These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39074835)

  • 1. A Comparison of Esthetic Preferences on Female Skeletal Class II Alterations among Laypeople of Different Facial Profiles.
    Tipyanggul W; Changsiripun C; Chamnannidiadha N
    Eur J Dent; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 39074835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of forehead and neck position on esthetics of class I, II and III profiles.
    Salehi P; Oshagh M; Aleyasin ZS; Pakshir HR
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(3):412-25. PubMed ID: 25126620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of anteroposterior lip positions in the most-favored Iranian facial profiles using silhouette.
    Sodagar A; Borujeni DG
    J Dent (Tehran); 2013 Sep; 10(5):393-404. PubMed ID: 24910646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of Age on Perception of Best Esthetical Profile.
    Salehi P; Azadeh N; Beigi N; Farzin M
    J Dent (Shiraz); 2019 Mar; 20(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 30937332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A CBCT Evaluation of Esthetic Preference Regarding the Perceived Facial Attractiveness of Young Korean Female Adults with a Normal Skeletal Pattern.
    Oh JH; Park JH; Cho HJ; Seo HY; Chae JM
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(19):. PubMed ID: 36236357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Facial attractiveness of skeletal class I and class II malocclusion as perceived by laypeople, patients and clinicians.
    Pace M; Cioffi I; D'antò V; Valletta A; Valletta R; Amato M
    Minerva Stomatol; 2018 Jun; 67(3):77-85. PubMed ID: 29308854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of lower facial height and anteroposterior lip position on esthetic preference for Korean silhouette profiles.
    Seo KH; So DH; Song KT; Choi SK; Kang KH
    Korean J Orthod; 2021 Nov; 51(6):419-427. PubMed ID: 34803030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Esthetic evaluation of incisor inclination in smiling profiles with respect to mandibular position.
    Zarif Najafi H; Oshagh M; Khalili MH; Torkan S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Sep; 148(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 26321336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of laterality on esthetic preferences of orthodontists, maxillofacial surgeons, and laypeople regarding the lip position and facial convexity: a psychometric clinical trial.
    Mousavi SM; Saeidi Ghorani P; Deilamani A; Rakhshan V
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Dec; 23(4):439-451. PubMed ID: 31446526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of lip position on esthetics perception with respect to profile divergence using silhouette images.
    Alshammari AK; Algharbi MA; Alshammari SK; Alenzi AA; Malik YR; Abideen MZ; Siddiqui AA; Madfa AA
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Oct; 23(1):791. PubMed ID: 37875850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Facial profile esthetic preferences: perception in two Brazilian states.
    Oliveira MD; Silveira BL; Mattos CT; Marquezan M
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(3):88-95. PubMed ID: 26154461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the Influence of Nasolabial Angle, Upper Sulcus Depth, and Nasal Tip Protrusion in the Perception of Facial Attractiveness.
    Jha N; Bamal R; Khairwa MK; Kalawat A; Yadav L; Sharma S
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2024 Feb; 16(Suppl 1):S329-S334. PubMed ID: 38595513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Facial profile preferences, self-awareness and perception among groups of people in the United Arab Emirates.
    Al Taki A; Guidoum A
    J Orthod Sci; 2014 Apr; 3(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 24987664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preferences of color and lip position for facial attractiveness by laypersons and orthodontists.
    Shi Q; Zheng H; Hu R
    Patient Prefer Adherence; 2016; 10():355-61. PubMed ID: 27051277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Photos vs silhouettes for evaluation of African American profile esthetics.
    Hockley A; Weinstein M; Borislow AJ; Braitman LE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Feb; 141(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 22284283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attractiveness assessment by orthodontists and laypeople judging female profile modifications of Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Kalin K; Iskender SY; Kuitert R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Aug; 160(2):276-282. PubMed ID: 34006425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors influencing the perception of profile beauty in Class III dental compensation: A comparative cross-sectional study according to three categories of assessors.
    El Khoury K; Ghoubril J; Kassis A; Khoury E
    Int Orthod; 2023 Sep; 21(3):100784. PubMed ID: 37331196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Esthetic perceptions of facial silhouettes after treatment with a mandibular protraction appliance.
    Molina de Paula EC; de Castro Ferreira Conti AC; Siqueira DF; Valarelli DP; de Almeida-Pedrin RR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Feb; 151(2):311-316. PubMed ID: 28153160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Influence of chin prominence on anterior-posterior lip positions of facial profile].
    Su YY; Wang CL; Liu DX; Dong RP; Li H
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2008 Dec; 17(6):598-602. PubMed ID: 19148446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ricketts' E-line profile preferences among Nigerian orthodontists, orthodontic trainees, and a young undergraduate students' population.
    Otuyemi O; Afolabi D; Oyewole T
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2022 Apr; 25(4):541-547. PubMed ID: 35439916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.