These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39036960)

  • 1. Breast Cancer Screening With Automated Breast US and Mammography vs Handheld US and Mammography in Women With Dense Breasts in a Real-World Clinical Setting.
    Winkelman AJ; Tulenko K; Epstein SH; Nguyen JV; Ford C; Miller MM
    J Breast Imaging; 2024 Sep; 6(5):493-501. PubMed ID: 39036960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic performance of automated breast ultrasound and handheld ultrasound in women with dense breasts.
    Jia M; Lin X; Zhou X; Yan H; Chen Y; Liu P; Bao L; Li A; Basu P; Qiao Y; Sankaranarayanan R
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Jun; 181(3):589-597. PubMed ID: 32338323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of 3D-Automated Breast Ultrasound With Handheld Breast Ultrasound Regarding Detection and BI-RADS Characterization of Lesions in Dense Breasts: A Study of 592 Cases.
    Güldogan N; Yılmaz E; Arslan A; Küçükkaya F; Atila N; Arıbal E
    Acad Radiol; 2022 Aug; 29(8):1143-1148. PubMed ID: 34955365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The performance of 3D ABUS versus HHUS in the visualisation and BI-RADS characterisation of breast lesions in a large cohort of 1,886 women.
    Vourtsis A; Kachulis A
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):592-601. PubMed ID: 28828640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The diagnostic performance of automated versus handheld breast ultrasound and mammography in symptomatic outpatient women: a multicenter, cross-sectional study in China.
    Lin X; Jia M; Zhou X; Bao L; Chen Y; Liu P; Feng R; Zhang X; Zhu L; Wang H; Zhu Y; Tang G; Feng W; Li A; Qiao Y
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Feb; 31(2):947-957. PubMed ID: 32852589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcomes of Return to Routine Screening for BI-RADS 3 Lesions Detected at Supplemental Automated Whole-Breast Ultrasound in Women With Dense Breasts: A Prospective Study.
    Barr RG; DeSivestri A; Golatta M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Dec; 217(6):1313-1321. PubMed ID: 34259039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated breast ultrasound compared to hand-held ultrasound in surveillance after breast-conserving surgery.
    Depretto C; Liguori A; Primolevo A; Di Cosimo S; Cartia F; Ferranti C; Scaperrotta GP
    Tumori; 2021 Apr; 107(2):132-138. PubMed ID: 32552398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automated Breast Ultrasound Screening for Dense Breasts.
    Kim SH; Kim HH; Moon WK
    Korean J Radiol; 2020 Jan; 21(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 31920025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Integration of Handheld Ultrasound or Automated Breast Ultrasound among Women with Negative Mammographic Screening Findings: A Multi-center Population-based Study in China.
    Ren W; Yan H; Zhao X; Jia M; Zhang S; Zhang J; Li Z; Ming L; Zhang Y; Li H; He L; Li X; Cheng X; Yue L; Zhou W; Qiao Y; Zhao F
    Acad Radiol; 2023 Sep; 30 Suppl 2():S114-S126. PubMed ID: 37003874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of automated versus hand-held breast US in supplemental screening in asymptomatic women with dense breasts: is there a difference regarding woman preference, lesion detection and lesion characterization?
    Tutar B; Esen Icten G; Guldogan N; Kara H; Arıkan AE; Tutar O; Uras C
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 May; 301(5):1257-1265. PubMed ID: 32215718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic performance of 3D automated breast ultrasound (3D-ABUS) in a clinical screening setting-a retrospective study.
    Klein Wolterink F; Ab Mumin N; Appelman L; Derks-Rekers M; Imhof-Tas M; Lardenoije S; van der Leest M; Mann RM
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Aug; 34(8):5451-5460. PubMed ID: 38240805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adding 3D automated breast ultrasound to mammography screening in women with heterogeneously and extremely dense breasts: Report from a hospital-based, high-volume, single-center breast cancer screening program.
    Wilczek B; Wilczek HE; Rasouliyan L; Leifland K
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Sep; 85(9):1554-63. PubMed ID: 27501888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Potential of Adding Mammography to Handheld Ultrasound or Automated Breast Ultrasound to Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies in BI-RADS Ultrasound Category 4a: A Multicenter Hospital-Based Study in China.
    Ren W; Zhao X; Zhao X; Yan H; Hu S; Qiao Y; Xu Z; Zhao F
    Curr Oncol; 2023 Mar; 30(3):3301-3314. PubMed ID: 36975464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.
    Wenkel E; Heckmann M; Heinrich M; Schwab SA; Uder M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz WA; Janka R
    Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of automated breast ultrasonography to handheld ultrasonography in detecting and diagnosing breast lesions.
    Jeh SK; Kim SH; Choi JJ; Jung SS; Choe BJ; Park S; Park MS
    Acta Radiol; 2016 Feb; 57(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 25766727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic Performance of Adjunctive Imaging Modalities Compared to Mammography Alone in Women with Non-Dense and Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Hadadi I; Rae W; Clarke J; McEntee M; Ekpo E
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Aug; 21(4):278-291. PubMed ID: 33846098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance of Supplemental Imaging Modalities for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: Findings From an Umbrella Review and Primary Studies Analysis.
    Lobig F; Caleyachetty A; Forrester L; Morris E; Newstead G; Harris J; Blankenburg M
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2023 Jul; 23(5):478-490. PubMed ID: 37202338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recall rate of screening ultrasound with automated breast volumetric scanning (ABVS) in women with dense breasts: a first quarter experience.
    Arleo EK; Saleh M; Ionescu D; Drotman M; Min RJ; Hentel K
    Clin Imaging; 2014; 38(4):439-444. PubMed ID: 24768327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Double reading of automated breast ultrasound with digital mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening.
    Lee JM; Partridge SC; Liao GJ; Hippe DS; Kim AE; Lee CI; Rahbar H; Scheel JR; Lehman CD
    Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():119-125. PubMed ID: 30807927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.