These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Comparing methods to measure error in gynecologic cytology and surgical pathology. Renshaw AA Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 May; 130(5):626-9. PubMed ID: 16683876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Methods to Assess Measurement Error in Questionnaires of Sedentary Behavior. Sampson JN; Matthews CE; Freedman L; Carroll RJ; Kipnis V J Appl Stat; 2016; 43(9):1706-1721. PubMed ID: 27340315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimation of the mutation rate during error-prone polymerase chain reaction. Wang D; Zhao C; Cheng R; Sun F J Comput Biol; 2000; 7(1-2):143-58. PubMed ID: 10890392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. STRATOS guidance document on measurement error and misclassification of variables in observational epidemiology: Part 2-More complex methods of adjustment and advanced topics. Shaw PA; Gustafson P; Carroll RJ; Deffner V; Dodd KW; Keogh RH; Kipnis V; Tooze JA; Wallace MP; Küchenhoff H; Freedman LS Stat Med; 2020 Jul; 39(16):2232-2263. PubMed ID: 32246531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of three methods of estimating confidence intervals for stereotactic error. Butler WE Comput Aided Surg; 1999; 4(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 10417828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 99m Tc-ethylenedicysteine (99mTc-EC) renal clearance determination error for the multiple- and single-sample methods. Surma MJ Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur; 1998; 1(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 14601007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance difference of graph-based and alignment-based hybrid error correction methods for error-prone long reads. Wang A; Au KF Genome Biol; 2020 Jan; 21(1):14. PubMed ID: 31952552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurement error and misclassification in electronic medical records: methods to mitigate bias. Young JC; Conover MM; Funk MJ Curr Epidemiol Rep; 2018 Dec; 5(4):343-356. PubMed ID: 35633879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On the error propagation of semi-Lagrange and Fourier methods for advection problems. Einkemmer L; Ostermann A Comput Math Appl; 2015 Feb; 69(3):170-179. PubMed ID: 25844018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. "Exact" and approximate methods for analysis of total error in radiation measurements. Chambless DA; Dubose SS; Sensintaffar EL Health Phys; 1994 Mar; 66(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 8106251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correcting for measurement error in individual ancestry estimates in structured association tests. Divers J; Vaughan LK; Padilla MA; Fernandez JR; Allison DB; Redden DT Genetics; 2007 Jul; 176(3):1823-33. PubMed ID: 17507670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modeling matching error and its effect on estimates of census coverage error. Biemer PP Surv Methodol; 1988 Jun; 14(1):117-34, 125-43. PubMed ID: 12315617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mecor: An R package for measurement error correction in linear regression models with a continuous outcome. Nab L; van Smeden M; Keogh RH; Groenwold RHH Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Sep; 208():106238. PubMed ID: 34311414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of regression calibration and SIMEX methods in logistic regression when one of the predictors is subject to additive measurement error. Fung KY; Krewski D J Epidemiol Biostat; 1999; 4(2):65-74. PubMed ID: 10619053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hypothesis Testing Using Factor Score Regression: A Comparison of Four Methods. Devlieger I; Mayer A; Rosseel Y Educ Psychol Meas; 2016 Oct; 76(5):741-770. PubMed ID: 29795886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Error and bias in under-5 mortality estimates derived from birth histories with small sample sizes. Dwyer-Lindgren L; Gakidou E; Flaxman A; Wang H Popul Health Metr; 2013 Jul; 11(1):13. PubMed ID: 23885746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of the relative merits of a few methods to detect evolutionary trends. Laurin M Syst Biol; 2010 Dec; 59(6):689-704. PubMed ID: 20937759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparative study of k-spectrum-based error correction methods for next-generation sequencing data analysis. Akogwu I; Wang N; Zhang C; Gong P Hum Genomics; 2016 Jul; 10 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):20. PubMed ID: 27461106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The performance of methods for correcting measurement error in case-control studies. Stürmer T; Thürigen D; Spiegelman D; Blettner M; Brenner H Epidemiology; 2002 Sep; 13(5):507-16. PubMed ID: 12192219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]