These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39028693)

  • 1. Information structure in Makhuwa: Electrophysiological evidence for a universal processing account.
    Verdonschot RG; van der Wal J; Lewis A; Knudsen B; von Grebmer Zu Wolfsthurn S; Schiller NO; Hagoort P
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2024 Jul; 121(30):e2315438121. PubMed ID: 39028693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrophysiological correlates of cross-linguistic semantic integration in hearing signers: N400 and LPC.
    Zachau S; Korpilahti P; Hämäläinen JA; Ervast L; Heinänen K; Suominen K; Lehtihalmes M; Leppänen PH
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jul; 59():57-73. PubMed ID: 24751994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Melodic pitch expectation interacts with neural responses to syntactic but not semantic violations.
    Carrus E; Pearce MT; Bhattacharya J
    Cortex; 2013 Sep; 49(8):2186-200. PubMed ID: 23141867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Syntactic complexity and ambiguity resolution in a free word order language: behavioral and electrophysiological evidences from Basque.
    Erdocia K; Laka I; Mestres-Missé A; Rodriguez-Fornells A
    Brain Lang; 2009 Apr; 109(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 19223065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Age of acquisition effects differ across linguistic domains in sign language: EEG evidence.
    Malaia EA; Krebs J; Roehm D; Wilbur RB
    Brain Lang; 2020 Jan; 200():104708. PubMed ID: 31698097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of information structure on the depth of semantic processing: how focus and pitch accent determine the size of the N400 effect.
    Wang L; Bastiaansen M; Yang Y; Hagoort P
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Apr; 49(5):813-820. PubMed ID: 21195102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neurophysiological correlates of automatic integration of voice and gender information during grammatical processing.
    Alekseeva M; Myachykov A; Bermudez-Margaretto B; Shtyrov Y
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):13114. PubMed ID: 35908074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The bilingual brain turns a blind eye to negative statements in the second language.
    Jończyk R; Boutonnet B; Musiał K; Hoemann K; Thierry G
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Jun; 16(3):527-40. PubMed ID: 26926623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrophysiological measures of language processing in bilinguals.
    Proverbio AM; Cok B; Zani A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Oct; 14(7):994-1017. PubMed ID: 12419124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrophysiological estimates of biological and syntactic gender violation during pronoun processing.
    Schmitt BM; Lamers M; Münte TF
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2002 Nov; 14(3):333-46. PubMed ID: 12421657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Event-related brain potentials reflect semantic and syntactic errors during language processing].
    Münte TF; Heinze HJ; Prevedel H
    EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb; 1990 Jun; 21(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 2113458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cross-linguistic variation in the neurophysiological response to semantic processing: evidence from anomalies at the borderline of awareness.
    Tune S; Schlesewsky M; Small SL; Sanford AJ; Bohan J; Sassenhagen J; Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Apr; 56():147-66. PubMed ID: 24447768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural signatures of syntactic variation in speech planning.
    Sauppe S; Choudhary KK; Giroud N; Blasi DE; Norcliffe E; Bhattamishra S; Gulati M; Egurtzegi A; Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I; Meyer M; Bickel B
    PLoS Biol; 2021 Jan; 19(1):e3001038. PubMed ID: 33497384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Subject preference emerges as cross-modal strategy for linguistic processing.
    Krebs J; Malaia E; Wilbur RB; Roehm D
    Brain Res; 2018 Jul; 1691():105-117. PubMed ID: 29627484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Confusing similar words: ERP correlates of lexical-semantic processing in first language attrition and late second language acquisition.
    Kasparian K; Steinhauer K
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Dec; 93(Pt A):200-217. PubMed ID: 27751710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Semantic illusion depends on information structure: ERP evidence.
    Wang L; Hagoort P; Yang Y
    Brain Res; 2009 Jul; 1282():50-6. PubMed ID: 19501067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Syntactic and semantic processing of passive BEI sentences in Mandarin Chinese: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Zeng T; Li Y; Wu M
    Neuroreport; 2020 Sep; 31(13):979-984. PubMed ID: 32694312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of animacy and thematic relationships in processing active English sentences: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Kuperberg GR; Kreher DA; Sitnikova T; Caplan DN; Holcomb PJ
    Brain Lang; 2007 Mar; 100(3):223-37. PubMed ID: 16546247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Syntactic and referential processes in second-language learners: event-related brain potential evidence.
    Isel F
    Neuroreport; 2007 Dec; 18(18):1885-9. PubMed ID: 18007180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of prominence in Spanish sentence comprehension: An ERP study.
    Gattei CA; Tabullo Á; París L; Wainselboim AJ
    Brain Lang; 2015 Nov; 150():22-35. PubMed ID: 26291770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.