These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39024736)

  • 1. An OpenSim thoracolumbar spine model applying a bottom-up modelling approach is similar to a top-down approach.
    Banks JJ; Wiggermann NE; Allaire BT; Anderson DE
    J Biomech; 2024 Jul; 172():112230. PubMed ID: 39024736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An Enhanced Spine Model Validated for Simulating Dynamic Lifting Tasks in OpenSim.
    Akhavanfar M; Mir-Orefice A; Uchida TK; Graham RB
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2024 Feb; 52(2):259-269. PubMed ID: 37741902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Thoracolumbar spine model with articulated ribcage for the prediction of dynamic spinal loading.
    Ignasiak D; Dendorfer S; Ferguson SJ
    J Biomech; 2016 Apr; 49(6):959-966. PubMed ID: 26684431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of a wearable system for 3D ambulatory L5/S1 moment assessment during manual lifting using instrumented shoes and an inertial sensor suit.
    Faber GS; Kingma I; Chang CC; Dennerlein JT; van Dieën JH
    J Biomech; 2020 Mar; 102():109671. PubMed ID: 32143885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intervertebral reaction force prediction using an enhanced assembly of OpenSim models.
    Senteler M; Weisse B; Rothenfluh DA; Snedeker JG
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2016; 19(5):538-48. PubMed ID: 26031341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prediction of biomechanical parameters in the lumbar spine during static sagittal plane lifting.
    Kong WZ; Goel VK; Gilbertson LG
    J Biomech Eng; 1998 Apr; 120(2):273-80. PubMed ID: 10412390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using static postures to estimate spinal loading during dynamic lifts with participant-specific thoracolumbar musculoskeletal models.
    Banks JJ; Alemi MM; Allaire BT; Lynch AC; Bouxsein ML; Anderson DE
    Appl Ergon; 2023 Jan; 106():103869. PubMed ID: 36055036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimation of lumbar spinal loading and trunk muscle forces during asymmetric lifting tasks: application of whole-body musculoskeletal modelling in OpenSim.
    Kim HK; Zhang Y
    Ergonomics; 2017 Apr; 60(4):563-576. PubMed ID: 27194401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative ability of EMG, optimization, and hybrid modelling approaches to predict trunk muscle forces and lumbar spine loading during dynamic sagittal plane lifting.
    Gagnon D; Larivière C; Loisel P
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2001 Jun; 16(5):359-72. PubMed ID: 11390042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of an OpenSim full-body model with detailed lumbar spine for estimating lower lumbar spine loads during symmetric and asymmetric lifting tasks.
    Beaucage-Gauvreau E; Robertson WSP; Brandon SCE; Fraser R; Freeman BJC; Graham RB; Thewlis D; Jones CF
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2019 Apr; 22(5):451-464. PubMed ID: 30714401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An investigation of jogging biomechanics using the full-body lumbar spine model: Model development and validation.
    Raabe ME; Chaudhari AMW
    J Biomech; 2016 May; 49(7):1238-1243. PubMed ID: 26947033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A braced arm-to-thigh (BATT) lifting technique reduces lumbar spine loads in healthy and low back pain participants.
    Beaucage-Gauvreau E; Brandon SCE; Robertson WSP; Fraser R; Freeman BJC; Graham RB; Thewlis D; Jones CF
    J Biomech; 2020 Feb; 100():109584. PubMed ID: 31898975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A musculoskeletal model for the lumbar spine.
    Christophy M; Faruk Senan NA; Lotz JC; O'Reilly OM
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2012 Jan; 11(1-2):19-34. PubMed ID: 21318374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of squat and stoop dynamic liftings: muscle forces and internal spinal loads.
    Bazrgari B; Shirazi-Adl A; Arjmand N
    Eur Spine J; 2007 May; 16(5):687-99. PubMed ID: 17103232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative analysis of lumbar spine mechanics during barbell- and crate-lifting: implications for occupational lifting task assessments.
    Zehr JD; Carnegie DR; Welsh TN; Beach TAC
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2020 Mar; 26(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 29436289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hybrid musculoskeletal model-based 3D asymmetric lifting prediction and comparison with symmetric lifting.
    Xiang Y; Zaman R; Arefeen A; Quarnstrom J; Rakshit R; Yang J
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2023 Jun; 237(6):770-781. PubMed ID: 37139889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An EMG technique for measuring spinal loading during asymmetric lifting.
    Dolan P; Kingma I; De Looze MP; van Dieen JH; Toussaint HM; Baten CT; Adams MA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2001; 16 Suppl 1():S17-24. PubMed ID: 11275339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unilateral ankle immobilization alters the kinematics and kinetics of lifting.
    Beach TA; Frost DM; Clark JM; Maly MR; Callaghan JP
    Work; 2014; 47(2):221-34. PubMed ID: 23324721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Real-time lumbosacral joint loading estimation in exoskeleton-assisted lifting conditions via electromyography-driven musculoskeletal models.
    Moya-Esteban A; Durandau G; van der Kooij H; Sartori M
    J Biomech; 2023 Aug; 157():111727. PubMed ID: 37499430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Flexion-extension response of the thoracolumbar spine under compressive follower preload.
    Stanley SK; Ghanayem AJ; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Paxinos O; Carandang G; Zindrick MR; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Nov; 29(22):E510-4. PubMed ID: 15543052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.