These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39035261)
1. A two-year prospective study to compare the peri-implant parameters of posterior implant-supported single crowns with and without mesial proximal contact loss. Ko KW; Cheng CW; Hsu YJ; Chiu WP; Lin FC J Dent Sci; 2024 Jul; 19(3):1673-1679. PubMed ID: 39035261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interproximal contact loss between implant-supported restorations and adjacent natural teeth: A retrospective cross-sectional study of 83 restorations with an up to 10-year follow-up. Bompolaki D; Edmondson SA; Katancik JA J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar; 127(3):418-424. PubMed ID: 33342612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Effect of the vacuum-formed retainer on preventing the proximal contact loss between implant supported crown and adjacent natural teeth]. Zeng BJ; Guo Y; Yu RY Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Jun; 50(3):553-559. PubMed ID: 29930429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interproximal contact loss at implant sites: a retrospective clinical study with a 10-year follow-up. Gasser TJW; Papageorgiou SN; Eliades T; Hämmerle CHF; Thoma DS Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 May; 33(5):482-491. PubMed ID: 35194854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prevalence of Interproximal Contact Loss Between Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses and Adjacent Teeth and Its impact on Marginal Bone Loss: A Retrospective Study. Saber A; Chakar C; Mokbel N; Nohra J Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(3):625-630. PubMed ID: 32406662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interproximal open contacts between implant restorations and adjacent natural teeth as a risk-indicator for peri-implant disease-A cross-sectional study. Latimer JM; Gharpure AS; Kahng HJ; Aljofi FE; Daubert DM Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 May; 32(5):598-607. PubMed ID: 33629375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Occlusal change in posterior implant-supported single crowns and its association with peri-implant bone level: a 5-year prospective study. Ding Q; Luo Q; Tian Y; Zhang L; Xie Q; Zhou Y Clin Oral Investig; 2022 May; 26(5):4217-4227. PubMed ID: 35129663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Occlusion variation of posterior implant-supported single crown: a prospective 4-year follow-up study]. Ding Q; Luo Q; Li XL; Zhang L; Xie QF Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Mar; 56(3):244-250. PubMed ID: 33663153 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Zirconia implants: a promising alternative to titanium? Bradley H; Owen B; Keys W Evid Based Dent; 2021 Jan; 22(3):102-103. PubMed ID: 34561660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of interproximal peri-implant tissue and prosthesis contours on food impaction, tissue health and patients' quality of life. Chanthasan S; Mattheos N; Pisarnturakit PP; Pimkhaokham A; Subbalekha K Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Jul; 33(7):768-781. PubMed ID: 35578787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported single-tooth crowns: a 4-year prospective clinical study. Vigolo P; Givani A; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):260-5. PubMed ID: 15101598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Restorative angle of zirconia restorations cemented on non-original titanium bases influences the initial marginal bone loss: 5-year results of a prospective cohort study. Strauss FJ; Siegenthaler M; Hämmerle CHF; Sailer I; Jung RE; Thoma DS Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Jul; 33(7):745-756. PubMed ID: 35570366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Peri-implant conditions and marginal bone loss around cemented and screw-retained single implant crowns in posterior regions: A retrospective cohort study with up to 4 years follow-up. Shi JY; Jie-Ni ; Zhuang LF; Zhang XM; Fan LF; Lai HC PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0191717. PubMed ID: 29401469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. One-piece zirconia oral implants: one-year results from a prospective case series. 2. Three-unit fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) reconstruction. Kohal RJ; Patzelt SB; Butz F; Sahlin H J Clin Periodontol; 2013 May; 40(5):553-62. PubMed ID: 23506654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Single-tooth Morse taper connection implants after 1 year of functional loading: a multicentre study on 302 patients. Mangano C; Mangano F; Piatelli A; Lezzi G; Mangano A; La Colla L; Mangano A Eur J Oral Implantol; 2008; 1(4):305-15. PubMed ID: 20467637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of restorative margins position on one-stage laser-microgrooved implants-supported single screwed crowns: A clinical, biochemical, and microbiological analysis. Guarnieri R; Di Nardo D; Gaimari G; Miccoli G; Testarelli L Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Feb; 21(1):52-59. PubMed ID: 30475431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Clinical outcome of single posterior implant-supported monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated using full digital workflow and conventional workflow: a 3-year follow-up]. Gao SH; Guo DN; Zhou YS; Pan SX Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Mar; 57(3):272-279. PubMed ID: 35280005 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of proximal contact loss between implant-supported fixed dental prostheses and adjacent teeth in relation to influential factors and effects. A cross-sectional study. Byun SJ; Heo SM; Ahn SG; Chang M Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Jun; 26(6):709-14. PubMed ID: 24712313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]