These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39026079)
21. Clinical and radiologic comparison of dynamic cervical implant arthroplasty and cervical total disc replacement for single-level cervical degenerative disc disease. Shichang L; Yueming S; Limin L; Lei W; Zhongjie Z; Chunguang Z; Xi Y J Clin Neurosci; 2016 May; 27():102-9. PubMed ID: 26928156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Revision Surgery for a Failed Artificial Disc. Kim KR; Chin DK; Kim KS; Cho YE; Shin DA; Kim KN; Kuh SU Yonsei Med J; 2021 Mar; 62(3):240-248. PubMed ID: 33635014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Kinematics of cervical total disc replacement adjacent to a two-level, straight versus lordotic fusion. Martin S; Ghanayem AJ; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Renner SM; Carandang G; Abjornson C; Patwardhan AG Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Aug; 36(17):1359-66. PubMed ID: 21629170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cervical total disc replacement with the Mobi-C cervical artificial disc compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial: clinical article. Davis RJ; Kim KD; Hisey MS; Hoffman GA; Bae HW; Gaede SE; Rashbaum RF; Nunley PD; Peterson DL; Stokes JK J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Nov; 19(5):532-45. PubMed ID: 24010901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of Different Hybrid Techniques for the Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease-Analysis of Prospectively Collected Clinical, Radiologic, and Psychological Parameters. Brotzki C; Petridis AK; Steiger HJ; Bostelmann T; Bostelmann R World Neurosurg; 2020 Aug; 140():e112-e120. PubMed ID: 32371075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. ProDisc-C and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as surgical treatment for single-level cervical symptomatic degenerative disc disease: five-year results of a Food and Drug Administration study. Zigler JE; Delamarter R; Murrey D; Spivak J; Janssen M Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Feb; 38(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 23080427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical outcomes of two revision strategies for failed total disc replacements. Punt I; Willems P; Kurtz S; van Rhijn L; van Ooij A Eur Spine J; 2012 Dec; 21(12):2558-64. PubMed ID: 22576159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Total Disk Replacement Adjacent to a Multilevel Fusion in the Cervical Spine: A Biomechanical Motion Analysis. Segal DN; Grabel ZJ; Wilson JM; Milby AH; Shi WJ; Hutton WC; Rhee JM World Neurosurg; 2019 Feb; 122():e881-e889. PubMed ID: 30391767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Revision surgery for cervical artificial disc: Surgical technique and clinical results. Onken J; Reinke A; Radke J; Finger T; Bayerl S; Vajkoczy P; Meyer B Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2017 Jan; 152():39-44. PubMed ID: 27888676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Lumbar total disc replacement impingement sensitivity to disc height distraction, spinal sagittal orientation, implant position, and implant lordosis. Rundell SA; Day JS; Isaza J; Guillory S; Kurtz SM Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 May; 37(10):E590-8. PubMed ID: 22146286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Clinical Outcomes of Outpatient Cervical Total Disc Replacement Compared With Outpatient Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. Chin KR; Pencle FJR; Seale JA; Pencle FK Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 May; 42(10):E567-E574. PubMed ID: 27755491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cervical spine alignment in disc arthroplasty: should we change our perspective? Di Martino A; Papalia R; Albo E; Cortesi L; Denaro L; Denaro V Eur Spine J; 2015 Nov; 24 Suppl 7():810-25. PubMed ID: 26441258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Surgical technique for revision surgery of cervical artificial disc replacements. Onken J; Meyer B; Vajkoczy P Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Jan; 42(VideoSuppl1):V3. PubMed ID: 28042721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison between cervical total disc replacement and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion of 1 to 2 levels from 2002 to 2009. Nandyala SV; Marquez-Lara A; Fineberg SJ; Singh K Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jan; 39(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 24108292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Revision Surgery of Total Lumbar Disk Replacement: Review of 48 Cases. Schmitz A; Collinet A; Ntilikina Y; Tigan L; Charles YP; Steib JP Clin Spine Surg; 2021 Jul; 34(6):E315-E322. PubMed ID: 33797426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Kinematic evaluation of one- and two-level Maverick lumbar total disc replacement caudal to a long thoracolumbar spinal fusion. Zhu Q; Itshayek E; Jones CF; Schwab T; Larson CR; Lenke LG; Cripton PA Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S599-611. PubMed ID: 22531900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Segmental Motion of the Cervical Spine After Total Disc Replacement Using ActivC Versus Discectomy and Fusion Using Stand-alone Cage. Kim BJ; Kim SH; Lee SH; Ha SK; Kim SD; Lim DJ World Neurosurg; 2019 Jun; 126():e1228-e1234. PubMed ID: 30885861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Mid- to long-term results of total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective analysis with 5- to 10-year follow-up. Siepe CJ; Heider F; Wiechert K; Hitzl W; Ishak B; Mayer MH Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1417-31. PubMed ID: 24448028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]