These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Sanitary napkin contact dermatitis of the vulva: location-dependent differences in skin surface conditions may play a role in negative patch test results. Wakashin K J Dermatol; 2007 Dec; 34(12):834-7. PubMed ID: 18078410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Atypical and unusual clinical manifestations of contact dermatitis to clothing (textile contact dermatitis): case presentation and review of the literature. Lazarov A; Cordoba M; Plosk N; Abraham D Dermatol Online J; 2003 Aug; 9(3):1. PubMed ID: 12952748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Periocular dermatitis: a report of 401 patients. Temesvári E; Pónyai G; Németh I; Hidvégi B; Sas A; Kárpáti S J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2009 Feb; 23(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 18761544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contact dermatitis and urticaria from environmental exposures. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Am Fam Physician; 1993 Oct; 48(5):773-80. PubMed ID: 8213408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Epicutaneous test in hypersensitivity to adhesive tape]. Schubert H Allerg Asthma (Leipz); 1970; 16(4):157-61. PubMed ID: 5524332 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparative studies on various test methods in allergic contact sensitization against neomycin-sulfate]. Bielický T; Novák M Z Haut Geschlechtskr; 1971 Nov; 46(21):771-7. PubMed ID: 4256382 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Orofacial abnormalities in the treatment of scoliosis by means of the Milwaukee corset]. Pavsic I; Bizjak F Osterr Z Stomatol; 1972 Sep; 69(9):337-42. PubMed ID: 4507005 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]