These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Detection and quantitation of coronary artery stenoses from digital subtraction angiograms compared with 35-millimeter film cineangiograms. Tobis J; Nalcioglu O; Iseri L; Johnston WD; Roeck W; Castleman E; Bauer B; Montelli S; Henry WL Am J Cardiol; 1984 Sep; 54(6):489-96. PubMed ID: 6383001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital subtraction coronary angiography using high-pass temporal filtration: a comparison with cineangiography. Bray BE; Anderson FL; Hardin CW; Kruger RA; Sutton RB; Nelson JA Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1985; 11(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 3884167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparisons of images simultaneously documented by digital subtraction coronary arteriography and cine coronary arteriography]. Kimura K; Takamiya M; Yamamoto K; Ohta M; Naito H J Cardiol; 1988 Dec; 18(4):889-97. PubMed ID: 3267727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison of quantitative coronary arteriography using cinefilm and digital images]. Arai H; Sato H; Aizawa T; Watanabe H J Cardiol; 2001 May; 37(5):241-8. PubMed ID: 11392892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital subtraction angiographic assessment of the coronary arteries and coronary flow reserve. Vogel RA; Mancini GB; Bates ER Int J Card Imaging; 1985; 1(4):225-32. PubMed ID: 3916437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Model-driven visualization of coronary arteries. Herman GT; Axel L; Bajcsy R; Kundel H; LeVeen R; Udupa JK; Wolf G Radiat Med; 1983; 1(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 6679903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of digital and cine coronary arteriography. Gurley JC; Nissen SE Int J Card Imaging; 1990; 5(2-3):105-18. PubMed ID: 2230289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]