These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39077296)
41. Accuracy of Complete-Arch Implant Digital Scans: Effect of Scanning Protocol, Number of Implants, and Scan Body Splinting. Denneulin T; Rignon-Bret C; Ravalec G; Tapie L; Bouter D; Wulfman C Int J Prosthodont; 2023 May; 36(2):219-227. PubMed ID: 36288490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Complete-arch accuracy of intraoral scanners. Treesh JC; Liacouras PC; Taft RM; Brooks DI; Raiciulescu S; Ellert DO; Grant GT; Ye L J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):382-388. PubMed ID: 29724554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Effect of implant scan body geometric modifications on the trueness and scanning time of complete arch intraoral implant digital scans: An in vitro study. Lawand G; Ismail Y; Revilla-León M; Tohme H J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1189-1197. PubMed ID: 35864021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Understanding the effect of scan spans on the accuracy of intraoral and desktop scanners. Chen Y; Zhai Z; Watanabe S; Nakano T; Ishigaki S J Dent; 2022 Sep; 124():104220. PubMed ID: 35817227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Effect of scan powder and scanning technology on measured deviations of complete-arch implant supported frameworks digitized with industrial and intraoral scanners. Donmez MB; Çakmak G; Dede DÖ; Küçükekenci AS; Lu WE; Schumacher FL; Revilla-León M; Yilmaz B J Dent; 2023 Nov; 138():104736. PubMed ID: 37802291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Effect of scan pattern on complete-arch scans with 4 digital scanners. Latham J; Ludlow M; Mennito A; Kelly A; Evans Z; Renne W J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 30982616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Impact of different scanning strategies on the accuracy of two current intraoral scanning systems in complete-arch impressions: an in vitro study. Passos L; Meiga S; Brigagão V; Street A Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(4):307-319. PubMed ID: 31840139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Effect of relative humidity on the accuracy, scanning time, and number of photograms of dentate complete arch intraoral digital scans. Agustín-Panadero R; Estada MIC; Alonso Pérez-Barquero J; Zubizarreta-Macho Á; Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M J Prosthet Dent; 2023 May; ():. PubMed ID: 37210222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Influence of the surface humidity, implant angulation, and interimplant distance on the accuracy and scanning time of complete-arch implant scans. Gómez-Polo M; Ortega R; Sallorenzo A; Agustín-Panadero R; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Revilla-León M J Dent; 2022 Dec; 127():104307. PubMed ID: 36162637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons. Renne W; Ludlow M; Fryml J; Schurch Z; Mennito A; Kessler R; Lauer A J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 28024822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Effect of Scanner Type and Scan Body Location on the Accuracy of Mandibular Complete-Arch Digital Implant Scans: An In Vitro Study. Çakmak G; Yilmaz H; Treviño Santos A; Kökat AM; Yilmaz B J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 31(5):419-426. PubMed ID: 34453466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Accuracy of intraoral scanners in different complete arch scan patterns. Pattamavilai S; Ongthiemsak C J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; 131(1):155-162. PubMed ID: 35256181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. In vitro evaluation of the accuracy and precision of intraoral and extraoral complete-arch scans. Baghani MT; Shayegh SS; Johnston WM; Shidfar S; Hakimaneh SMR J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Nov; 126(5):665-670. PubMed ID: 33070974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Influence of arch location and scanning pattern on the scanning accuracy, scanning time, and number of photograms of complete-arch intraoral digital implant scans. Gómez-Polo M; Cascos R; Ortega R; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Revilla-León M Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Jun; 34(6):591-601. PubMed ID: 37052054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Effect of splinting scan bodies on the trueness of complete arch digital implant scans with 5 different intraoral scanners. Azevedo L; Marques T; Karasan D; Fehmer V; Sailer I; Correia A; Gómez-Polo M J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):204-210. PubMed ID: 37537105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Influence of different material substrates on the accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners: A single-blinded in vitro study. Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Tsagarakis A; Lampropoulos P Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(1):82–93. PubMed ID: 33751003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Impact of intraoral scanner, scanning strategy, and scanned arch on the scan accuracy of edentulous arches: An in vitro study. Jamjoom FZ; Aldghim A; Aldibasi O; Yilmaz B J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1218-1225. PubMed ID: 36841708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Effect of Virtual Casts Superimposition Strategies on the Estimation of IOS Accuracy in Complete-Arch Scans. Grande F; Mussano F; Mosca Balma A; Lepidi L; Nuytens P; Mijiritsky E; Catapano S Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2024 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 39404152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Influence of ambient temperature changes on intraoral scanning accuracy. Revilla-León M; Gohil A; Barmak AB; Gómez-Polo M; Pérez-Barquero JA; Att W; Kois JC J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Nov; 130(5):755-760. PubMed ID: 35210107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Conventional open-tray impression versus intraoral digital scan for implant-level complete-arch impression. Kim KR; Seo KY; Kim S J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Dec; 122(6):543-549. PubMed ID: 30955939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]