These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39077296)

  • 61. Impact of digital intraoral scan strategies on the impression accuracy using the TRIOS Pod scanner.
    Müller P; Ender A; Joda T; Katsoulis J
    Quintessence Int; 2016 Apr; 47(4):343-9. PubMed ID: 26824085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Full-arch accuracy of five intraoral scanners:
    Kwon M; Cho Y; Kim DW; Kim M; Kim YJ; Chang M
    Korean J Orthod; 2021 Mar; 51(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 33678625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. In vivo trueness and precision of full-arch implant scans using intraoral scanners with three different acquisition protocols.
    Nedelcu R; Olsson P; Thulin M; Nyström I; Thor A
    J Dent; 2023 Jan; 128():104308. PubMed ID: 36481688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Application of the virtual-fit method for fixed complete denture cases designed on intraoral scans: Effect of cement spacing.
    Vag J; Romanszky L; Sersli G; DeFee M; Renne W; Mangano F; Borbola D
    J Dent; 2024 Feb; 141():104780. PubMed ID: 37981046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. 3D analysis of occlusal registration through geometry embedded library matching between quadrant and full-arch digital impression.
    Jeong Y; Kim YK; Shim JS; Lee H
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jul; 27(7):3771-3778. PubMed ID: 37039957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions for Whole Upper Jaws, Including Full Dentitions and Palatal Soft Tissues.
    Gan N; Xiong Y; Jiao T
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158800. PubMed ID: 27383409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. The effect of scanned area on the accuracy and time of anterior single implant scans: An in vitro study.
    Yilmaz B; Rizzo Marques V; Guo X; Gouveia D; Abou-Ayash S
    J Dent; 2021 Jun; 109():103620. PubMed ID: 33647374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning, and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an in vitro comparative study.
    Ma B; Yue X; Sun Y; Peng L; Geng W
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):636. PubMed ID: 34893053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Effect of intraoral scanner and fixed partial denture situation on the scan accuracy of multiple implants: An in vitro study.
    Donmez MB; Mathey A; Gäumann F; Mathey A; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Jun; 25(3):502-510. PubMed ID: 36762495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. In Vitro Trueness and Precision of Intraoral Scanners in a Four-Implant Complete-Arch Model.
    Spagopoulos D; Kaisarlis G; Spagopoulou F; Halazonetis DJ; Güth JF; Papazoglou E
    Dent J (Basel); 2023 Jan; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 36661564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. The effect different substrates have on the trueness and precision of eight different intraoral scanners.
    Dutton E; Ludlow M; Mennito A; Kelly A; Evans Z; Culp A; Kessler R; Renne W
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2020 Mar; 32(2):204-218. PubMed ID: 31568660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Effect of novel prefabricated auxiliary devices attaching to scan bodies on the accuracy of intraoral scanning of complete-arch with multiple implants: An in-vitro study.
    Wu HK; Wang J; Chen G; Huang X; Deng F; Li Y
    J Dent; 2023 Nov; 138():104702. PubMed ID: 37714453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Prosthesis accuracy of fit on 3D-printed casts versus stone casts: A comparative study in the anterior maxilla.
    Abdeen L; Chen YW; Kostagianni A; Finkelman M; Papathanasiou A; Chochlidakis K; Papaspyridakos P
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Dec; 34(8):1238-1246. PubMed ID: 36415927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Deviations in palatal region between indirect and direct digital models: an in vivo study.
    Zhongpeng Y; Tianmin X; Ruoping J
    BMC Oral Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):66. PubMed ID: 31029133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners for scanning edentulous and dentate complete-arch mandibular casts: A comparative in vitro study.
    Braian M; Wennerberg A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Aug; 122(2):129-136.e2. PubMed ID: 30885584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Sources of error in maximum intercuspation from complete dentate full-arch intraoral scans in vitro.
    Osnes C; Wu J; Ferrari M; Joda T; Keeling A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Sep; 24(3):283-291. PubMed ID: 34553893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Effect of splinting scan bodies on trueness of complete-arch implant impression using different intraoral scanners: an in vitro study.
    Retana L; Nejat AH; Pozzi A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2023 Feb; 26(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 35072425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Conventional Versus Digital Complete Arch Implant Impressions.
    Albayrak B; Sukotjo C; Wee AG; Korkmaz İH; Bayındır F
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Feb; 30(2):163-170. PubMed ID: 32935894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Effect of different span lengths with different total occlusal convergences on the accuracy of intraoral scanners.
    Yehia A; Abo El Fadl A; El Sergany O; Ebeid K
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Mar; 33(3):252-258. PubMed ID: 36988154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Effect of different intraoral scanners and scanbody splinting on accuracy of scanning implant-supported full arch fixed prosthesis.
    Ashraf Y; Abo El Fadl A; Hamdy A; Ebeid K
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2023 Dec; 35(8):1257-1263. PubMed ID: 37310208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.