These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39023858)
1. In Vitro Comparison of Titanium Disc Surface Roughness and Bacterial Colonization After Ultrasonic Instrumentation With Three Different Tips. Kitaygorodskiy A; Gregory RL; Lim G; Hamada Y J Oral Implantol; 2024 Oct; 50(5):537-543. PubMed ID: 39023858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of piezoelectric ultrasonic instrumentation on titanium discs: a microscopy and trace elemental analysis in vitro study. Tawse-Smith A; Atieh MA; Tompkins G; Duncan WJ; Reid MR; Stirling CH Int J Dent Hyg; 2016 Aug; 14(3):191-201. PubMed ID: 26094557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of ultrasonic scaler tips and toothbrush on titanium disc surfaces evaluated with confocal microscopy. Park JB; Kim N; Ko Y J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 23(5):1552-8. PubMed ID: 22976659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biofilm formation on polyetheretherketone and titanium surfaces. Barkarmo S; Longhorn D; Leer K; Johansson CB; Stenport V; Franco-Tabares S; Kuehne SA; Sammons R Clin Exp Dent Res; 2019 Aug; 5(4):427-437. PubMed ID: 31452954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Material characterization and Streptococcus oralis adhesion on Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and titanium surfaces used in implantology. D'Ercole S; Cellini L; Pilato S; Di Lodovico S; Iezzi G; Piattelli A; Petrini M J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2020 Sep; 31(10):84. PubMed ID: 32989624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment with various ultrasonic scaler tips affects efficiency of brushing of SLA titanium discs. Park JB; Jang YJ; Choi BK; Kim KK; Ko Y J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 24(2):e119-23. PubMed ID: 23524804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of implant surface and instrument insert changes due to instrumentation with different tips for ultrasonic-driven debridement. Sahrmann P; Winkler S; Gubler A; Attin T BMC Oral Health; 2021 Jan; 21(1):25. PubMed ID: 33413296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In Vivo Biofilm Formation on Novel PEEK, Titanium, and Zirconia Implant Abutment Materials. Wiessner A; Wassmann T; Wiessner JM; Schubert A; Wiechens B; Hampe T; Bürgers R Int J Mol Sci; 2023 Jan; 24(2):. PubMed ID: 36675292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of bacterial adhesion on machined titanium, Osseotite® and Nanotite® discs. Rodriguez y Baena R; Arciola CR; Selan L; Battaglia R; Imbriani M; Rizzo S; Visai L Int J Artif Organs; 2012 Oct; 35(10):754-61. PubMed ID: 23065893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-species biofilm model onto plasma-treated titanium implant surface. Matos AO; Ricomini-Filho AP; Beline T; Ogawa ES; Costa-Oliveira BE; de Almeida AB; Nociti Junior FH; Rangel EC; da Cruz NC; Sukotjo C; Mathew MT; Barão VAR Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2017 Apr; 152():354-366. PubMed ID: 28131960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles coating of titanium surface on biofilm adhesion: An in vitro study. Reis-Neta GRD; Ricomini-Filho AP; Martorano-Fernandes L; Vargas-Moreno VF; Cury AADB; Marcello-Machado RM Arch Oral Biol; 2024 Aug; 164():105986. PubMed ID: 38723421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surface roughness associated with bacterial adhesion on dental resin-based materials. Bunz O; Diekamp M; Bizhang M; Testrich H; Piwowarczyk A Dent Mater J; 2024 Sep; 43(5):621-628. PubMed ID: 39218688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bacterial adhesion on smooth and rough titanium surfaces after treatment with different instruments. Duarte PM; Reis AF; de Freitas PM; Ota-Tsuzuki C J Periodontol; 2009 Nov; 80(11):1824-32. PubMed ID: 19905952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro comparison of root surface roughness and bacterial adhesion following treatment with three different instruments. Haroon F; Gregory RL; Hara A; Blanchard SB; Hamada Y J Periodontol; 2022 May; 93(5):e83-e91. PubMed ID: 34338309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The maintenance of inserted titanium implants: in-vitro evaluation of exposed surfaces cleaned with three different instruments. Bertoldi C; Lusuardi D; Battarra F; Sassatelli P; Spinato S; Zaffe D Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Jan; 28(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 26744027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro study of surface alterations to polyetheretherketone and titanium and their effect upon human gingival fibroblasts. Gheisarifar M; Thompson GA; Drago C; Tabatabaei F; Rasoulianboroujeni M J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):155-164. PubMed ID: 32081352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Instrumentation With Ultrasonic Scalers Facilitates Cleaning of the Sandblasted and Acid-Etched Titanium Implants. Park JB; Lee SH; Kim N; Park S; Jin SH; Choi BK; Kim KK; Ko Y J Oral Implantol; 2015 Aug; 41(4):419-28. PubMed ID: 24552131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative evaluation of roughness of titanium surfaces treated by different hygiene instruments. Unursaikhan O; Lee JS; Cha JK; Park JC; Jung UW; Kim CS; Cho KS; Choi SH J Periodontal Implant Sci; 2012 Jun; 42(3):88-94. PubMed ID: 22803010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Bacterial Anti-Adhesive Activity of Double-Etched Titanium (DAE) as a Dental Implant Surface. Petrini M; Giuliani A; Di Campli E; Di Lodovico S; Iezzi G; Piattelli A; D'Ercole S Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Nov; 21(21):. PubMed ID: 33167597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]