These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3902333)

  • 21. Automatic multilabel electrocardiogram diagnosis of heart rhythm or conduction abnormalities with deep learning: a cohort study.
    Zhu H; Cheng C; Yin H; Li X; Zuo P; Ding J; Lin F; Wang J; Zhou B; Li Y; Hu S; Xiong Y; Wang B; Wan G; Yang X; Yuan Y
    Lancet Digit Health; 2020 Jul; 2(7):e348-e357. PubMed ID: 33328094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Evaluation of electrocardiogram's interpretation in the emergency department].
    Bouida W; Dridi Z; Nouira S; Gamra H; Ben Frahat M
    Tunis Med; 2004 Apr; 82(4):358-62. PubMed ID: 15453031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical usefulness of computer diagnosis in automated electrocardiography.
    Endou K; Miyahara H; Sato T
    Cardiology; 1980; 66(3):174-89. PubMed ID: 6996814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Letter: Evaluating computer ECG programs.
    Pipberger HV; Cornfield J
    Circulation; 1974 Dec; 50(6):1287-8. PubMed ID: 4279148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Emergency physician accuracy in interpreting electrocardiograms with potential ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Is it enough?
    Veronese G; Germini F; Ingrassia S; Cutuli O; Donati V; Bonacchini L; Marcucci M; Fabbri A;
    Acute Card Care; 2016 Mar; 18(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 27759433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Do Medical Practitioners Trust Automated Interpretation of Electrocardiograms?
    Delrot C; Bouzillé G; Calafiore M; Rochoy M; Legrand B; Ficheur G; Chazard E
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2019 Aug; 264():536-540. PubMed ID: 31437981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Limitations of the computer in electrocardiographic interpretation.
    Caceres CA
    Am J Cardiol; 1976 Sep; 38(3):362-76. PubMed ID: 785997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of computerized electrocardiographic interpretations in a community hospital.
    Pryor WW; Blackhurst DW; Gates K; Wagner GS
    J S C Med Assoc; 1995 Mar; 91(3):105-11. PubMed ID: 7739204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Visual or computer-based measurements: important for interpretation of athletes' ECG.
    Berge HM; Steine K; Andersen TE; Solberg EE; Gjesdal K
    Br J Sports Med; 2014 May; 48(9):761-7. PubMed ID: 24563390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Comparison of Physician to Computer Interpreted Electrocardiograms on ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction Door-to-balloon Times.
    Mawri S; Michaels A; Gibbs J; Shah S; Rao S; Kugelmass A; Lingam N; Arida M; Jacobsen G; Rowlandson I; Iyer K; Khandelwal A; McCord J
    Crit Pathw Cardiol; 2016 Mar; 15(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 26881816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Diagnostic accuracy of a 15-lead hybrid computer-aided electrocardiographic system.
    Talbot S; Dreifus LS; Watanabe Y; Reich M; Chiang R; Morris K
    Eur J Cardiol; 1973 Sep; 1(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 4618198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The impact of the computer-reported vectorcardiogram on the cardiologist interpreter of the scalar electrocardiogram.
    Milliken JA; Burggraf GW; McCans JL
    J Electrocardiol; 1977; 10(4):375-8. PubMed ID: 144173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Electrocardiogram interpretation in general practice.
    Jensen MS; Thomsen JL; Jensen SE; Lauritzen T; Engberg M
    Fam Pract; 2005 Feb; 22(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 15528292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Do computer generated ECG reports improve interpretation by accident and emergency senior house officers?
    Goodacre S; Webster A; Morris F
    Postgrad Med J; 2001 Jul; 77(909):455-7. PubMed ID: 11423597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prevalence and clinical implications of improper filter settings in routine electrocardiography.
    Kligfield P; Okin PM
    Am J Cardiol; 2007 Mar; 99(5):711-3. PubMed ID: 17317378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracy of electrocardiogram interpretation by cardiologists in the setting of incorrect computer analysis.
    Anh D; Krishnan S; Bogun F
    J Electrocardiol; 2006 Jul; 39(3):343-5. PubMed ID: 16777525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Performance of the computer and physician in the analysis of the electrocardiogram.
    Caceres CA; Hochberg HM
    Am Heart J; 1970 Apr; 79(4):439-43. PubMed ID: 4907228
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A prospective evaluation of the utility of the prehospital 12-lead electrocardiogram to change patient management in the emergency department.
    Davis M; Lewell M; McLeod S; Dukelow A
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2014; 18(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 24028608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinicians, the Mount Sinai program and the Veterans' Administration program evaluated against clinico-pathological data derived independently of the electrocardiogram.
    Bourdillon PJ; Kilpatrick D
    Eur J Cardiol; 1978 Nov; 8(4-5):395-412. PubMed ID: 152709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of the efficacy of hand-held computer screens for cardiologists' interpretations of 12-lead electrocardiograms.
    Pettis KS; Savona MR; Leibrandt PN; Maynard C; Lawson WT; Gates KB; Wagner GS
    Am Heart J; 1999 Oct; 138(4 Pt 1):765-70. PubMed ID: 10502225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.