These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39031794)
1. From plan to delivery: Machine learning based positional accuracy prediction of multi-leaf collimator and estimation of delivery effect in volumetric modulated arc therapy. Qiu M; Zhong J; Xiao Z; Deng Y J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Sep; 25(9):e14437. PubMed ID: 39031794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction of VMAT delivery accuracy with textural features calculated from fluence maps. Park JM; Kim JI; Park SY Radiat Oncol; 2019 Dec; 14(1):235. PubMed ID: 31870403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of the individual multileaf collimator positional deviations during dynamic IMRT delivery priori with artificial neural network. Osman AFI; Maalej NM; Jayesh K Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 47(4):1421-1430. PubMed ID: 31922604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Machine learning models to predict the delivered positions of Elekta multileaf collimator leaves for volumetric modulated arc therapy. Sivabhaskar S; Li R; Roy A; Kirby N; Fakhreddine M; Papanikolaou N J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Aug; 23(8):e13667. PubMed ID: 35670318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modulation indices and plan delivery accuracy of volumetric modulated arc therapy. Park JM; Kim JI; Park SY J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 20(6):12-22. PubMed ID: 31038843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of direct clinical consequences of MLC positional errors in volumetric-modulated arc therapy using 3D dosimetry system. Nithiyanantham K; Mani GK; Subramani V; Mueller L; Palaniappan KK; Kataria T J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):296–305. PubMed ID: 26699311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A tool for patient-specific prediction of delivery discrepancies in machine parameters using trajectory log files. Chuang KC; Giles W; Adamson J Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 48(3):978-990. PubMed ID: 33332618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Treatment plan complexity quantification for predicting gamma passing rates in patient-specific quality assurance for stereotactic volumetric modulated arc therapy. Xue X; Luan S; Ding Y; Li X; Li D; Wang J; Ma C; Jiang M; Wei W; Wang X J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Sep; 25(9):e14432. PubMed ID: 38889335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of MLC speed and acceleration on the plan delivery accuracy of VMAT. Park JM; Wu HG; Kim JH; Carlson JN; Kim K Br J Radiol; 2015 May; 88(1049):20140698. PubMed ID: 25734490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Texture analysis on the fluence map to evaluate the degree of modulation for volumetric modulated arc therapy. Park SY; Kim IH; Ye SJ; Carlson J; Park JM Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111718. PubMed ID: 25370632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A multi-institution evaluation of MLC log files and performance in IMRT delivery. Kerns JR; Childress N; Kry SF Radiat Oncol; 2014 Aug; 9():176. PubMed ID: 25112533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of MLC leaf positioning accuracy for static and dynamic IMRT treatments using DAVID in vivo dosimetric system. Karagoz G; Zorlu F; Yeginer M; Yildiz D; Ozyigit G J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):14-23. PubMed ID: 27074451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of MLC positioning deviations using log files and establishment of specific assessment parameters for different accelerators with IMRT and VMAT. Lin X; Sun T; Liu X; Zhang G; Yin Y Radiat Oncol; 2022 Jul; 17(1):123. PubMed ID: 35842671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do technological advances in linear accelerators improve dosimetric outcomes in stereotaxy? A head-on comparison of seven linear accelerators using volumetric modulated arc therapy-based stereotactic planning. Sarkar B; Pradhan A; Munshi A Indian J Cancer; 2016; 53(1):166-73. PubMed ID: 27146771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality assurance of non-coplanar, volumetric-modulated arc therapy employing a C-arm linear accelerator, featuring continuous patient couch rotation. Hirashima H; Nakamura M; Miyabe Y; Mukumoto N; Ono T; Iramina H; Mizowaki T Radiat Oncol; 2019 Apr; 14(1):62. PubMed ID: 30971273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multi-institutional investigation into the robustness of intra-cranial multi-target stereotactic radiosurgery plans to delivery errors. May L; Hardcastle N; Hernandez V; Saez J; Rosenfeld A; Poder J Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):910-921. PubMed ID: 38141043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of systematic MLC positional uncertainties on the quality of single-isocenter multi-target VMAT-SRS treatment plans. Prentou G; Pappas EP; Prentou E; Yakoumakis N; Paraskevopoulou C; Koutsouveli E; Pantelis E; Papagiannis P; Karaiskos P J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Aug; 23(8):e13708. PubMed ID: 35733367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detecting MLC modeling errors using radiomics-based machine learning in patient-specific QA with an EPID for intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Sakai M; Nakano H; Kawahara D; Tanabe S; Takizawa T; Narita A; Yamada T; Sakai H; Ueda M; Sasamoto R; Kaidu M; Aoyama H; Ishikawa H; Utsunomiya S Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 48(3):991-1002. PubMed ID: 33382467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implementation of phantom-less IMRT delivery verification using Varian DynaLog files and R/V output. Agnew CE; King RB; Hounsell AR; McGarry CK Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(21):6761-77. PubMed ID: 23032423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of beam-matched linacs quality/accuracy for interchanging SBRT or SRT patient using VMAT without replanning. Xu Z; Warrell G; Lee S; Colussi V; Zheng Y; Ellis R; Machtay M; Podder T J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 20(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 30402983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]