Willems JL; van Bemmel JH
    Am J Cardiol; 1992 Jul; 70(1):96-9. PubMed ID: 1615877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality assurance in the emergency department: evaluation of the ECG review process.
    Kuhn M; Morgan MT; Hoffman JR
    Ann Emerg Med; 1992 Jan; 21(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 1539876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of electrocardiogram interpretations by family physicians, a computer, and a cardiology service.
    Woolley D; Henck M; Luck J
    J Fam Pract; 1992 Apr; 34(4):428-32. PubMed ID: 1556536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Employment of intra-individual variability to improve computerized ECG interpretation.
    Schijvenaars BJ; Kors JA; van Herpen G; van Bemmel JH
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 1):513-7. PubMed ID: 11604793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of ECG interpretation in competitive athletes: the impact of using standised ECG criteria.
    Drezner JA; Asif IM; Owens DS; Prutkin JM; Salerno JC; Fean R; Rao AL; Stout K; Harmon KG
    Br J Sports Med; 2012 Apr; 46(5):335-40. PubMed ID: 22310648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.