These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39056871)
1. Early Challenges in the Implementation of Automated CranialRebuild Freeware for Generation of Patient-Specific Cranial Implant Using Additive Manufacturing: A Pilot Project in Review. Strelko O; Aryal MR; Zack A; Alfawares Y; Remenyi R; Bayan IK; Briones YL; Holovenko Y; Maksymenko M; Sirko A; Anand S; Forbes JA Biomimetics (Basel); 2024 Jul; 9(7):. PubMed ID: 39056871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Toward global availability of low-cost, patient-specific cranial implants: creation and validation of automated CranialRebuild freeware application. Xu A; Venugopal V; Aryal MR; Alfawares Y; Matur AV; Cheng J; Kosco E; McConaha M; Ghalsasi O; Lockett D; Bal G; Andaluz N; Ngwenya LB; Anand S; Forbes J Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2023 Aug; 165(8):2219-2224. PubMed ID: 37351673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Customized alloplastic cranioplasty of large bone defects by 3D-printed prefabricated mold template after posttraumatic decompressive craniectomy: A technical note. Splavski B; Lakicevic G; Kovacevic M; Godec D Surg Neurol Int; 2022; 13():169. PubMed ID: 35509538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Early experience with patient-specific low-cost 3D-printed polymethylmethacrylate cranioplasty implants in a lower-middle-income-country: Technical note and economic analysis. Ashraf M; Choudhary N; Kamboh UA; Raza MA; Sultan KA; Ghulam N; Hussain SS; Ashraf N Surg Neurol Int; 2022; 13():270. PubMed ID: 35855120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of implant properties, safety profile and clinical efficacy of patient-specific acrylic prosthesis in cranioplasty using 3D binderjet printed cranium model: A pilot study. Basu B; Bhaskar N; Barui S; Sharma V; Das S; Govindarajan N; Hegde P; Perikal PJ; Antharasanahalli Shivakumar M; Khanapure K; Tekkatte Jagannatha A J Clin Neurosci; 2021 Mar; 85():132-142. PubMed ID: 33581784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Adjustable Cranial Plate: A Novel Implant Designed to Eliminate the Need for Cranioplasty Surgery Following a Hemicraniectomy Operation. Christianson D; Seaman SC; Ray E; Li L; Zanaty M; Lemoine P; Wilson G; Grimm D; Park BJ; Gold C; Andrews B; Grady S; Dlouhy K; Howard MA World Neurosurg; 2023 May; 173():e306-e320. PubMed ID: 36804433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Management of decompressive craniectomy defects: modern military treatment strategies. Tantawi D; Armonda R; Valerio I; Kumar AR J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(7 Suppl 1):2042-5. PubMed ID: 23154344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cranioplasty in the deployed environment: experience for host-country nationals. Porensky PN; Maloney PR; Kim JD; Dye JA; Liacouras PC J Neurosurg; 2023 Apr; 138(4):1058-1068. PubMed ID: 36057122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The intracranial pressure-volume relationship following decompressive hinge craniotomy compared to decompressive craniectomy-a human cadaver study. Søndergaard CB; Villa C; Jacobsen C; Lilja-Cyron A; Fugleholm K Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2023 Feb; 165(2):271-277. PubMed ID: 36369396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. First-In-Human Experience With Integration of Wireless Intracranial Pressure Monitoring Device Within a Customized Cranial Implant. Mitchell KS; Anderson W; Shay T; Huang J; Luciano M; Suarez JI; Manson P; Brem H; Gordon CR Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown); 2020 Sep; 19(3):341-350. PubMed ID: 31993644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cranioplasty of large cranial defect at an early stage after decompressive craniectomy performed for severe head trauma. Liang W; Xiaofeng Y; Weiguo L; Gang S; Xuesheng Z; Fei C; Gu L J Craniofac Surg; 2007 May; 18(3):526-32. PubMed ID: 17538313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of implant material and patient age on the long-term outcome of secondary cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury. Hamböck M; Hosmann A; Seemann R; Wolf H; Schachinger F; Hajdu S; Widhalm H Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2020 Apr; 162(4):745-753. PubMed ID: 32025876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Decompressive Craniectomy in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: The Intensivist's Point of View. Vitali M; Marasco S; Romenskaya T; Elia A; Longhitano Y; Zanza C; Abenavoli L; Scarpellini E; Bertuccio A; Barbanera A Diseases; 2023 Jan; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 36810536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [First Experience with Cranioplasty Using the Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Implant - Retrospective Five-Year Follow-up Study]. Šámal F; Ouzký M; Strnad J; Haninec P; Linzer P; Filip M Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2019; 86(6):431-434. PubMed ID: 31941571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Role of Decompressive Craniectomy in Limited Resource Environments. Clavijo A; Khan AA; Mendoza J; Montenegro JH; Johnson ED; Adeleye AO; Rubiano AM Front Neurol; 2019; 10():112. PubMed ID: 30863354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Decompressive Craniectomy for Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Lu G; Zhu L; Wang X; Zhang H; Li Y World Neurosurg; 2020 Jan; 133():e135-e148. PubMed ID: 31491576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]