BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3904668)

  • 1. The effect of polymethylmethacrylate on bone: an experimental study.
    Goodman SB; Schatzker J; Sumner-Smith G; Fornasier VL; Goften N; Hunt C
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (1978); 1985; 104(3):150-4. PubMed ID: 3904668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of bulk versus particulate polymethylmethacrylate on bone.
    Goodman SB; Fornasier VL; Kei J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Jul; (232):255-62. PubMed ID: 3289814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A method for histological preparation of undecalcified bone sections containing acrylic bone cement.
    Jensen LN; Jensen JS; Gotfredsen K
    Biotech Histochem; 1991; 1(2):82-6. PubMed ID: 1714768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A study of intrusion characteristics of low viscosity cement Simplex-P and Palacos cements in a bovine cancellous bone model.
    Rey RM; Paiement GD; McGann WM; Jasty M; Harrigan TP; Burke DW; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1987 Feb; (215):272-8. PubMed ID: 3802646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prostaglandin E2 levels in the membrane surrounding bulk and particulate polymethylmethacrylate in the rabbit tibia. A preliminary study.
    Goodman SB; Chin RC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 Aug; (257):305-9. PubMed ID: 2199124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The bone-cement interface: histological observations on the interface of cemented arthroplasties within the immediate and late phases.
    Boss JH; Shajrawi I; Dekel S; Mendes DG
    J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 1993; 5(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 8155610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vivo versus in vitro polymerization of acrylic bone cement: effect on material properties.
    Bargar WL; Brown SA; Paul HA; Voegli T; Hseih Y; Sharkey N
    J Orthop Res; 1986; 4(1):86-9. PubMed ID: 3950811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of polymerization heat and monomers from acrylic cement on canine bone.
    Stürup J; Nimb L; Kramhøft M; Jensen JS
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1994 Feb; 65(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 8154277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of intramedullary polymethylmethacrylate on healing of intercalary cortical allografts in a canine model.
    Straw RC; Powers BE; Withrow SJ; Cooper MF; Turner AS
    J Orthop Res; 1992 May; 10(3):434-9. PubMed ID: 1569506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acute local tissue effects of polymerizing acrylic bone cement. An intravital microscopic study in the hamster's check pouch on the chemically induced microvascular changes.
    Linder L; Romanus M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1976; (115):303-12. PubMed ID: 1253493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biological response of new activated acrylic bone cements with antiseptic properties. Histomorphometric analysis.
    de la Torre B; Salvado M; Corchón MA; Vázquez B; Collía F; De Pedro JA; San Román J
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2007 May; 18(5):933-41. PubMed ID: 17216581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Histological examinations of remodelling proceedings on the cement-bone surface of endoprosthesis after implantation from 3-10 years ].
    Lintner F; Bösch P; Brand G
    Pathol Res Pract; 1982; 173(4):376-89. PubMed ID: 6750580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mechanical effects of intramedullary acrylic cement on osteotomy healing in rats.
    Reikerås O; Reigstad A
    J Orthop Trauma; 1988; 2(3):218-21. PubMed ID: 3225707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Porous acrylic cement: evaluation of a novel implant material.
    van Mullem PJ; de Wijn JR; Vaandrager JM
    Ann Plast Surg; 1988 Dec; 21(6):576-82. PubMed ID: 3071237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interaction of bone and hydroxyapatite filled 4-META/MMA-TBB bone cement in in vitro and in vivo environments.
    Lee RR
    J Philipp Dent Assoc; 1996; 48(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 9462058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Penetration and shear strength of cement-bone interfaces in vivo.
    MacDonald W; Swarts E; Beaver R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 Jan; (286):283-8. PubMed ID: 8425359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improved cortical histology after cementation with a new MMA-DMA-IBMA bone cement: an animal study.
    Nimb L; Stürup J; Jensen JS
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 May; 27(5):565-74. PubMed ID: 8314809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [A study on the mechanical properties of bone cement (methylmethacrylate) and its strength alteration in vivo (author's transl)].
    Kon H
    Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi; 1981 Jan; 55(1):71-83. PubMed ID: 7276662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methyl methacrylate concentrations in tissues adjacent to bone cement.
    Petty W
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1980 Jul; 14(4):427-34. PubMed ID: 7400196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Histological evaluation of apatite cement containing atelocollagen.
    Takechi M; Miyamoto Y; Ishikawas K; Momota Y; Yuasa T; Tatehara S; Takano H; Minamiguchi S; Nagayama M
    Dent Mater J; 2007 Mar; 26(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 17621934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.