These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39035075)

  • 1. Similar Quality of Visual Working Memory Representations between Negative and Positive Attentional Templates.
    Chidharom M; Zafarmand M; Carlisle NB
    J Cogn; 2024; 7(1):55. PubMed ID: 39035075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The allocation of resources in visual working memory and multiple attentional templates.
    Kerzel D; Witzel C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 May; 45(5):645-658. PubMed ID: 30920252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Capacity limitations in template-guided multiple color search.
    Kerzel D; Grubert A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Jun; 29(3):901-909. PubMed ID: 34918268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can templates-for-rejection suppress real-world affective objects in visual search?
    Brown CRH; Derakshan N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Aug; 31(4):1843-1855. PubMed ID: 38316718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Probing early attention following negative and positive templates.
    Zhang Z; Gapelin N; Carlisle NB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jun; 82(3):1166-1175. PubMed ID: 31650519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual Working Memory Load Disrupts Template-guided Attentional Selection during Visual Search.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 30(12):1902-1915. PubMed ID: 30125222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiple representations in visual working memory simultaneously guide attention: The type of memory-matching representation matters.
    Fan L; Sun M; Xu M; Li Z; Diao L; Zhang X
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():126-137. PubMed ID: 30471521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Control of Single-color and Multiple-color Visual Search by Attentional Templates in Working Memory and in Long-term Memory.
    Grubert A; Carlisle NB; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Dec; 28(12):1947-1963. PubMed ID: 27458746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Foraging through multiple target categories reveals the flexibility of visual working memory.
    Kristjánsson T; Kristjánsson Á
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Feb; 183():108-115. PubMed ID: 29275949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Concurrent guidance of attention by multiple working memory items: Behavioral and computational evidence.
    Zhou C; Lorist MM; Mathôt S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Aug; 82(6):2950-2962. PubMed ID: 32394070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In competition for the attentional template: can multiple items within visual working memory guide attention?
    van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1450-64. PubMed ID: 24730738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bottom-up perceptual salience and top-down retro-cues concurrently determine state in visual working memory.
    Fan L; Zhang L; Diao L; Xu M; Chen R; Zhang X
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Mar; 74(3):459-470. PubMed ID: 32988297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The precision of attentional selection is far worse than the precision of the underlying memory representation.
    Kerzel D
    Cognition; 2019 May; 186():20-31. PubMed ID: 30739056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual working memory simultaneously guides facilitation and inhibition during visual search.
    Dube B; Basciano A; Emrich SM; Al-Aidroos N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1232-44. PubMed ID: 27055458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Activated long-term memory and visual working memory during hybrid visual search: Effects on target memory search and distractor memory.
    Saltzmann SM; Eich B; Moen KC; Beck MR
    Mem Cognit; 2024 Nov; 52(8):2156-2171. PubMed ID: 38528298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multiple states in visual working memory: Evidence from oculomotor capture by memory-matching distractors.
    Beck VM; Vickery TJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1340-1346. PubMed ID: 31037604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The allocation of working memory resources determines the efficiency of attentional templates in single- and dual-target search.
    Huynh Cong S; Kerzel D
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Dec; 151(12):2977-2989. PubMed ID: 35696178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Irrelevant features of distractors in intervening visual search tasks cause active visual working memory interference - the more difficult the search task, the more interference it causes.
    Lively Z; Ng GJP; Buetti S; Lleras A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Aug; 83(6):2410-2429. PubMed ID: 33977408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Task-Irrelevant Features in Visual Working Memory Influence Covert Attention: Evidence from a Partial Report Task.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Vision (Basel); 2019 Aug; 3(3):. PubMed ID: 31735843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.