These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39064486)
21. [Clinical outcome and high risk factor for residual lesion analysis of HSIL half a year after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a clinical study of 1 502 cases]. Liu L; Chen LM; Tao X; Dai F; Guo LP; Zhang HW; Zhou XR; Sui L Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):751-756. PubMed ID: 29179270 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Outcomes of carbon dioxide laser conization for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III. Stamatopoulos P; Kasapis M; Koliopoulos G; Paraskevaidis E Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2001; 28(4):243-5. PubMed ID: 11838749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Modified method of cervical conization with hybrid use of a cold knife and an electric knife for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. Zhang W; Lin Y J Int Med Res; 2022 Jun; 50(6):3000605221106414. PubMed ID: 35726589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Reasonable surgical approach for grade III cervical intraepithelial neoplasia]. Wu X; Cui Y; Gong Y; Xu H; Jiang D; Meng S Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2012 Aug; 37(8):824-8. PubMed ID: 22954923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. What is the value of pre-surgical variables in addition to cone dimensions in predicting cone margin status? Giannella L; Di Giuseppe J; Prandi S; Delli Carpini G; Tsiroglou D; Ciavattini A Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Jan; 244():180-184. PubMed ID: 31812841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of the risk of recurrent disease-a 16-year follow-up study. Alder S; Megyessi D; Sundström K; Östensson E; Mints M; Belkić K; Arbyn M; Andersson S Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 222(2):172.e1-172.e12. PubMed ID: 31473226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [LEEP versus cold knife conization for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasias]. Hillemanns P; Kimmig R; Dannecker C; Noorzai T; Diebold J; Thaler CJ; Hepp H Zentralbl Gynakol; 2000; 122(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 10785949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A randomized prospective study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP. Mathevet P; Dargent D; Roy M; Beau G Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Aug; 54(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 8063242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Clinicopathologic outcomes of laser conization for high-grade cervical dysplasia. dos Santos L; Odunsi K; Lele S Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2004; 25(3):305-7. PubMed ID: 15171305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Factors of recurrence of intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix]. Pires MA; Dias M; Oliveira C; De Oliveira HM Acta Med Port; 2000; 13(5-6):259-63. PubMed ID: 11234489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Necessity for subsequent surgery in women of child-bearing age with positive margins after conization. Wang X; Xu J; Gao Y; Qu P BMC Womens Health; 2021 May; 21(1):191. PubMed ID: 33962590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The effects of different instruments and suture methods of conization for cervical lesions. Wang X; Li L; Bi Y; Wu H; Wu M; Lang J Sci Rep; 2019 Dec; 9(1):19114. PubMed ID: 31836814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Post-cervical conization outcomes in patients with high-grade intraepithelial lesions. Simões RB; Campaner AB APMIS; 2013 Dec; 121(12):1153-61. PubMed ID: 23607318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Laser conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasias, grade III. Personal experience of 77 cases]. Diotallevi FF; Iacovelli A; Vincenzoni C; Atlante M Minerva Ginecol; 2002 Dec; 54(6):467-70. PubMed ID: 12432328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia]. Lu HX; Chen YX; Ni J; Wan XY; Lü WG; Xie X Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 44(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 19570446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Long term outcomes of laser conization for high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in Thai women. Wongtiraporn W; Laiwejpithaya S; Sangkarat S; Benjapibal M; Rattanachaiyanont M; Ruengkhachorn I; Chaopotong P; Laiwejpithaya S Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(18):7757-61. PubMed ID: 25292059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Risk of cervical stenosis after large loop excision or laser conization. Baldauf JJ; Dreyfus M; Ritter J; Meyer P; Philippe E Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Dec; 88(6):933-8. PubMed ID: 8942830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Value of endocervical margin and high-risk human papillomavirus status after conization for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, adenocarcinoma in situ, and microinvasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Kong TW; Son JH; Chang SJ; Paek J; Lee Y; Ryu HS Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Dec; 135(3):468-73. PubMed ID: 25284039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Factors That Influence Surgical Margin State in Patients Undergoing Cold Knife Conization - A Single Center Experience. Aluloski I; Tanturovski M; Petrusevska G; Jovanovic R; Kostadinova-Kunovska S Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki); 2017 Dec; 38(3):113-120. PubMed ID: 29668476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]