These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39029505)

  • 1. Auditory nerve fiber excitability for alternative electrode placement in the obstructed human cochlea: electrode insertion in scala vestibuli versus scala tympani.
    Fellner A; Wenger C; Heshmat A; Rattay F
    J Neural Eng; 2024 Aug; 21(4):. PubMed ID: 39029505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory outcomes after scala vestibuli array insertion are similar to those after scala tympani insertion 1 year after cochlear implantation.
    Gu W; Daoudi H; Lahlou G; Sterkers O; Ferrary E; Nguyen Y; Mosnier I; Torres R
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jan; 281(1):155-162. PubMed ID: 37516989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scala vestibuli cochlear implant supported by 3D modeling of the inner ear.
    Holzmeister C; Andrianakis A; Kiss P; Moser U; Graupp M
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2022 Mar; 134(5-6):243-248. PubMed ID: 34477971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative Impacts of Scala Vestibuli Versus Scala Tympani Cochlear Implantation on Auditory Performances and Programming Parameters in Partially Ossified Cochleae.
    Trudel M; Côté M; Philippon D; Simonyan D; Villemure-Poliquin N; Bussières R
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Jul; 39(6):700-706. PubMed ID: 29702527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scala vestibuli insertion in cochlear implantation: a valuable alternative for cases with obstructed scala tympani.
    Kiefer J; Weber A; Pfennigdorff T; von Ilberg C
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2000; 62(5):251-6. PubMed ID: 10965260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrical impedance measurements of cochlear structures using the four-electrode reflection-coefficient technique.
    Kumar G; Chokshi M; Richter CP
    Hear Res; 2010 Jan; 259(1-2):86-94. PubMed ID: 19857561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exploring Trauma Patterns and Contributing Factors With Slim Straight Electrode Array After Cochlear Implantation.
    Torres R; Daoudi H; Gu W; Breil E; Ferrary E; Sterkers O; Nguyen Y; Mosnier I
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2024 Aug; 171(2):521-529. PubMed ID: 38532540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The scala vestibuli for cochlear implantation. An anatomic study.
    Gulya AJ; Steenerson RL
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1996 Feb; 122(2):130-2. PubMed ID: 8630205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of cochlear morphology on the final electrode array position.
    Ketterer MC; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Hassepass F; Wesarg T; Laszig R; Beck R
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Feb; 275(2):385-394. PubMed ID: 29242990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The consequences of neural degeneration regarding optimal cochlear implant position in scala tympani: a model approach.
    Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 214(1-2):17-27. PubMed ID: 16520009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
    Xu J; Shepherd RK; Millard RE; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory prosthesis with a penetrating nerve array.
    Middlebrooks JC; Snyder RL
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Jun; 8(2):258-79. PubMed ID: 17265124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An overview of cochlear implant electrode array designs.
    Dhanasingh A; Jolly C
    Hear Res; 2017 Dec; 356():93-103. PubMed ID: 29102129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multichannel cochlear implantation in the scala vestibuli.
    Lin K; Marrinan MS; Waltzman SB; Roland JT
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):634-8. PubMed ID: 16788421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation After Cochlear Implant Surgery : Correlation of Clinical Outcome and Imaging Findings using Flat-detector CT.
    Stock A; Bozzato V; Kloska SP; Bozzato A; Hoppe U; Hornung J; Dörfler A; Struffert T
    Clin Neuroradiol; 2021 Jun; 31(2):367-372. PubMed ID: 32556392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of electrode design and surgical approach on scalar location and cochlear implant outcomes.
    Wanna GB; Noble JH; Carlson ML; Gifford RH; Dietrich MS; Haynes DS; Dawant BM; Labadie RF
    Laryngoscope; 2014 Nov; 124 Suppl 6(0 6):S1-7. PubMed ID: 24764083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Midmodiolar reconstruction as a valuable tool to determine the exact position of the cochlear implant electrode array.
    Lecerf P; Bakhos D; Cottier JP; Lescanne E; Trijolet JP; Robier A
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Sep; 32(7):1075-81. PubMed ID: 21817940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intracochlear Electrocochleography: Influence of Scalar Position of the Cochlear Implant Electrode on Postinsertion Results.
    Riggs WJ; Dwyer RT; Holder JT; Mattingly JK; Ortmann A; Noble JH; Dawant BM; Valenzuela CV; O'Connell BP; Harris MS; Litvak LM; Koka K; Buchman CA; Labadie RF; Adunka OF
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jun; 40(5):e503-e510. PubMed ID: 31083085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of insertion quality of a slim perimodiolar electrode array.
    Beck R; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Hildenbrand T; Rauch AK; Ketterer MC
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Mar; 281(3):1215-1220. PubMed ID: 37773530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spiral ganglion cell site of excitation I: comparison of scala tympani and intrameatal electrode responses.
    Cartee LA; Miller CA; van den Honert C
    Hear Res; 2006 May; 215(1-2):10-21. PubMed ID: 16624511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.