These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39029968)
1. Effect of Implant-Abutment Connection and Abutment Angulations on Peri-implant Stress Levels: A Finite Element Analysis Study. Khatib I; Joshi NV; Rao P; Joshi M; Shetty A; Thorat V; Talreja P Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2024; 45(7):e5-e9. PubMed ID: 39029968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stress distribution with extra-short implants in an angled frictional system: A finite element analysis study. de Souza Rendohl E; Brandt WC J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):728.e1-728.e9. PubMed ID: 32694020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigation of the Type of Angled Abutment for Anterior Maxillary Implants: A Finite Element Analysis. Korkmaz IH; Kul E J Prosthodont; 2022 Oct; 31(8):689-696. PubMed ID: 34859942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional Finite Element Stress Pattern Analysis in Bone around Implant-supported Abutment with Different Angulations under Axial and Oblique Load. Uppalapati V; Kumar S; Aggarwal R; Bhat I; Munaganti J; Khan S J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Jan; 24(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 37189007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of abutment angulation on the strain on the bone around an implant in the anterior maxilla: a finite element study. Saab XE; Griggs JA; Powers JM; Engelmeier RL J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Feb; 97(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 17341376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of Stress Distribution Among Two Different Pre-angled Abutments of Implants in Two Different Densities of Bone at Different Levels Along the Implant-/n Vitro Study. Singh NK; Chalapathy SB; Thota RP; Chakravarthula K; Tirnati R; Yenugupalli K J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1370-1375. PubMed ID: 30602643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of Connection Types and Implant Number on the Biomechanical Behavior of Mandibular Full-Arch Rehabilitation. Sousa RM; Simamoto-Junior PC; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Sloten JV; Jaecques SV; Pessoa RS Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):750-60. PubMed ID: 27447140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of the implant design on peri-implant bone stress and abutment micromovement: three-dimensional finite element analysis of original computer-aided design models. Yamanishi Y; Yamaguchi S; Imazato S; Nakano T; Yatani H J Periodontol; 2014 Sep; 85(9):e333-8. PubMed ID: 24835549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of the prosthetic index on stress distribution in Morse taper connection implant system and peri-implant bone: a 3D finite element analysis. Zhang WT; Cheng KJ; Liu YF; Wang R; Chen YF; Ding YD; Yang F; Wang LH BMC Oral Health; 2022 Sep; 22(1):431. PubMed ID: 36180871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mechanical Resistance of a 2.9-mm-Diameter Dental Implant With a Morse-Taper Implant-Abutment Connection. Alberti A; Corbella S; Francetti L J Oral Implantol; 2023 Jun; 49(3):323-329. PubMed ID: 36796063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Regular and platform switching: bone stress analysis varying implant type. Gurgel-Juarez NC; de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Freitas AC; Anchieta RB; de Vargas LC; Kina S; França FM J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 22372756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of Implant-Abutment Connection Type on Stress Distribution in Peri-Implant Bone and Abutment Micromovement: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis. Torkzaban P; Ziaei N; Tootiaee B; Khoshhal M; Vafaee F; Panahandeh N J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2019; 29(2):113-124. PubMed ID: 32464020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of internal hexagonal index on removal torque and tensile removal force of different Morse taper connection abutments. de Oliveira Silva TS; Mendes Alencar SM; da Silva Valente V; de Moura CDVS J Prosthet Dent; 2017 May; 117(5):621-627. PubMed ID: 27881313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Finite element analysis of the angulation designment of implant planning in the anterior maxilla]. Han LH; Qiu XX; Xing XN; Cai LY Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2015 Apr; 24(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 25938143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of angled abutments in the posterior maxillary region on tilted implants: a 3D finite element analysis. Chen P; Zhang J; Yao J; Hu F; Song L; Yu Y Med Biol Eng Comput; 2024 Aug; 62(8):2585-2597. PubMed ID: 38653881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical Effect of Prosthetic Connection and Implant Body Shape in Low-Quality Bone of Maxillary Posterior Single Implant-Supported Restorations. de Andrade CL; Carvalho MA; Del Bel Cury AA; Sotto-Maior BS Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):e92-7. PubMed ID: 27447166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of abutment angulation on micromotion level for immediately loaded dental implants: a 3-D finite element analysis. Kao HC; Gung YW; Chung TF; Hsu ML Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):623-30. PubMed ID: 18807557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of different abutment and restorative crown materials on stress distribution in single-unit implant-supported restorations: A 3D finite element stress analysis. Gökçimen G; Durkan R; Deste Gökay G; Oyar P J Prosthodont; 2024 Jun; 33(5):497-505. PubMed ID: 37434476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influences of internal tapered abutment designs on bone stresses around a dental implant: three-dimensional finite element method with statistical evaluation. Chu CM; Huang HL; Hsu JT; Fuh LJ J Periodontol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 21563947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]