These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39082381)

  • 1. Temporal trends and regional variations in operative vaginal deliveries in Japan: A national representative cohort study.
    Sugai S; Mori Y; Yamawaki K; Shima E; Matsushita M; Yoshihara K; Nishijima K
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2024 Sep; 50(9):1494-1500. PubMed ID: 39082381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporal and Regional Variations in Operative Vaginal Delivery in Canada by Pelvic Station, 2004-2012.
    Muraca GM; Sabr Y; Brant R; Cundiff GW; Joseph KS
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2016 Jul; 38(7):627-35. PubMed ID: 27591346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Join point trends of instrumental vaginal deliveries and cesarean sections at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria (2002-2017).
    Olamijulo JA; Aliyu Z; Olorunfemi G; Adeyinka AT; Ubom AE; Abikoye O
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2024 Oct; 167(1):445-452. PubMed ID: 38864274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vaginal operative deliveries in Italy.
    Parazzini F; Cortinovis I; Restelli S; Bortolus R; Tozzi L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1994 Oct; 73(9):698-700. PubMed ID: 7976244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trends in operative vaginal delivery, 2005-2013: a population-based study.
    Merriam AA; Ananth CV; Wright JD; Siddiq Z; D'Alton ME; Friedman AM
    BJOG; 2017 Aug; 124(9):1365-1372. PubMed ID: 28236337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of the Robson Ten Group Classification System to categorise operative vaginal delivery.
    O'Leary BD; Kane DT; Kruseman Aretz N; Geary MP; Malone FD; Hehir MP
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Dec; 60(6):858-864. PubMed ID: 32350863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trends in obstetric operative procedures, 1980 to 1987.
    Zahniser SC; Kendrick JS; Franks AL; Saftlas AF
    Am J Public Health; 1992 Oct; 82(10):1340-4. PubMed ID: 1415856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. National variations in operative vaginal deliveries in Ireland.
    Daly N; Bonham S; O'Dwyer V; O'Connor C; Kent E; Turner MJ
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Jun; 125(3):210-3. PubMed ID: 24709535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Temporal trends and morbidities of vacuum, forceps, and combined use of both.
    Fong A; Wu E; Pan D; Chung JH; Ogunyemi DA
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Dec; 27(18):1886-91. PubMed ID: 24635372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Trends in vaginal assisted deliveries in the Moravian-Silesian region between the years 2002-2011].
    Simetka O; Velebil P
    Ceska Gynekol; 2012 Jun; 77(3):232-6. PubMed ID: 22779725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.
    Vayssière C; Beucher G; Dupuis O; Feraud O; Simon-Toulza C; Sentilhes L; Meunier E; Parant O; Schmitz T; Riethmuller D; Baud O; Galley-Raulin F; Diemunsch P; Pierre F; Schaal JP; Fournié A; Oury JF;
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Nov; 159(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 21802193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Failed individual and sequential instrumental vaginal delivery: contributing risk factors and maternal-neonatal complications.
    Al-Kadri H; Sabr Y; Al-Saif S; Abulaimoun B; Ba'Aqeel H; Saleh A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2003 Jul; 82(7):642-8. PubMed ID: 12790846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A simple model to predict the complicated operative vaginal deliveries using vacuum or forceps.
    Sainz JA; García-Mejido JA; Aquise A; Borrero C; Bonomi MJ; Fernández-Palacín A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 220(2):193.e1-193.e12. PubMed ID: 30391443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trends in instrument preference for operative vaginal delivery in a tertiary referral center: 2008-2021.
    Crowley CM; Lang NA; O'Leary BD; Geary MP
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Aug; 162(2):752-758. PubMed ID: 36815738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of outcomes between operative vaginal deliveries and spontaneous vaginal deliveries in southeast Nigeria.
    Lawani LO; Anozie OB; Ezeonu PO; Iyoke CA
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Jun; 125(3):206-9. PubMed ID: 24717812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Instrumental (operative) vaginal deliveries: vacuum extraction compared with forceps delivery at Ilorin University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.
    Anate M
    West Afr J Med; 1991; 10(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 1911480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk factors for obstetrical anal sphincter lacerations.
    Dandolu V; Chatwani A; Harmanli O; Floro C; Gaughan JP; Hernandez E
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2005; 16(4):304-7. PubMed ID: 15809773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Severe maternal and neonatal morbidity after attempted operative vaginal delivery.
    Panelli DM; Leonard SA; Joudi N; Girsen AI; Judy AE; El-Sayed YY; Gilbert WM; Lyell DJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 May; 3(3):100339. PubMed ID: 33631384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Operative vaginal deliveries in Zaria, Nigeria.
    Adaji SE; Shittu SO; Sule ST
    Ann Afr Med; 2009; 8(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 19805939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Obstetric attending physician characteristics and their impact on vacuum and forceps delivery rates: University of California at San Francisco experience from 1977 to 1999.
    Chang AL; Noah MS; Laros RK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jun; 186(6):1299-303. PubMed ID: 12066112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.