These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39023672)

  • 1. Robotic-Assisted and Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgeries Still Have Clinically Comparable Outcomes.
    Cashman CL; Shah SV; Hall AG; Walters RW; Nandipati KC
    Obes Surg; 2024 Aug; 34(8):2954-2964. PubMed ID: 39023672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a propensity score-matched comparative analysis using the 2015-2016 MBSAQIP database.
    Sebastian R; Howell MH; Chang KH; Adrales G; Magnuson T; Schweitzer M; Nguyen H
    Surg Endosc; 2019 May; 33(5):1600-1612. PubMed ID: 30225604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Operative Time and 30-Day Outcomes in Bariatric Surgery: Comparison between Robotic and Laparoscopic Approach: 4-Year MBSAQIP Database Analysis.
    Ho K; Hsu CH; Maegawa F; Ashouri Y; Ho H; Ajmal S; Ghaderi I
    J Am Coll Surg; 2022 Jul; 235(1):138-144. PubMed ID: 35703971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative early outcomes of three laparoscopic bariatric procedures: sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch.
    Topart P; Becouarn G; Ritz P
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2012; 8(3):250-4. PubMed ID: 21803660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is Robotic Revisional Bariatric Surgery Justified? An MBSAQIP Analysis.
    Seton T; Mahan M; Dove J; Villanueva H; Obradovic V; Falvo A; Horsley R; Petrick A; Parker DM
    Obes Surg; 2022 Dec; 32(12):3863-3868. PubMed ID: 36264443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic approach to concurrent bariatric surgery and hiatal hernia repair: propensity score matching analysis using the 2015-2018 MBSAQIP.
    Sebastian R; Ghanem OM; Cornejo J; Ruttger T; Mayuiers M; Adrales G; Li C
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Sep; 36(9):6886-6895. PubMed ID: 35020060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. First Assistant In Bariatric Surgery: A Comparison Between Laparoscopic And Robotic Approaches: A 4-Year Analysis of the MBSAQIP Database (2016-2019).
    Rahimi AO; Hsu CH; Maegawa F; Soliman D; King RJ; Ashouri Y; Ghaderi I
    Obes Surg; 2024 Mar; 34(3):866-873. PubMed ID: 38114775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic revisional bariatric surgery: perioperative outcomes from the MBSAQIP database.
    Nasser H; Munie S; Kindel TL; Gould JC; Higgins RM
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2020 Mar; 16(3):397-405. PubMed ID: 31932204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laparoscopic conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to a biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch or a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass due to weight loss failure: our algorithm.
    Carmeli I; Golomb I; Sadot E; Kashtan H; Keidar A
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2015; 11(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 25304833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcomes in conventional laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted revisional bariatric surgery: a retrospective, case-controlled study of the MBSAQIP database.
    Acevedo E; Mazzei M; Zhao H; Lu X; Edwards MA
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Apr; 34(4):1573-1584. PubMed ID: 31209611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Longitudinal Efficiency of Robotic Surgery: an MBSAQIP Propensity Matched 4-Year Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery.
    Dudash M; Kuhn J; Dove J; Fluck M; Horsley R; Gabrielsen J; Daouadi M; Petrick AT; Parker DM
    Obes Surg; 2020 Oct; 30(10):3706-3713. PubMed ID: 32495073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perioperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Robotic Revisional Bariatric Surgery in a Complex Patient Population.
    Gray KD; Moore MD; Elmously A; Bellorin O; Zarnegar R; Dakin G; Pomp A; Afaneh C
    Obes Surg; 2018 Jul; 28(7):1852-1859. PubMed ID: 29417487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Thirty-day outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: first report based on Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database.
    Chaar ME; Lundberg P; Stoltzfus J
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2018 May; 14(5):545-551. PubMed ID: 29551470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trends in the utilization and perioperative outcomes of primary robotic bariatric surgery from 2015 to 2018: a study of 46,764 patients from the MBSAQIP data registry.
    Tatarian T; Yang J; Wang J; Docimo S; Talamini M; Pryor AD; Spaniolas K
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Jul; 35(7):3915-3922. PubMed ID: 32737605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trends in Utilization and Perioperative Outcomes in Robotic-assisted Bariatric surgery using the MBSAQIP database: A 4-Year Analysis.
    Scarritt T; Hsu CH; Maegawa FB; Ayala AE; Mobily M; Ghaderi I
    Obes Surg; 2021 Feb; 31(2):854-861. PubMed ID: 33165753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robotic Bariatric Surgery in Older Adults, Is It Safer Than the Laparoscopic Approach? A 7-Year Analysis of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) Database.
    Rahimi AO; Ashouri Y; Maegawa F; Hsu CH; Ghaderi I
    Obes Surg; 2023 Sep; 33(9):2671-2678. PubMed ID: 37434018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcomes in racial minorities after robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a retrospective review of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database.
    Acevedo E; Lu X; Zhao H; Mazzei M; Sarvepalli S; Edwards MA
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2021 Mar; 17(3):595-605. PubMed ID: 33257274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of early post-operative complications in primary and revisional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, gastric bypass, and duodenal switch MBSAQIP-reported cases from 2015 to 2019.
    Bennett WC; Garbarine IC; Mostellar M; Lipman J; Sanchez-Casalongue M; Farrell T; Zhou R
    Surg Endosc; 2023 May; 37(5):3728-3738. PubMed ID: 36653536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Bariatric Surgery Compared to Standard Laparoscopic Approach Using a Standardized Definition: First Look at the 2020 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation Quality Improvement Project (MBSAQIP) Data.
    El Chaar M; Petrick A; Clapp B; Stoltzfus J; Alvarado LA
    Obes Surg; 2023 Jul; 33(7):2025-2039. PubMed ID: 37184827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Increased staple line leak rates following re-sleeve: analysis comparing re-sleeve versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass conversion and primary sleeve gastrectomy.
    Cornejo J; Zevallos A; Sarmiento J; Shojaeian F; Mokhtari-Esbuie F; Adrales G; Li C; Sebastian R
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Sep; 38(9):5368-5376. PubMed ID: 39037465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.