These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39077296)

  • 21. The impact of mandibular partial edentulous distal extension on virtual occlusal record accuracy when using two different intraoral scanners: An in vitro analysis.
    Tian J; Jung RE; Han Y; Mei Y; Di P
    J Dent; 2024 Nov; 150():105303. PubMed ID: 39134116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of the dental arch and number of cutting-off and rescanning mesh holes on the accuracy of implant scans in partially edentulous situations.
    Gómez-Polo M; Immorlano MG; Cascos-Sánchez R; Ortega R; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Revilla-León M
    J Dent; 2023 Oct; 137():104667. PubMed ID: 37595865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of rescanning mesh holes on the accuracy of an intraoral scanner: An in vivo study.
    Revilla-León M; Quesada-Olmo N; Gómez-Polo M; Sicilia E; Farjas-Abadia M; Kois JC
    J Dent; 2021 Dec; 115():103851. PubMed ID: 34656658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy of a chairside intraoral scanner compared with a laboratory scanner for the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro 3-dimensional comparative analysis.
    Zarone F; Ruggiero G; Ferrari M; Mangano F; Joda T; Sorrentino R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):761.e1-761.e7. PubMed ID: 33289647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Intraoral Scans of Full Dental Arches: An In Vitro Measurement Study of the Accuracy of Different Intraoral Scanners.
    Giuliodori G; Rappelli G; Aquilanti L
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Mar; 20(6):. PubMed ID: 36981684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accuracy of complete-arch intraoral scans based on confocal microscopy versus optical triangulation: A comparative in vitro study.
    Waldecker M; Rues S; Rammelsberg P; Bömicke W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Sep; 126(3):414-420. PubMed ID: 32950254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Trueness and precision of complete arch dentate digital models produced by intraoral and desktop scanners: An ex-vivo study.
    Vag J; Stevens CD; Badahman MH; Ludlow M; Sharp M; Brenes C; Mennito A; Renne W
    J Dent; 2023 Dec; 139():104764. PubMed ID: 37898433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluating the influence of palate scanning on the accuracy of complete-arch digital impressions-An in vitro study.
    Schmalzl J; Keskeny GÁ; Hermann P; Pál A; Géczi Z; Borbély J; Róth I
    J Dent; 2024 Jun; 145():105014. PubMed ID: 38648874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine.
    Revilla-León M; Att W; Özcan M; Rubenstein J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):470-478. PubMed ID: 32386912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital and 3D-printed casts compared with conventional stone casts.
    Ellakany P; Al-Harbi F; El Tantawi M; Mohsen C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar; 127(3):438-444. PubMed ID: 33308856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of software updates on the trueness and precision of intraoral scanners.
    Vág J; Renne W; Revell G; Ludlow M; Mennito A; Teich ST; Gutmacher Z
    Quintessence Int; 2021 Jun; 52(7):636-644. PubMed ID: 33749223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro.
    Ender A; Zimmermann M; Mehl A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 30848250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accuracy of intraoral scanning using modified scan bodies for complete arch implant-supported fixed prostheses.
    Li Y; Fang H; Yan Y; Geng W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 39079817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy of four recent intraoral scanners with respect to two different ceramic surfaces.
    Yatmaz BB; Raith S; Reich S
    J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104414. PubMed ID: 36640842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accuracy of three digital scanning methods for complete-arch tooth preparation: An in vitro comparison.
    Gao H; Liu X; Liu M; Yang X; Tan J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1001-1008. PubMed ID: 33736864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of the accuracy of full-arch impressions between three different intraoral scanners and conventional impressions: A prospective in vivo study.
    Bhatia N; Muthuswamy Pandian S
    J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2024; 18(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 38881640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Trueness of intraoral scanning of edentulous arches: A comparative clinical study.
    Al Hamad KQ; Al-Kaff FT
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Jan; 32(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 35997079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Do digital impressions have a greater accuracy for full-arch implant-supported reconstructions compared to conventional impressions? An
    Shaikh M; Lakha T; Kheur S; Qamri B; Kheur M
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2022; 22(4):398-404. PubMed ID: 36511075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In vitro comparison of five desktop scanners and an industrial scanner in the evaluation of an intraoral scanner accuracy.
    Borbola D; Berkei G; Simon B; Romanszky L; Sersli G; DeFee M; Renne W; Mangano F; Vag J
    J Dent; 2023 Feb; 129():104391. PubMed ID: 36549570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of definitive and interim restorative materials and surface finishing on the scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner.
    Revilla-León M; Young K; Sicilia E; Cho SH; Kois JC
    J Dent; 2022 May; 120():104114. PubMed ID: 35358659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.