These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39032483)

  • 1. The temporal mismatch across listening sides affects cortical auditory evoked responses in normal hearing listeners and cochlear implant users with contralateral acoustic hearing.
    Dolhopiatenko H; Segovia-Martinez M; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2024 Sep; 451():109088. PubMed ID: 39032483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changes in visually and auditory attended audiovisual speech processing in cochlear implant users: A longitudinal ERP study.
    Weglage A; Layer N; Meister H; Müller V; Lang-Roth R; Walger M; Sandmann P
    Hear Res; 2024 Jun; 447():109023. PubMed ID: 38733710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cortical auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implant listeners via single electrode stimulation in relation to speech perception.
    Liebscher T; Alberter K; Hoppe U
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Dec; 57(12):933-940. PubMed ID: 30295156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Objective measure of binaural processing: Acoustic change complex in response to interaural phase differences.
    Fan Y; Gifford RH
    Hear Res; 2024 Jul; 448():109020. PubMed ID: 38763034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory cortical activity to different voice onset times in cochlear implant users.
    Han JH; Zhang F; Kadis DS; Houston LM; Samy RN; Smith ML; Dimitrijevic A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1603-1617. PubMed ID: 26616545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomarkers of auditory cortical plasticity and development of binaural pathways in children with unilateral hearing loss using a hearing aid.
    Kaplan-Neeman R; Greenbom T; Habiballah S; Henkin Y
    Hear Res; 2024 Sep; 451():109096. PubMed ID: 39116708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selective attention decoding in bimodal cochlear implant users.
    Dolhopiatenko H; Nogueira W
    Front Neurosci; 2022; 16():1057605. PubMed ID: 36711138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electric and acoustic harmonic integration predicts speech-in-noise performance in hybrid cochlear implant users.
    Bonnard D; Schwalje A; Gantz B; Choi I
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():223-230. PubMed ID: 29980380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Binaural cue sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients with acoustic hearing preservation.
    Gifford RH; Stecker GC
    Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107929. PubMed ID: 32182551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Recorded From Nucleus Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.
    Brown CJ; Jeon EK; Chiou LK; Kirby B; Karsten SA; Turner CW; Abbas PJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):723-32. PubMed ID: 26295607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cortical auditory evoked potentials as an objective measure of behavioral thresholds in cochlear implant users.
    Visram AS; Innes-Brown H; El-Deredy W; McKay CM
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():35-42. PubMed ID: 25959269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Aging Effects on Cortical Responses to Tones and Speech in Adult Cochlear-Implant Users.
    Xie Z; Stakhovskaya O; Goupell MJ; Anderson S
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2021 Dec; 22(6):719-740. PubMed ID: 34231111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rate dependent neural responses of interaural-time-difference cues in fine-structure and envelope.
    Hu H; Ewert SD; Kollmeier B; Vickers D
    PeerJ; 2024; 12():e17104. PubMed ID: 38680894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Objective assessment of electrode discrimination with the auditory change complex in adult cochlear implant users.
    Mathew R; Undurraga J; Li G; Meerton L; Boyle P; Shaida A; Selvadurai D; Jiang D; Vickers D
    Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():86-101. PubMed ID: 28826636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recovery function of the late auditory evoked potential in cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
    Zhang F; Samy RN; Anderson JM; Houston L
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009; 20(7):397-408. PubMed ID: 19928394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acoustic Change Complex Recorded in Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.
    Jeon EK; Mussoi BS; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ
    Audiol Neurootol; 2023; 28(3):151-157. PubMed ID: 36450234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spectro-temporal cues enhance modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
    Zheng Y; Escabí M; Litovsky RY
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():45-54. PubMed ID: 28601530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Extent of lateralization at large interaural time differences in simulated electric hearing and bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Baumgärtel RM; Hu H; Kollmeier B; Dietz M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2338. PubMed ID: 28464641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two are better than one: Differences in cortical EEG patterns during auditory and visual verbal working memory processing between Unilateral and Bilateral Cochlear Implanted children.
    Inguscio BMS; Cartocci G; Sciaraffa N; Nicastri M; Giallini I; Aricò P; Greco A; Babiloni F; Mancini P
    Hear Res; 2024 May; 446():109007. PubMed ID: 38608331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.