These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39051141)

  • 1. A new method for scaling inlet flow waveform in hemodynamic analysis of aortic dissection.
    Wang K; Armour CH; Guo B; Dong Z; Xu XY
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2024 Sep; 40(9):e3855. PubMed ID: 39051141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of inlet velocity profile on predicted flow in type B aortic dissection.
    Armour CH; Guo B; Pirola S; Saitta S; Liu Y; Dong Z; Xu XY
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2021 Apr; 20(2):481-490. PubMed ID: 33068193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multi-modality image-based computational analysis of haemodynamics in aortic dissection.
    Dillon-Murphy D; Noorani A; Nordsletten D; Figueroa CA
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2016 Aug; 15(4):857-76. PubMed ID: 26416312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fluid-structure interaction simulations of patient-specific aortic dissection.
    Bäumler K; Vedula V; Sailer AM; Seo J; Chiu P; Mistelbauer G; Chan FP; Fischbein MP; Marsden AL; Fleischmann D
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2020 Oct; 19(5):1607-1628. PubMed ID: 31993829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modelling lower-limb peripheral arterial disease using clinically available datasets: impact of inflow boundary conditions on hemodynamic indices for restenosis prediction.
    Ninno F; Chiastra C; Colombo M; Dardik A; Strosberg D; Aboian E; Tsui J; Bartlett M; Balabani S; Díaz-Zuccarini V
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2024 Jun; 251():108214. PubMed ID: 38759252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting flow in aortic dissection: comparison of computational model with PC-MRI velocity measurements.
    Cheng Z; Juli C; Wood NB; Gibbs RG; Xu XY
    Med Eng Phys; 2014 Sep; 36(9):1176-84. PubMed ID: 25070022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of Numerical Simulations of Thoracic Aorta Hemodynamics: Comparison with In Vivo Measurements and Stochastic Sensitivity Analysis.
    Boccadifuoco A; Mariotti A; Capellini K; Celi S; Salvetti MV
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Dec; 9(4):688-706. PubMed ID: 30357714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of inlet waveforms on computational hemodynamics of patient-specific intracranial aneurysms.
    Xiang J; Siddiqui AH; Meng H
    J Biomech; 2014 Dec; 47(16):3882-90. PubMed ID: 25446264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Initial findings and potential applicability of computational simulation of the aorta in acute type B dissection.
    Cheng Z; Riga C; Chan J; Hamady M; Wood NB; Cheshire NJ; Xu Y; Gibbs RG
    J Vasc Surg; 2013 Feb; 57(2 Suppl):35S-43S. PubMed ID: 23336853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of inlet and outlet boundary conditions in image-based CFD modeling of aortic flow.
    Madhavan S; Kemmerling EMC
    Biomed Eng Online; 2018 May; 17(1):66. PubMed ID: 29843730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-dimensional modelling and hemodynamic simulation of the closure of multiple entry tears in type B aortic dissection.
    Liu H; Zhao G; Zhang GE; Xiong F; Hu S; Ouyang Y; Xiong F
    Med Phys; 2024 Jan; 51(1):42-53. PubMed ID: 38038366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computational fluid dynamics investigation of chronic aortic dissection hemodynamics versus normal aorta.
    Karmonik C; Müller-Eschner M; Partovi S; Geisbüsch P; Ganten MK; Bismuth J; Davies MG; Böckler D; Loebe M; Lumsden AB; von Tengg-Kobligk H
    Vasc Endovascular Surg; 2013 Nov; 47(8):625-31. PubMed ID: 24048257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigations into the Potential of Using Open Source CFD to Analyze the Differences in Hemodynamic Parameters for Aortic Dissections (Healthy versus Stanford Type A and B).
    Takeda R; Sato F; Yokoyama H; Sasaki K; Oshima N; Kuroda A; Takashima H; Li C; Honda S; Kamiya H
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2022 Feb; 79():310-323. PubMed ID: 34648855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aneurysmal growth in type-B aortic dissection: assessing the impact of patient-specific inlet conditions on key haemodynamic indices.
    Stokes C; Ahmed D; Lind N; Haupt F; Becker D; Hamilton J; Muthurangu V; von Tengg-Kobligk H; Papadakis G; Balabani S; Díaz-Zuccarini V
    J R Soc Interface; 2023 Sep; 20(206):20230281. PubMed ID: 37727072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the choice of outlet boundary conditions for patient-specific analysis of aortic flow using computational fluid dynamics.
    Pirola S; Cheng Z; Jarral OA; O'Regan DP; Pepper JR; Athanasiou T; Xu XY
    J Biomech; 2017 Jul; 60():15-21. PubMed ID: 28673664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient-specific compliant simulation framework informed by 4DMRI-extracted pulse wave Velocity: Application post-TEVAR.
    Girardin L; Lind N; von Tengg-Kobligk H; Balabani S; Díaz-Zuccarini V
    J Biomech; 2024 Oct; 175():112266. PubMed ID: 39232449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computational Study of Anatomical Risk Factors in Idealized Models of Type B Aortic Dissection.
    Ben Ahmed S; Dillon-Murphy D; Figueroa CA
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2016 Dec; 52(6):736-745. PubMed ID: 27561609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Impact of Cardiac Motion on Aortic Valve Flow Used in Computational Simulations of the Thoracic Aorta.
    Wendell DC; Samyn MM; Cava JR; Krolikowski MM; LaDisa JF
    J Biomech Eng; 2016 Sep; 138(9):0910011-09100111. PubMed ID: 27367143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of beta-blockers on hemodynamic parameters in patient-specific blood flow simulations of type-B aortic dissection: a virtual study.
    Abazari MA; Rafiei D; Soltani M; Alimohammadi M
    Sci Rep; 2021 Aug; 11(1):16058. PubMed ID: 34362955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The risk of stanford type-A aortic dissection with different tear size and location: a numerical study.
    Shi Y; Zhu M; Chang Y; Qiao H; Liu Y
    Biomed Eng Online; 2016 Dec; 15(Suppl 2):128. PubMed ID: 28155679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.