These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39061617)

  • 1. Risk Assessment of Nasal Cavity Perforation in the Maxilla: A Virtual Implant Placement Study Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
    Kaya DI; Şatır S; Öztaş B; Yıldırım H; Aktı A
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2024 Jul; 14(14):. PubMed ID: 39061617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implant treatment planning regarding augmentation procedures: panoramic radiographs vs. cone beam computed tomography images.
    Dagassan-Berndt DC; Zitzmann NU; Walter C; Schulze RK
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Aug; 27(8):1010-6. PubMed ID: 26227397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing the precision of panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography in avoiding anatomical structures critical to dental implant surgery: A retrospective study.
    Özalp Ö; Tezerişener HA; Kocabalkan B; Büyükkaplan UŞ; Özarslan MM; Şimşek Kaya G; Altay MA; Sindel A
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2018 Dec; 48(4):269-275. PubMed ID: 30607351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability of Orthopantomography and Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Presurgical Implant Planning: A Clinical Study.
    Sahota J; Bhatia A; Gupta M; Singh V; Soni J; Soni R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug; 18(8):665-669. PubMed ID: 28816186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Avoiding Sinus Floor Elevation by Placing a Palatally Angled Implant: A Morphological Study Using Cross-Sectional Analysis Determined by CBCT.
    Kaya DI; Şatır S; Öztaş B; Yıldırım H
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2024 Jun; 14(12):. PubMed ID: 38928657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of Different Preosteotomy Determinants as Affecting the Success of Implant Therapy: A "CBCT"-based Clinical Study.
    Jain S; Kapoor K; Sethi K; Dahiya DR; Singh B; Sangwan R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Oct; 20(10):1212-1216. PubMed ID: 31883259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Planning of dental implant size with digital panoramic radiographs, CBCT-generated panoramic images, and CBCT cross-sectional images.
    Correa LR; Spin-Neto R; Stavropoulos A; Schropp L; da Silveira HE; Wenzel A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jun; 25(6):690-5. PubMed ID: 23442085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of linear measurements using cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in dental implant treatment planning.
    Luangchana P; Pornprasertsuk-Damrongsri S; Kiattavorncharoen S; Jirajariyavej B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1287-94. PubMed ID: 26574854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Virtual Dental Implant Planning Using the Full Cross-Sectional and Transaxial Capabilities of Cone Beam Computed Tomography vs Reformatted Panoramic Imaging and 3D Modeling.
    Khan M; Elathamna EN; Lin WS; Harris BT; Farman AG; Scheetz JP; Morton D; Scarfe WC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(4):814-9. PubMed ID: 26252033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of mini-implant sites in the posterior maxilla using traditional radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Abbassy MA; Sabban HM; Hassan AH; Zawawi KH
    Saudi Med J; 2015 Nov; 36(11):1336-41. PubMed ID: 26593168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative study between currently used methods and Small Volume-Cone Beam Tomography for surgical placement of mini implants.
    Landin M; Jadhav A; Yadav S; Tadinada A
    Angle Orthod; 2015 May; 85(3):446-53. PubMed ID: 25343688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implant-to-nasal floor dimensions projected by panoramic radiographs in the maxillary incisor-canine region: implications for dental implant treatment.
    Bertram A; Eckert AW; Emshoff R
    Odontology; 2022 Jan; 110(1):171-182. PubMed ID: 34191207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Panoramic images versus three-dimensional planning software for oral implant planning in atrophied posterior maxillary: a clinical radiological study.
    Fortin T; Camby E; Alik M; Isidori M; Bouchet H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 21477064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography versus conventional multidetector computed tomography for image-guided craniofacial implant planning: An in vitro study.
    Dings JP; Verhamme L; Merkx MA; Xi T; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):665–672. PubMed ID: 30934042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The reliability of surgeons to avoid traumatic insertion of dental implants into high-risk regions: a panoramic radiograph study.
    Jamil FA; Mohammed JA; Hasan TA; Rzoqi MG
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Apr; 20(1):96. PubMed ID: 32252728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of the position and level of mental nerve for placement of implants using cone-beam computed tomography & panoramic radiograph in the Saudi population.
    AlQahtani NA
    Saudi Dent J; 2022 May; 34(4):315-320. PubMed ID: 35692242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incidence of nasopalatine canal perforation in relation to virtual implant placement: A cone beam computed tomography study.
    Alkanderi A; Al Sakka Y; Koticha T; Li J; Masood F; Suárez-López Del Amo F
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Feb; 22(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 31829508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retrospective assessment of dental implant-related perforations of relevant anatomical structures and inadequate spacing between implants/teeth using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Gaêta-Araujo H; Oliveira-Santos N; Mancini AXM; Oliveira ML; Oliveira-Santos C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Sep; 24(9):3281-3288. PubMed ID: 31960132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of post-implant buccal bone resorption using cone beam computed tomography: a clinical pilot study.
    Vera C; De Kok IJ; Chen W; Reside G; Tyndall D; Cooper LF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(5):1249-57. PubMed ID: 23057042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of Anatomical Depictions in Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)-Reconstructed Panoramic Projections Compared to Conventional Panoramic Radiographs: A Clinical Risk-Benefit Analysis.
    Jadhav A; Desai NG; Tadinada A
    Cureus; 2023 Sep; 15(9):e44723. PubMed ID: 37809250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.