These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3906323)

  • 1. Clinical trials with a 22-channel cochlear prosthesis.
    Cohen NL; Waltzman SB; Shapiro WH
    Laryngoscope; 1985 Dec; 95(12):1448-54. PubMed ID: 3906323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: Part I--laboratory tests.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 19864954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Audiological application criteria for implantable hearing aid devices: a clinical experience at the Nijmegen ORL clinic.
    Verhaegen VJ; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW; Snik AF
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Sep; 118(9):1645-9. PubMed ID: 18677283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A novel implantable hearing system with direct acoustic cochlear stimulation.
    Häusler R; Stieger C; Bernhard H; Kompis M
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):247-56. PubMed ID: 18259077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical results using a multiple-channel cochlear prosthesis.
    Dowell RC; Webb RL; Clark GM
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1984; 411():230-6. PubMed ID: 6596847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cochlear implant hearing performance at the University of Minnesota.
    Kimberley BP; Lee A; Scheller L; Levine S; Adams G; Nelson DA
    J Otolaryngol; 1989 Feb; 18(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 2921782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cochlear implantation in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 and bilateral vestibular schwannoma.
    Lustig LR; Yeagle J; Driscoll CL; Blevins N; Francis H; Niparko JK
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Jun; 27(4):512-8. PubMed ID: 16791043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech perception with the ACE and the SPEAK speech coding strategies for children implanted with the Nucleus cochlear implant.
    Manrique M; Huarte A; Morera C; Caballé L; Ramos A; Castillo C; García-Ibáñez L; Estrada E; Juan E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Dec; 69(12):1667-74. PubMed ID: 16168497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Results of a preliminary clinical trial on a multiple channel cochlear prosthesis.
    Dowell RC; Martin LF; Clark GM; Brown AM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1985; 94(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 3160295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence-based guidelines for recommending cochlear implantation for young children: Audiological criteria and optimizing age at implantation.
    Leigh JR; Dettman SJ; Dowell RC
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S9-S18. PubMed ID: 27142630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Alterations of speech audiometry in presbycusis brought about by cochlear acoustic emissions].
    Bonfils P
    J Otolaryngol; 1988 Aug; 17(5):207-10. PubMed ID: 3216441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf.
    Faulkner A; Walliker JR; Howard IS; Ball V; Fourcin AJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of programming threshold and maplaw settings on acoustic thresholds and speech discrimination with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant.
    Boyd PJ
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):608-18. PubMed ID: 17086073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cochlear implants in the management of bilateral acoustic neuromas.
    Hoffman RA; Kohan D; Cohen NL
    Am J Otol; 1992 Nov; 13(6):525-8. PubMed ID: 1449178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical trial of a multiple-channel cochlear prosthesis. An initial study in four patients with profound total hearing loss.
    Clark GM; Dowell RC; Brown AM; Luscombe SM; Pyman BC; Webb RL; Bailey QR; Seligman PM; Tong YC
    Med J Aust; 1983 Oct; 2(9):430-3. PubMed ID: 6355794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of multichannel tactile aids and multichannel cochlear implants in children with profound hearing impairments.
    Miyamoto RT; Robbins AM; Osberger MJ; Todd SL; Riley AI; Kirk KI
    Am J Otol; 1995 Jan; 16(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 8579182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensorineural hearing loss after occlusion of the enlarged vestibular aqueduct.
    Welling DB; Slater PW; Martyn MD; Antonelli PJ; Gantz BJ; Luxford WM; Shelton C
    Am J Otol; 1999 May; 20(3):338-43. PubMed ID: 10337975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.