These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39042281)

  • 1. The impact of social comparison on self-deception: An event-related potentials study.
    Yang Y; Zhong B; Zhang W; Fan W
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2024 Oct; 24(5):931-947. PubMed ID: 39042281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Effect of Comparative Direction and Comparative Gap on Self-Deception.
    Yang Y; Zhong B; Zhang W; Fan W
    Psychol Res Behav Manag; 2024; 17():2819-2834. PubMed ID: 39099587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying deceptive hazard evaluation: An event-related potentials investigation.
    Fu H; Qiu W; Ma H; Ma Q
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182892. PubMed ID: 28793344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Telling a truth to deceive: Examining executive control and reward-related processes underlying interpersonal deception.
    Sai L; Wu H; Hu X; Fu G
    Brain Cogn; 2018 Aug; 125():149-156. PubMed ID: 29990705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An event-related potential study of deception to self preferences.
    Tu S; Li H; Jou J; Zhang Q; Wang T; Yu C; Qiu J
    Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 1247():142-8. PubMed ID: 18952072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Internal cost of spontaneous deception revealed by ERPs and EEG spectral perturbations.
    Zhu C; Pan J; Li S; Liu X; Wang P; Li J
    Sci Rep; 2019 Apr; 9(1):5402. PubMed ID: 30931993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Don't trick me: An event-related potentials investigation of how price deception decreases consumer purchase intention.
    Fu H; Ma H; Bian J; Wang C; Zhou J; Ma Q
    Neurosci Lett; 2019 Nov; 713():134522. PubMed ID: 31568866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The processes leading to deception: ERP spatiotemporal principal component analysis and source analysis.
    Sun SY; Mai X; Liu C; Liu JY; Luo YJ
    Soc Neurosci; 2011; 6(4):348-59. PubMed ID: 21225491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tell me sweet little lies: An event-related potentials study on the processing of social lies.
    Moreno EM; Casado P; Martín-Loeches M
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 16(4):616-25. PubMed ID: 27007770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Altruistic and self-serving goals modulate behavioral and neural responses in deception.
    Cui F; Wu S; Wu H; Wang C; Jiao C; Luo Y
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2018 Jan; 13(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 29149322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The self in conflict: the role of executive processes during truthful and deceptive responses about attitudes.
    Johnson R; Henkell H; Simon E; Zhu J
    Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):469-82. PubMed ID: 17919934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A truth that's told with bad intent: an ERP study of deception.
    Carrión RE; Keenan JP; Sebanz N
    Cognition; 2010 Jan; 114(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 19836013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Social value orientation modulates context-based social comparison preference in the outcome evaluation: An ERP study.
    Qi Y; Wu H; Raiha S; Liu X
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Apr; 112():135-144. PubMed ID: 29501790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can you catch a liar? How negative emotions affect brain responses when lying or telling the truth.
    Proverbio AM; Vanutelli ME; Adorni R
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e59383. PubMed ID: 23536874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Competition influences outcome processing involving social comparison: An ERP study.
    Lin H; Liang J
    Psychophysiology; 2024 Apr; 61(4):e14477. PubMed ID: 37888488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Knowing when to trust others: an ERP study of decision making after receiving information from unknown people.
    Boudreau C; McCubbins MD; Coulson S
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2009 Mar; 4(1):23-34. PubMed ID: 19015085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Event-related potentials in response to early terminated and completed sequential decision-making.
    Fan J; Gu R; Lin Y; Luo YJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2023 Jul; 189():11-19. PubMed ID: 37075909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of event-related brain potentials (ERPs) to assess eyewitness accuracy and deception.
    Lefebvre CD; Marchand Y; Smith SM; Connolly JF
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep; 73(3):218-25. PubMed ID: 19303425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attempting to hide our real thoughts: electrophysiological evidence from truthful and deceptive responses during evaluation.
    Dong G; Wu H
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Jul; 479(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 20470861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Uninstructed BIAT faking when ego depleted or in normal state: differential effect on brain and behavior.
    Wolff W; Schindler S; Englert C; Brand R; Kissler J
    BMC Neurosci; 2016 May; 17(1):18. PubMed ID: 27142046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.