BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3902899)

  • 21. Clinical and laboratory considerations of culture vs antigen assays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis from genital specimens.
    Kellogg JA
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1989 May; 113(5):453-60. PubMed ID: 2653270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of chlamydiazyme for the detection of genital infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Howard LV; Coleman PF; England BJ; Herrmann JE
    J Clin Microbiol; 1986 Feb; 23(2):329-32. PubMed ID: 3517052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Chlamydial infections of the urethra in women.
    Bradley MG; Hobson D; Lee N; Tait IA; Rees E
    Genitourin Med; 1985 Dec; 61(6):371-5. PubMed ID: 4086029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Comparative evaluation of various direct and culture methods for the diagnosis of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections].
    Martelli P; Crovatto M; Gava G; Chiaradia V; Santini G
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1986 Mar; 22(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 3538126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Confirmatory testing demonstrates that false-positive rates in the chlamydiazyme assay are influenced by gender and genital specimen type.
    Chernesky M; Jang D; Sellors J; Castriciano S; Pickard L; Luinstra K; Mahony J
    Sex Transm Dis; 1993; 20(6):301-6. PubMed ID: 8108751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of enzyme immunoassay for the detection of anogenital infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Tay YK; Goh CL; Chan R; Ali K; Nadarajah M; Sng J
    Singapore Med J; 1995 Apr; 36(2):173-5. PubMed ID: 7676262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of two enzyme immunoassays and an immunofluorescence test for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Grillner L; Beckman S; Hammar H
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1986 Oct; 5(5):559-62. PubMed ID: 3536502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Enzyme immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis from the cervix.
    Amortegui AJ; Meyer MP
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Apr; 65(4):523-6. PubMed ID: 3885103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Altering TestPack Chlamydia sampling swab decreases testing time.
    Coleman P
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1991; 14(2):171-2. PubMed ID: 1831415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assays in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis: how valid are they?
    Weismeier E; Bruckner DA; Malotte CK; Manduke L
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1988 Apr; 9(4):219-23. PubMed ID: 3180707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of the Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay and Gen-Probe PACE 2 with cell culture for diagnosis of cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a high-prevalence female population.
    Clarke LM; Sierra MF; Daidone BJ; Lopez N; Covino JM; McCormack WM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Apr; 31(4):968-71. PubMed ID: 7681852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of the Syva Microtrak enzyme immunoassay and Abbott Chlamydiazyme in the detection of chlamydial infections in women.
    Olsen MA; Sambol AR; Bohnert VA
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1995 Feb; 119(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 7848062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Development of EIA for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital specimens.
    Chomvarin C; Chantarasuk Y; Thongkrajai P; Yutanawiboonchai W; Waropastrakul N
    Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2000 Mar; 31(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 11023074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of the effectiveness of polymerase chain reaction and enzyme immunoassay in detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in different female genitourinary specimens.
    Chan EL; Brandt K; Stoneham H; Antonishyn N; Horsman GB
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2000 Jun; 124(6):840-3. PubMed ID: 10835517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prevalence of isolated urethral asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the absence of cervical infection in incarcerated adolescent girls.
    Morris RE; Legault J; Baker C
    Sex Transm Dis; 1993; 20(4):198-200. PubMed ID: 8211536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Chlamydia trachomatis in women: the more you look, the more you find.
    Hay PE; Thomas BJ; Horner PJ; MacLeod E; Renton AM; Taylor-Robinson D
    Genitourin Med; 1994 Apr; 70(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 8206484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Deoxyribonucleic acid hybridization analysis for the detection of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women.
    Pao CC; Lin SS; Yang TE; Soong YK; Lee PS; Lin JY
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Jan; 156(1):195-9. PubMed ID: 3541618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of chlamydiazyme enzyme immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from men.
    Ehret JM; Leszcynski JC; Douglas JM; Genova SL; Chernesky MA; Moncada J; Schachter J
    J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Oct; 31(10):2702-5. PubMed ID: 8253969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Diagnostic value of rapid detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by using amplified enzyme immunoassay in infants with respiratory infections.
    Numazaki K; Chiba S
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1993 Oct; 17(3):233-4. PubMed ID: 8112033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Rapid detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by an enzyme immunoassay method.
    Ryan RW; Kwasnik I; Steingrimsson O; Gudmundsson J; Thorarinsson H; Tilton RC
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1986 Sep; 5(3):225-34. PubMed ID: 3530626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.