These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39043211)

  • 1. The Precision of All-on-Four Implant Position Recorded from Three Different CBCT Machines.
    Alsulimani O; Alhaddad A; Altassan M; Bukhari A; Munshi L; Sabir G
    Eur J Dent; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 39043211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of Implants Placed with Surgical Guides: Thermoplastic Versus 3D Printed.
    Bell CK; Sahl EF; Kim YJ; Rice DD
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2018; 38(1):113-119. PubMed ID: 29240212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variation in voxel value distribution and effect of time between exposures in six CBCT units.
    Spin-Neto R; Gotfredsen E; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(4):20130376. PubMed ID: 24678846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is Intraoral Scanning Accurate to Evaluate Dental Implant Position? An In-Vitro Study.
    Bergamaschi IP; Cortellazzi KL; Sverzut AT
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Apr; 81(4):441-455. PubMed ID: 36584976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of Orthopantomography and Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Presurgical Implant Planning: A Clinical Study.
    Sahota J; Bhatia A; Gupta M; Singh V; Soni J; Soni R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug; 18(8):665-669. PubMed ID: 28816186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Zirconia implants interfere with the evaluation of peri-implant bone defects in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images even with artifact reduction, a pilot study.
    Kuusisto N; Abushahba F; Syrjänen S; Huumonen S; Vallittu P; Närhi T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Nov; 52(8):20230252. PubMed ID: 37641961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative analysis of zirconia and titanium implant artefacts in three-dimensional virtual models of multi-slice CT and cone beam CT: does scan protocol matter?
    Matta RE; Knapp Giacaman S; Wiesmueller M; Lutz R; Uder M; Wichmann M; Seidel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Nov; 52(8):20230275. PubMed ID: 37641962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative study of the accuracy of CBCT implant site measurements using different software programs.
    Al-Ekrish AA
    Saudi Dent J; 2021 Sep; 33(6):355-361. PubMed ID: 34434039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of Implant Placement Position Using Nondental Open-Source Software: An In Vitro Study.
    Talmazov G; Bencharit S; Waldrop TC; Ammoun R
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Aug; 29(7):604-610. PubMed ID: 32495453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Method and accuracy of determining the jaw position of repositioning splint with the aid of digital technique].
    Fang SB; Yang GJ; Kang YF; Sun YC; Xie QF
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Dec; 53(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 33550339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of Mini-Implant Placement Using a Computer-Aided Designed Surgical Guide, with Information of Intraoral Scan and the Use of a Cone-Beam CT.
    Vasoglou G; Stefanidaki I; Apostolopoulos K; Fotakidou E; Vasoglou M
    Dent J (Basel); 2022 Jun; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 35735647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the accuracy of implants placed with CAD-CAM surgical templates manufactured with various 3D printers: An in vitro study.
    Herschdorfer L; Negreiros WM; Gallucci GO; Hamilton A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun; 125(6):905-910. PubMed ID: 32499166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retentive design of a small surgical guide for implant surgery: An in-vitro study.
    Kobe T; Fidler A; Kuralt M; Gašpirc B; Gašperšič R
    J Dent; 2023 Jan; 128():104384. PubMed ID: 36470471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discrepancy of complete-arch titanium frameworks manufactured using selective laser melting and electron beam melting additive manufacturing technologies.
    Revilla-León M; Ceballos L; Martínez-Klemm I; Özcan M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):942-947. PubMed ID: 30006219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of circumferential bone level assessment around single implants in healed ridges and extraction sockets using cone beam CT.
    Raes F; Renckens L; Aps J; Cosyn J; De Bruyn H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Oct; 15(5):661-72. PubMed ID: 22008055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the Accuracy of Implant Position Using Surgical Guides Fabricated by Additive and Subtractive Techniques.
    Henprasert P; Dawson DV; El-Kerdani T; Song X; Couso-Queiruga E; Holloway JA
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Jul; 29(6):534-541. PubMed ID: 32147893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of cone-beam CT technical image quality indicators and radiation dose for optimal STL model used in visual surgical planning.
    Koivisto J; Wolff J; Pauwels R; Kaasalainen T; Suomalainen A; Stoor P; Horelli J; Suojanen J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2024 Sep; 53(6):423-433. PubMed ID: 38913866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic Accuracy of CBCT for the Detection of Accessory Mental Foramina Using Different Devices and Imaging Modalities.
    Hui L; Hung K; Singh P; Montalvao C; Yeung AWK; Matinlinna JP; Bornstein MM
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2023; 43(3):311-316. PubMed ID: 37141079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Geometric Accuracy of Low-Dose and Standard-Dose Dental CBCT Imaging Protocols in CAD/CAM-Guided Dental Implant Surgery.
    Unger S; Penzenstadler M; Husain AA; Wiedemeier D; Stadlinger B; Valdec S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023; 38(2):287-294. PubMed ID: 36525261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital registration versus cone-beam computed tomography for evaluating implant position: a prospective cohort study.
    Han X; Wei D; Jiang X; Di P; Yi C; Lin Y
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):304. PubMed ID: 38438985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.